how they're planning to go it alone for the good of The People, in spite of polls showing The People don't want it.
there are no polls on Obama's new plan yet.
how they're planning to go it alone for the good of The People, in spite of polls showing The People don't want it.
The people wanted it before the Republicans threw a tantrum and blocked every attempt to pass a bill that would work. What is on the table now will be a weak attempt to achieve the initial ends.
I wonder, too, how many of the people who now oppose health care reform oppose it because they believe the lies that the right wing squawk radio and the Arctic MILF have been telling them?
There's nothing "odd" about it, it's just more demagoguery from Republicans. It doesn't have to make sense.It seems odd to describe dodging a parliamentary trick intended to prevent a simple majority vote, would be considered a parliamentary trick to "force" the bill against the will of the voters.
Why didn't Bush resign when 70% of the United States was against him?When 70% are against it, in spite of the election a year and a half ago?
Lefty, before Brown won in Mass. the GOP could'nt block anything.
If you wanna blame a party blame your own.
does anyone like doing nothing MORE than they like this plan?
I knew that Obamacare was doomed as soon as I heard he had worked out a deal with the drug industry and insurace companies. Any attempt to actually fix US healthcare practically requires that we screw these people over.
Yes. What's different? I think I need new glasses. I can't see it.
In this case, nobody is offering anything that will make things better.
42 votes for cloture. 38 successful. How is that obscene?
It seems odd to describe dodging a parliamentary trick intended to prevent a simple majority vote, would be considered a parliamentary trick to "force" the bill against the will of the voters.
yes, it is sad thatin a Congress that is supposed to respect majority rule,the Dems have to use parliamentary maneuvers to pass pretty much any legislation.
When 70% are against it, in spite of the election a year and a half ago?
I find it disturbing said officials are proceeding down this path in spite of the knowledge of the changed opinions of those who democratically put them there.
Does democracy mean nothing? "We won for reasons that have nothing to do with health care, so we're gonna jam it down everyone's throat anyway, in spite of all evidence to the contrary that they don't, in fact, want it?"
I think that symptom strikes when one is against the bill.So you would say that it is being jammed down everyone's throats, regardless of whether it passes with a 60-vote supermajority, or via the reconciliation process? Why only the furor at this particular method then?
And 70% against it. The response to that depends heavily on how the question is phrased to the respondents.
I don't understand how republicans stopped the bill to begin with. Democrats had a 60 seat majority. Seems like Obama failures just get blamed on republicans.