Tony Szamboti
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
- Messages
- 4,976
Now that I actually bother to read this, it is amazing how amateurish this paper is, even to someone who knows very little about physics. Take this figure from page 5:
OK, first off he takes what little precision he has in measuring the vertical and skips every 5 frames, thereby smoothing over any possiblity of observing his "deceleration", but where are they getting these measurements? They are only making 5 measurements per second, but they have 2 decimal points of precision. Then for the vertical, they are measuring pixels on a compressed YouTube video taken from hundreds of meters away from the twin towers, using an unknown camera, yet they claim to have a precision to a thousandth of a meter? They can really measure the collapse to the millimeter?
Then their velocity is also carried out to the thousandth, despite the fact that neither of the measurements that went into it are even precise to one decimal point.
Didn't they teach this kind of thing in 5th grade math?
ETA: Then on page 8 they use this completely false precision and come up with even more false precision:
You can moan and groan all you want James, but the reality is that the upper section of WTC 1 did not decelerate. This means it could not have applied a dynamic load and something else must have been removing the strength of the columns below, as they were designed to support several times the load above them.
The tilt has also been shown to be irrelevant here as it has been measured and shown not to cause the columns to miss. The tilt is quite small in comparison to the drop for the first several stories. Take a look at the work being done over at the 911freeforum on this http://the911forum.freeforums.org/missing-jolts-found-film-at-11-t222-360.html.
It looks like there is a very serious problem for the present official story on how WTC 1 collapsed, as the explanations put forth by the NIST and Dr. Bazant require a dynamic load to cause a collapse propagation. Well there isn't one.
Last edited:
