1) Why is it that we have so few pictures and films of the most 'eventful' areas of the alleged 'D-Day' invasion? There are only a handful of obviously faked blurry pictures invovling action. All the other ones could have easily been staged off the coast of England or California. Films taken at other beaches show little action or battle, and were obviously staged!
2) How is it that movies, such as 'The Longest Day' and 'Saving Private Ryan' are so accurate in depicting the 'real' action shown in films of the alleged 'D-Day'??
3) Why is the (fake) villain of this tale so inconsistant? Does the Pentagon expect us to believe that this Hitler, who wanted Paris to burn when the 'allies' approached it, is the same one who abandoned Rome to the 'allies'?? What does the Pentagon want us to think of their phoney villain.
4) Japanese pilots were trained heavily, had years of experience flying in China, and were trained in the secrets of Ninjas and Samurai. Yet we are expected to beleive that some plucky allied pilots, with no training at all, managed to beat them in under 4 years? Ridiculous!
5) Every test of every piece of equipment allagedly used in the 'war' indicate that under certain circumstances, the equipment would fail. Obviously this failure rate would make a war impossible. The Pentatgon knew this and so had to fake the war.
6) Early Films of the 'Germans' show their soldiers carrying Bolt-action rifles. Yet later on they are shown using advanced assault rifles (the alleged MP-44). Why were they not using them in the first place if they had them?
7) The so-called 'war dead' are only shown today as crosses in graveyards. Does the Pentagon expect us to accept this as evidence that people actually died?
8) The only example of a war in the first half of the 20th century, the Great War (Called erroniously 'World War 1' by Pentagon worshipping, World War 2 believing sheeple) , showed that wars were fought by hiding in trenches and making mass attacks on the enemies trenches. The rifles used in those wars were the same ones used at the beginning of the so-called 'Second; world war. Obviously no technological developments had been made since 1918 and so the so-called WW2 should have been fought int he same manner as the Great War. The Pentagon obviously felt this wasn't dramatic enough.
9) 'Aircraft Carriers'. Does the Pentagon actually expect us to believe that such a thing could float, let alone function? Come on!
10) In several newsreel films with MacArthur, natives and aides can be seen in the background making hand gestures or expressions that can be interpeted by obscure native cultures and sign language as meaning 'no'. Obviously this was an attempt by a mole to signal that everything was faked.
And finally:
11) Why can't we fight 'WW2' again today?