• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth.

Status
Not open for further replies.
What logical fallacy do I commit when I ask DOC to consider why no current Harvard Law School professor uses the New Testament as a good example for textual evidence concerning factual happenings?

Others may correctme but I do think that this would fall under the 'absence of evidence is not evidence of absence'. To take a parallel from a recent UFO thread. The visual report is inconclusive, could have been a blimp they were known to be in the area report generally confrms to blimp on many points. Prove it was a blimp. I can't. Then it wasn't a blimp. Just because a Harvard Law Prof. hasn't written anything on the topic that we can put our hands on doesn't mean a Harvard Prof. doesn't have that opinion. At best it is a null, we don't know. Any conclusions are speculation.
 
I say let the thread keep on going.

If it's closed DOC will claim that the truth was suppressed because he was winning the debate.

On the other hand, almost all of the posts DOC makes demonstrate his inadequacies in debate, research, logic, christianity, reading, honesty......

If it were closed DOC might start posting in other places on the Forum.:eye-poppi
 
You have to hand it to the guy though. He is persistent . The morons, or JWs could use a guy like him. :)
 
You have to hand it to the guy though. He is persistent . The morons, or JWs could use a guy like him. :)

I certainly hope that he is off researching the points that Simon and I have rised I look forward to en enlightening and engaging discussion when he returns.

BTW I also bought my first lottery ticket today, I hope I win.
 
I certainly hope that he is off researching the points that Simon and I have rised I look forward to en enlightening and engaging discussion when he returns.

BTW I also bought my first lottery ticket today, I hope I win.
Oh dear, that game is for mugs who don't know any better. The lottery on the other hand can be fun.
 
Last edited:
I certainly hope that he is off researching the points that Simon and I have rised I look forward to en enlightening and engaging discussion when he returns.

BTW I also bought my first lottery ticket today, I hope I win.

Oh dear, that game is for mugs who don't know any better. The lottery on the other hand can be fun.
Ahh...to pay a small amount to gain the right to engage in the wage-slave's favorite activity, "What would I do with $200million".
 
Now now, this thread isn't about DOCK. It's about.... er....... um. Carry on then.
 
Why should I truss you?

Oh no, you can't trust him! I on the other hand am an honest man. Now. Can I interest you in this tower I have for sale in the city of Pisa in Italy? It has a very prominent lean to it, otherwise it's in perfect condition. I start the bidding at One million AU. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom