Almost 3,000 new photos released today of the WTC Collapse

[BigAl]

I am pretty sure the photos were just photographs he took himself while he happened to be up there, and not as part of his job. After the attacks he distributed some of the photos to friends, online, and so forth of his own volition. I can't see a police officer doing that with photos that he took as part of his duties (and therefore belonging to the police).

If the pics are private, I'm fine with the owner restricting access and making a buck but after 9 years, ITSM that they have passed their best-used-by date and he's made all the money he's going to make. Better he should put a watermark on each image and let them lose on the Internets on the odd chance that more people will see them and once in a while someone will buy one.

 

[gumboot]

If the pics are private, I'm fine with the owner restricting access and making a buck but after 9 years, ITSM that they have passed their best-used-by date and he's made all the money he's going to make. Better he should put a watermark on each image and let them lose on the Internets on the odd chance that more people will see them and once in a while someone will buy one.

I don't think he has done anything with them at all. ABC acquired them via a FOIA release, and ABC released the pictures publicly. The photographer doesn't appear to be upset by this, nor can I see any evidence that he has any desire to make money off them.

 

[aggle-rithm]

I don't think he has done anything with them at all. ABC acquired them via a FOIA release, and ABC released the pictures publicly. The photographer doesn't appear to be upset by this, nor can I see any evidence that he has any desire to make money off them.

His NWO salary is more than enough compensation.

 

[twinstead]

I hear our reptilian overlords are going to start matching our NWO 401k contributions. Cool!

 

[aggle-rithm]

I hear our reptilian overlords are going to start matching our NWO 401k contributions. Cool!

Too bad they made themselves beneficiaries on our life insurance.

 

[bill smith]

Interesting video. Pass it on.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NX_UKdqoa_o&feature=player_embedded

 

[Thunder]

I want Time Warner Cable to take Russia Today off the air.

and btw, u see how many floors those fires were on? i count at least 10. so much for "take this down with 2 lines" crap.

 

[Sam.I.Am]

Russia today?

 

[Cuddles]

A large number of posts have been split to this thread. If you wish to discuss a favourite issue, start a thread for it rather than derailing an existing one.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles

 

[jaydeehess]

Interesting video. Pass it on.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NX_UKdqoa_o&feature=player_embedded

Interesting in his calling up of topics which have been debunked over and over again for years now.

 

[jaydeehess]

I want Time Warner Cable to take Russia Today off the air.

and btw, u see how many floors those fires were on? i count at least 10. so much for "take this down with 2 lines" crap.

Well, the 'two lines' reference comes from the firefighter who, upon making it to the lowest of the floors involved in either tower, said that two lines could control that fire. that is to say that he could control the fire on the floor which was least involved, the floor where the fire would have to be under control before anyone could begin to tackle the fires further up, with two lines.
It seems to matter not to the TM that;
1) there seems to be no indication that he would have access to those two lines as water pressure in the building was down.
2) there is no further comminication indicating that anyone made it any higher in either tower
3) there are many photos showing very large fires on several floors of both towers and that both towers had many floors on fire at the same time moments after impact.

I know none of these things is seen as significant in any way to bill, for instance.

 

[sylvan8798]

Well, the 'two lines' reference comes from the firefighter who, upon making it to the lowest of the floors involved in either tower, said that two lines could control that fire. that is to say that he could control the fire on the floor which was least involved, the floor where the fire would have to be under control before anyone could begin to tackle the fires further up, with two lines.
It seems to matter not to the TM that;
1) there seems to be no indication that he would have access to those two lines as water pressure in the building was down.
2) there is no further comminication indicating that anyone made it any higher in either tower
3) there are many photos showing very large fires on several floors of both towers and that both towers had many floors on fire at the same time moments after impact.

I know none of these things is seen as significant in any way to bill, for instance.

This one always fries me. TM takes one quote indicating that 2 lines are needed for a particular location and concludes it must be true that these firemen could see and evaluate ALL THE FIRE IN THE BUILDING. Is this just poor reasoning, or is it willingly blind desperation?