The most stupid 911 Conspiracy Theory to date

[bill smith]

And she didn't even start until after 9/11. Furthermore, one would assume that this isn't the kind of information they would be giving out to rookie FBI translators.

"Most gagged woman in American history"?!?!?! She can't seem to keep her mouth shut.

Yes....great, isn't it ?

 

[roscoe_the_first]

Translation: "Oh no, they are asking me to back up what I say!"

Back again temporarily.

Here try this for starters

Then again try something really radical and type into Google

"Bin Laden was CIA asset"

This is like shooting rats in barrel.

 

[dtugg]

Back again temporarily.

Here try this for starters

This is like shooting rats in barrel.

LOL! This is what you're offering for proof. Really?

I guess if some random Pakistanis say so, it is true.

 

[PB2007]

Then again try something really radical and type into Google

"Bin Laden was CIA asset"

This is like shooting rats in barrel.

3 results...

Infowars
TruthDig
and a Russian forum thread that starts with

Perhaps in a year or two they will also admit that Mossad successfully blew up the World Trade Center, and Jews made billions on the deal

AFTER YEARS OF DECEIT: US OPENLY ACCEPTS BIN LADEN LONG DEAD

Well done...

 

[roscoe_the_first]

Zbigniew Brzezinski

The CIA’s role in laying the foundations of Al Qaeda is confirmed in an 1998 interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, who at the time was National Security Adviser to President Jimmy Carter:

Brzezinski: According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahideen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, [on] 24 December 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise. Indeed, it was July 3, 1979, that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the President in which I explained to him that in my opinion, this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

<snip>

The CIA was more cautious than the Pakistanis. Both Pakistan and the United States took the line of deception on Afghanistan with a public posture of negotiating a settlement, while privately agreeing that military escalation was the best course." (Diego Cordovez and Selig Harrison, Out of Afghanistan: The Inside Story of the Soviet Withdrawal, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995. See also the review of Cordovez and Harrison in International Press Services, 22 August 1995).

Al Qaeda doesn't exist 1

Al Qaeda doesn't exist 2

All I typed into google was Zbigniew Brzezinski+Al Qaeda.

I have this feeling I've been transported into a forum full of retards.

Edited by Locknar: 

Edited, breach of Rule 4. Do not quote full (or significant) amounts of text from other sites, and make sure to properly cite/reference what you do quote.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

Logging out

Got to go now please feel free to post some more retard stuff I can play with.

 

[dtugg]

I see the liar still hasn't provided proof that bin Laden was a CIA asset. Huge shocker there.

 

[332nd]

Got to go now please feel free to post some more retard stuff I can play with.

So you don't have word?

 

[BCR]

Al Qaeda doesn't exist 1

Al Qaeda doesn't exist 2

All I typed into google was Zbigniew Brzezinski+Al Qaeda.

I have this feeling I've been transported into a forum full of retards.

You still have not made the case that Brzezinski "created" Al Qaeda. Yes, the CIA/ISI funded and trained Afghan and Arab fighters during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. However, Bin Laden had his own financial resources and support network as well, primarily Saudi.

 

[BCR]

Back again temporarily.

Here try this for starters

Then again try something really radical and type into Google

"Bin Laden was CIA asset"

This is like shooting rats in barrel.

No sir, that was NOT your claim, your claim was...

The name Al Qaeda was invented by Zbigniew Brzezinski

He told us.

Now please provide some evidence for this claim.

 

[dtugg]

No sir, that was NOT your claim, your claim was...



Now please provide some evidence for this claim.

He also claimed that bin Laden was a CIA asset. Shockingly, he hasn't provided evidence for either claim.

 

[roscoe_the_first]

He also claimed that bin Laden was a CIA asset. Shockingly, he hasn't provided evidence for either claim.

read The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinski

On the left Zbigniew Brzezinski on the right Osama Bin Laden.

British Former Foreign Secretary Robin Cook on Al Qaeda

Died without warning by a heart Attack

You have to read books you see and stop watching Fox News

 

[BCR]

He also claimed that bin Laden was a CIA asset. Shockingly, he hasn't provided evidence for either claim.

Yes, but I asked about the "named" aspect. I try to stay focused on one thing that way these guys have a fighting chance. Should be easy to prove just the one claim I would think. Bin Laden hated America. He asked for, neither would have he accepted any ties with the CIA. By the time of the Kuwait invasion, he was back in Saudi Arabia begging the Saud's not to allow American forces into the kingdom. He asserted that they did not need the Americans and that he could do the job of defending the kingdom using Arab fighters from the Afghan war.

The CIA/ISI (along with Saudi intelligence) did provide material support to the Afghan fighters. However, the ISI and Saudi's had a totally different agenda than did the CIA. ISI did most of the Afghanistan cross-border activity and developed the liason's with the various factions involved, not the CIA. Quite frankly, at that time, Bin Laden was a rather minor player involved mostly in non-combat support (such as constructing roads and facilities). So for what purpose would the CIA want to develop a minor player as an asset?

I would suggest laying off the truther sites and perhaps reading a good book on the subject. May I recommend "Ghost Wars" by Steve Coll as an excellent primer?

 

[dtugg]

read The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinski

Something tells me it doesn't prove any of what you're claiming and that you've never even read the book.

[qimg]http://www.infowars.com/images2/nwo/250407_binLaden-Brzezinski.jpg[/qimg]
On the left Zbigniew Brzezinski on the right Osama Bin Laden.

Prove it. Just because Info Wars says so doesn't make it true. And Brzezinski wasn't CIA.

 

[BCR]

On the left Zbigniew Brzezinski on the right Osama Bin Laden.

That guy looks absolutely NOTHING like Bin Laden

 

[MikeW]

read The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinski

Excellent, I have it here. I see no mention of bin Laden, though, or al Qaeda. Just quotes like this on page #7:

"The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan precipitated a two-pronged American response: direct US assistance to the native resistance in Afghanistan in order to bog down the Soviet army; and a large-scale buildup of the U.S. military presence in the Persian Gulf as a deterrent to any further southward projection of Soviet political or military power."

But maybe it's me - I mean, you wouldn't just have posted this as a bluff to buy time, right? Fortunately the book is online here so you can point us directly to the references you're talking about.

 

[MikeW]

That guy looks absolutely NOTHING like Bin Laden

And another problem, perhaps: isn't that a Pakistani army uniform?

 

[Reactor drone]

While there were contacts at the upper levels of the intelligence hierarchy, Islamic rebel leaders in the war theatre had no contacts with Washington or the CIA.

Your evidence of of a CIA/Bin Laden association seems contradicatory at best.


Please try harder.

 

[BCR]

And another problem, perhaps: isn't that a Pakistani army uniform?

Could be, but I'm no expert on Pakistani uniforms. I don't recall the Arab fighters wearing uniforms though. Could be wrong.

 

[dtugg]

Isn't bin Laden left handed? The person in the photo is holding the weapon like a right handed person would.