Merged bullet hole in the windshield of JFK's limo/ You might be...

7forever - When you look at this pic

WallPaint265-1.jpg


and the compare it to this pic

Altgens6extremeclose-up.jpg


does it even occur to you how important CLEAR evidence is and why your blurry photos of photos (on a computer screen) are no good to use a evidenz?
 
I don't know. I wasn't even alive in 63.:D


There's clearly no need to take you seriously about anything, is there?

You are doing what every conspiracy theorist has done from time immemorial; you take it as read at the outset that "the man" (the government, big business, your history teacher, take your pick) is lying about a famous or infamous event (JFK, Moon Landing, 9/11) so you gather "evidence" (usually ridiculously blurry photographs and the testimony of clearly confused witnesses) and try to reverse engineer some unwieldy and illogical conspiracy theory that proves the "the man"'s story is a lie.

Don't be too hard on yourself, I believed in all sorts of arrant nonsense when I was your age. Unlike you and the YouTube generation however I lacked both the arrogance and the means necessary to broadcast my ignorance to the world.
 
Last edited:
Holy crap, that's the Altgens photograph! This whole time I honestly had no idea what that blurry picture was supposed to be. This is obviously a parody at this point because anybody this stupid would be incapable of turning on a computer.
 
tuc0, that is a fist - it's Kennedy's left hand as he's holding his arms in the famous elbows-out position that we've all seen after he had been shot through the neck.

ETA: And those are Jackie's white-gloved hands holding his left forearm.
Sorry, haven't been following the thread at all. I hid my fail in spoiler tags. It just seems insane to me to want to conclude anything from pixelated ancient stills. These truthers, JFK or otherwise, stare at those pictures of death so often and so obsessively they see anything they want. Anything at all. It scares me.
 
Last edited:
You know I take back what I said about 7 possibly being Jack. Jack's photo analytical skills are better than 7's, something I truly thought was impossible.
 
It just seems insane to me to want to conclude anything from pixelated ancient stills. These truthers, JFK or otherwise, stare at those pictures of death so often and so obsessively they see anything they want. Anything at all. It scares me.

You must not be familiar with the "Badge Man" interpretation of the Moorman photo. Take this photo:
Moorman2.jpg


Now zoom in on just that little section that's highlighted, and you can clearly see someone with a badge, firing a gun! Just like you can see a hole in the windshield of the Altgens photo!

Bman2.jpg


There's a high-res scan of this photo here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Moorman.jpg
 
Can we get a link, please?

Sure, here is one from 1-24-10
7forever@letsrollforum said:
The testimony that Greer gives about the entrance wound above the right eye would convict him with the help of the film and 70 witnesses, including him that the exit was on his right rear skull. The irony in this case is legendary and off the charts.

Greer is the only person in the world who had the front angle to create the massive exit wound. The grassy knoll is a red herring (A RIGHT SIDE SHOT) and obviously a shot from the back is proven false by the film. His exchange with Specter explains and confirms exactly what happened and the person who created those wounds (Greer) gives the testimony which any jury would find to be totally shocking and beyond ironic.
http://letsrollforums.com/showpost.php?p=171867&postcount=100

One from 2-1-10
The shot from the fence was fired because without it, the people near the limo would NOT have had an alternative location to place the shooter. The limo was 265 west of the building, therefore the people near the fatal shot would have known it was not from the building but right near the car. The driver fired at 313 and the person behind the fence was watching and fired immeditately after to give the illusion the shot was fired from the knoll. IT WAS A RED HERRING= something that distracts attention from the real issue.
The limo was 265 west of the building,IT WAS A RED HERRING= something that distracts attention from the real issue.
The witnesses were confused and that was taken by hundreds of authors and one huge movie and promoted as the location of the shooter. Everyone knows and says the shot came from in front of Kennedy but what they don't tell you is that the fence shot is an angle greater than 45 degrees making it a right side shot that COULD NOT have caused the right rear exit. Oliver Stone and that tool, Robert Grodin knew it was false and promoted a theory that kept the real truth from the masses.

The fence shot would have forced John's body and head right into Jackie. Watch how she's able to shove him off before she hops on the trunk. The force of his body from a right side shot would have slammed his body right into hers before she could do anything. That didn't happen because the shot came from Greer, forcing his body directly backward from the left leaning position he was in before the shot.
The fence shot would have forced John's body and head right into Jackie.That didn't happen because the shot came from Greer, forcing his body directly backward from the left leaning position he was in before the shot.
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=35740.0
If you follow that thread to the end you will see 7forever making the same "bullet hole" claims there, inspite of what he wrote there before.

Finally my favorite one (posted on 2-3-10) if only because of the site it is on.
7forever@stormfrontforums said:
Here, you can clearly see the gun over the passenger's head and the one in Greer's left hand by the door. What they had to do to stop his arm and hand from the crossing his chest and over his right shoulder was to replace those movements with fakery.

They did just that and without Kellerman's movments downward when Greer drew the gun over his right shoulder and then back when he shot, the goons would've had huge problems. It were Kellerman's movements to hide the view of the gun that made it possible to commit even the pathetic alteration back then.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=613173&page=17
 
Sure, here is one from 1-24-10

http://letsrollforums.com/showpost.php?p=171867&postcount=100

One from 2-1-10

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=35740.0
If you follow that thread to the end you will see 7forever making the same "bullet hole" claims there, inspite of what he wrote there before.

Finally my favorite one (posted on 2-3-10) if only because of the site it is on.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=613173&page=17

Interesting!
 
Sure, here is one from 1-24-10

http://letsrollforums.com/showpost.php?p=171867&postcount=100

One from 2-1-10

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=35740.0
If you follow that thread to the end you will see 7forever making the same "bullet hole" claims there, inspite of what he wrote there before.

Finally my favorite one (posted on 2-3-10) if only because of the site it is on.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=613173&page=17

Incredible! So the shots from the knoll were a red herring so that people would think that there was a conspiracy instead of a conspiracy. Brilliant!

How do these people manage to breathe?
 
Thank you, Mary!

The most relevant fact taken from Mary's fateful pic is the absence of the fake white over Roy's head. Thanks, Mary!LOL

WallPaint293.jpg

WallPaint292.jpg
 
Definately parody....

Come on 7 forever give it up now. This is all a joke right?
 
I wonder if JFK assasination nuts cite Oliver Stone's JFK film as being accurate?
 
Last edited:
You must not be familiar with the "Badge Man" interpretation of the Moorman photo. Take this photo:
[qimg]http://www.jfk-online.com/Moorman2.jpg[/qimg]

Now zoom in on just that little section that's highlighted, and you can clearly see someone with a badge, firing a gun! Just like you can see a hole in the windshield of the Altgens photo!

[qimg]http://www.jfk-online.com/Bman2.jpg[/qimg]

There's a high-res scan of this photo here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Moorman.jpg



Looks like a fat woman wearing boxing gloves..
 
The most relevant fact taken from Mary's fateful pic is the absence of the fake white over Roy's head. Thanks, Mary!LOL

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/WallPaint293.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/WallPaint292.jpg[/qimg]


I know this has been asked before but it bears repeating:

Why should we give any credence to the image analysis skills of someone who doesn't know how (and stubbornly refuses to learn how) to take a proper screen shot??
 
The most relevant fact taken from Mary's fateful pic is the absence of the fake white over Roy's head. Thanks, Mary!LOL

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/WallPaint293.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/WallPaint292.jpg[/qimg]

Judging by the title bar in that first picture there, I think it's obvious who'se using photoshop in this thread...

:-D

Trif
 
Thanks, Jimmy and a little black head!

Here's a pic of frame 337 by Altgens, from the rear, 5 seconds later showing the same defect. A littel black boy's head is what is mostly behind 255.
WallPaint279-1.jpg

Frame 255 from front.
WallPaint265-1.jpg

Notice the little black head behind bullet hole.
Altgens6extremeclose-up.jpg
 
Amazing how it follows the sharp line defining Kennedy's shoulder, almost as if it's something behind his shoulder.

Any luck coming up with that timeline where they changed out the windshield before parking at Parkland hospital?
 

Back
Top Bottom