It was FBI Special Agent Harry Samit that called Maltbie and Frasca criminals who had criminally blocked his investigation of Moussaoui, in sworn testimony at the trail of Zacarias Moussaoui.
It was further FBI HQ RFU that had blocked FBI Agent Samit’s investigation not the CIA, was there a turf war between the FBI field agents and the FBI HQ? Weren’t they support to be on the same side.
Paloalto:
The problem here, is you are providing circumstantial, and frankly "suggestive" evidence only. That might get someone to think "hmmm that is peculiar" but here on this forum, is not going to CONVINCE anyone.
If your goal is convince us that some persons within many of the intelligence agencies were ignorant to the risks, perhaps even negligent in their duties, you might not get much of an argument.
However, to extrapolate from such suggestions to "The FBI and CIA purposely ignored or purposely covered up evidence that would have prevented the 9/11 attacks", is simply ridiculous, and not likely to gain much support on this forum.
TAM