Merged Interesting Analysis of Changing Media Attitudes toward 9/11 Alternative Theories

TruthersLie said:
My exchange with Lance deHaven-Smith

And he is most definately in the truther/conspiracy theorist camp. But he wants to change the term to SCADS (social crimes against democracy) which is rather catchy.
Click to expand...


Laurie Manwell, one of the other named authors, is also a 9/11 conspiracy fantasist. She's had articles *cough* previously published *cough* in the JONES.
 
Hokulele said:
An article about the paper in the OP isn't a separate item of evidence for the paper in the OP.
Click to expand...

A journalism professor in the US is supporting the paper's findings in the University paper and it got picked up by the local paper, which further supports the idea that media coverage is turning neutral toward 9/11 questioning.
 
RedIbis said:
A journalism professor in the US is supporting the paper's findings in the University paper and it got picked up by the local paper, which further supports the idea that media coverage is turning neutral toward 9/11 questioning.
Click to expand...

The local paper? You make it seem like it was the Indianapolis star, and not puff piece in a small college's student newspaper about an opinion piece that a local professor published in an insignificant alternative weekly.

As a matter of fact, Red, as you are forced to scrape the bottom of the barrel of student run newspapers to get any mention of the garbage in the OP, your post is a shining example of the complete and utter irrelevance of the truth movement.

Hey Red, my local paper is reporting that Brownie Troop 239 is helping to sell Girl Scout cookies at the local Piggly Wiggly! Why would Brownies be selling Girl Scout cookies??

Inside jobby job, that is why!
 
BigAl said:
I can't find any text in Howley's article where he expresses approval of anything he's quoting.

Did Red see something I'm missing?
Click to expand...

there is a link to the half wit's completely uncritical acceptance of the Jones boys self published Super nano thermite bull **** article.

To bad that Jones doesn't even believe it anymore.
 
BigAl said:
I can't find any text in Howley's article where he expresses approval of anything he's quoting.

Did Red see something I'm missing?
Click to expand...

Yes. Check the last few paragraphs at this link.

"Changing journalistic attitudes toward the 911 Truth movement is a welcome and long overdue development. We also owe a debt of gratitude to international news workers who have shifted the terms of the debate away from conspiracy theory to a legitimate scientific debate worthy of public scrutiny.

"Changing journalistic attitudes toward the 911 Truth movement is a welcome and long overdue development."
 
16.5 said:
The local paper? You make it seem like it was the Indianapolis star, and not puff piece in a small college's student newspaper about an opinion piece that a local professor published in an insignificant alternative weekly.
Click to expand...

Scroll and read.

Read the complete text at the weekly newspaper's Web site.
Click to expand...
 
RedIbis said:
Scroll and read.
Click to expand...

Hey Thanks! Gee I would not have noticed that it was an insignificant local "alternative" weekly had you not pointed that out.

Oh yeah, and had I not already gone to the insignificant paper's insignificant website already and confirmed just how insignificant it really was.

/how the **** did you miss that in my posts???
 
I don't know; the acceptance of grotesquely inaccurate theories in any media outlet would be a negative if you ask me. The media has enough issues with politics, I don't like the idea of adding engineering and scientific incompetence to the mix. Especially not on the same level as the conspiracy movement
 
RedIbis said:
Yes. Check the last few paragraphs at this link.

"Changing journalistic attitudes toward the 911 Truth movement is a welcome and long overdue development. We also owe a debt of gratitude to international news workers who have shifted the terms of the debate away from conspiracy theory to a legitimate scientific debate worthy of public scrutiny.

"Changing journalistic attitudes toward the 911 Truth movement is a welcome and long overdue development."
Click to expand...
Another person who supports idiotic ideas and can't figure out Jones and his thermite are an insane claim based on Jones' insanity. Thermite was Jones insane claim, and now Jones says the US caused the Haiti earthquake. Your new found super reported supports insane claims and failed to discover they had to pay to have their moronic paper published.

How many people are ignorant enough to fall for the lies of 911 truth?

It is not another good article, it is another failed reporter fooled by idiots. That is pathetic that a PhD is fooled by idiots making up lies.
 
RedIbis said:
Yes. Check the last few paragraphs at this link.

"Changing journalistic attitudes toward the 911 Truth movement is a welcome and long overdue development. We also owe a debt of gratitude to international news workers who have shifted the terms of the debate away from conspiracy theory to a legitimate scientific debate worthy of public scrutiny.

"Changing journalistic attitudes toward the 911 Truth movement is a welcome and long overdue development."
Click to expand...

OK. He's fact-deprived and speaking outside his area of expertise. As a media critic he should look in the mirror.

I was referring to the article on the Depauw website.

http://www.depauw.edu/news/?id=24962
 
RedIbis said:
How is he speaking outside of his area of expertise? He's a communications professor talking about media attitudes.
Click to expand...
He posted about a paper which he failed to understand was based on insanity of thermite. He is stupid on 911. (chemistry, and doesn't know when the source of his story comes from liars) He is a failed communications professor, unless you think his inability to identify liars is a good thing?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom