• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The most stupid 911 Conspiracy Theory to date

roscoe_the_first said:
Bit like the Government's case (I struggle to say evidence) against Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda.

Yes but erm! The FBI hasn't indicted Osama Bin Laden for the 911 attacks. How's that for a source?

A FACT!!!! Which you can check out yourself right now.
Click to expand...

You are absolutely right. Why do you need me to tell you why that is? Did the United States handle 9/11 as a law enforcement issue? No, we treated it as an act of war, not as a criminal act. That means that the Bush administration wanted him dead and not sitting in some Federal prison somewhere for the rest o his days. On the off chance that law enforcement caught up with him before a bomb did, then there is no statute of limitation on murder. Meanwhile, indictments are already on the books for pre-9/11 activities so that in the off chance law enforcement did catch up with him, there is already a mechanism to bring him to trial on.

Why do you need an indictment to drop a bomb on the man's head? Now back to the issue you still have not provided evidence for...still waiting.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
What part of:



Don't you understand?

Give me your address as to where I need to send the donkey ears?
Click to expand...

I swear, twoofers have the worst reading comprehension of anybody in the entire world. This is bs's post:

bill smith said:
You don't happen to have the video where Robin Cook said the following do you ?

"The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the 'devil' only in order to drive the TV watcher to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US ..."

some other info..
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5656208&postcount=2453 hyperlink
Click to expand...

Cook didn't say that.

You fail, twoofer.
 
dtugg said:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article1529879.ece

Yosri Fouda also wrote a book on the subject.

Let me guess: al-Jazeera is controlled by the CIA.
Click to expand...

So he's a serial confession geek.

Al Jazeera is run by the son of Rupert Murdoch.

Frankly if this station did the daily horoscope that would be the only thing that was nearest to the truth than anything else they said.

We're in lot of trouble

Anyway we were talking about Osama Bin Laden and he is dead. The Taliban offered to turn Bin Laden over, Bush refused. They didn't want the bogie man taken out of circulation.
 
Last edited:
roscoe_the_first said:
Still Here? Around these parts you can't move for them.

Doing seminars at the moment and most of the time we need more seats.

Of course thanks to the wonderful BBC the people are now also aware that (if they didn't know already) their BBC are .
Click to expand...

So the BBC told people that they(the BBC) are "compulsive habitual lying SOBs:?
 
SatansMaleVoiceChoir said:
Hit a little too close to home did I? Good, because I was aiming for the toilet.

However, I will not be drawn into a battle of wits with you; it's clear I am fighting against an unarmed opponent.
Click to expand...

I don't answer you, I have a conscience. Arguing with you will be like beating cripples. I'd always feel bad about doing it.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Got to go now, thanks for the fun.


I have life that needs tending to.

Don't forget

Watch this, it's just beeee-utiful

I'll be back later to blow a few more away. If I'm banned in the meantime (fundementaly because T.H.E.Y. can't handle me, usually the case) I'll go on every other forum and shout from roof tops my experience here.
Click to expand...

Oh noes you're going to badmouth the JREF! WOW that's never happened before.

BTW forums don't have rooftops.
 
tsig said:
So the BBC told people that they(the BBC) are "compulsive habitual lying SOBs:?
Click to expand...

Well let me put it like this. The BBC hit piece of 18th February 2007 is so utterly incompetent that I can't help thinking that this is some kind of double bluff on their part. They deliberately took a fall.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
I don't answer you, I have a conscience. Arguing with you will be like beating cripples. I'd always feel bad about doing it.
Click to expand...

Well, as fun for you as this must be - what do you think you are actually achieving here?

If you're so convinced of the 'truth' then why are you bothering arguing on a relatively small, obscure internet forum, trying to convince people who seem predisposed not to believe anything you say?

What matters more to you; that you score perceived points against 'debunkers', or you actually raise some real public awareness and prove your theories, thereby bringing the 'perpetrators' to justice?

You'll forgive me if I know you're going to stick to the first one.
 
SatansMaleVoiceChoir said:
Well, as fun for you as this must be - what do you think you are actually achieving here?

If you're so convinced of the 'truth' then why are you bothering arguing on a relatively small, obscure internet forum, trying to convince people who seem predisposed not to believe anything you say?

What matters more to you; that you score perceived points against 'debunkers', or you actually raise some real public awareness and prove your theories, thereby bringing the 'perpetrators' to justice?

You'll forgive me if I know you're going to stick to the first one.
Click to expand...

Causing a few chair shuffles and showing these after_the_fact accomplices to murder that we're well and truly in their face.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Click - Will the next *********** please sign in.
Edited by Locknar: 
Moderated content removed.
Click to expand...

Wow. Yet another epic fail from you.

1) This was about News Corp buying a 9% stake in some company called Rotana. Nothing to do with al-Jazeera.
2) Even if News Corp did buy a stake in al-Jazeera (which it didn't), this story was from just a couple weeks ago. KSM confessed to the al-Jazeera journalist in 2002. Surely even you aren't too dumb to see the problem with your "logic" here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
roscoe_the_first said:
They'll ban me, they'll have to. They can't handle me.
Click to expand...

They'll ban you because you have already admitted to having two distinct accounts. This is a direct violation of the Membership Agreement, which you agreed to abide by when you signed up.

But before you go, dtugg asked you to back up this:

Al Jazeera is run by the son of Rupert Murdoch
Can you get to that before you commit suicide-by-mod? Pro-tip: minority stakeholders don't control companies.

Thanks so much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom