• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Obama and Dems to go it alone on health-care reform, if GOP refuses to compromise

The people wanted it before the Republicans threw a tantrum and blocked every attempt to pass a bill that would work. What is on the table now will be a weak attempt to achieve the initial ends.

I wonder, too, how many of the people who now oppose health care reform oppose it because they believe the lies that the right wing squawk radio and the Arctic MILF have been telling them?

Lefty, before Brown won in Mass. the GOP could'nt block anything.
If you wanna blame a party blame your own.
 
public-option is now dead.

i see no HONEST reason why this very watered down new plan shouldn't pass.

though, I would have really liked to have seen a non-profit option in there...and that too appears to be gone.

:(
 
It seems odd to describe dodging a parliamentary trick intended to prevent a simple majority vote, would be considered a parliamentary trick to "force" the bill against the will of the voters.
There's nothing "odd" about it, it's just more demagoguery from Republicans. It doesn't have to make sense.
When 70% are against it, in spite of the election a year and a half ago?
Why didn't Bush resign when 70% of the United States was against him?

I mean, if you're gonna rule by opinion poll, you might as well be consistent.
 
Last edited:
Lefty, before Brown won in Mass. the GOP could'nt block anything.
If you wanna blame a party blame your own.

They could block it by filibuster. It takes sixty votes to bring cloture. We never had sixty. There was the problem of Landrieu and the little snivelling moron from Connecticut who were not on board.
 
Let me say this:

I like this plan MORE than I like doing nothing.

does anyone like doing nothing MORE than they like this plan?
 
I knew that Obamacare was doomed as soon as I heard he had worked out a deal with the drug industry and insurace companies. Any attempt to actually fix US healthcare practically requires that we screw these people over.

Random,

Since your erudite post got lost amidst the petty partisan bickering, I thought I should let you know at least one member (me) read it and found it well-written and insightful (and nominated).

-marksman
 
forbidding insurance companies from dropping coverage when you get sick, or not covering pre-existing conditions, will not help people?
 
It seems odd to describe dodging a parliamentary trick intended to prevent a simple majority vote, would be considered a parliamentary trick to "force" the bill against the will of the voters.

Well.. to the GOP, the minority is the will of the people, today. However, the next time the GOP has the majority of seats, then the majority will represent the will of the people againg.
 
yes, it is sad that in a Congress that is supposed to respect majority rule, the Dems have to use parliamentary maneuvers to pass pretty much any legislation.
 
When 70% are against it, in spite of the election a year and a half ago?

I find it disturbing said officials are proceeding down this path in spite of the knowledge of the changed opinions of those who democratically put them there.

Does democracy mean nothing? "We won for reasons that have nothing to do with health care, so we're gonna jam it down everyone's throat anyway, in spite of all evidence to the contrary that they don't, in fact, want it?"

So you would say that it is being jammed down everyone's throats, regardless of whether it passes with a 60-vote supermajority, or via the reconciliation process? Why only the furor at this particular method then?

And 70% against it. The response to that depends heavily on how the question is phrased to the respondents.
 
So you would say that it is being jammed down everyone's throats, regardless of whether it passes with a 60-vote supermajority, or via the reconciliation process? Why only the furor at this particular method then?

And 70% against it. The response to that depends heavily on how the question is phrased to the respondents.
I think that symptom strikes when one is against the bill.
 
I don't understand how republicans stopped the bill to begin with. Democrats had a 60 seat majority. Seems like Obama failures just get blamed on republicans.
 
I don't understand how republicans stopped the bill to begin with. Democrats had a 60 seat majority. Seems like Obama failures just get blamed on republicans.

Hmm remember a bit of a fuss in Massachusetts recently? It's 59 right now.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom