Merged bullet hole in the windshield of JFK's limo/ You might be...
- Thread starter roundhead
- Start date
-
- Tags
- jfk assassination
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
Can we get a link, please?
Being treated with truth
I proved beyond any doubt the defect seen in 255 is the same defect captured in 337. No doubt whatsoever and any jury looking at this would conclude the same. It proves the little manufactured crack in the replacement windhshield was created afterward. That little crack would never show up in those photos because there was almost no frothing at all like in both altgens pics.
The crack is clearly right of the hole seen in 255 which all by itself proves it's fake. They very likely made the crack right of the mirror because 337 (from the rear) depicts the defect further away from the mirror and didn't understand the rear view appears to be further away from the mirrror than from the front view. It just isn't possible to cover up something of this magnitude and what I am showing so clearly is what happened in the Kennedy case. There will always be new researchers like myself discovering evidence that was missed. I have no idea if Weldon or Spritzer understood the pictures were corroboration or not.
The apparent hole seen clearly very close to the mirror at 255.
Arlen Specter threw a rock at this one.LOL This clearly has nothing to do with frame 255 or 337. It's a faint crack that would not show up clearly in either pic.
This red marker closely shows the fake crack right of the mirror from the front
The rear view shows how significantly leftward it is to the mirror.
Frame 337 is not consistent distance wise with the fake crack and of course a crack is NOT a frothing defect.
This distance in my pic is totally consistent with frame 337 and of course the shape of 255 and 337 are at least similar.
I proved beyond any doubt the defect seen in 255 is the same defect captured in 337. No doubt whatsoever and any jury looking at this would conclude the same. It proves the little manufactured crack in the replacement windhshield was created afterward. That little crack would never show up in those photos because there was almost no frothing at all like in both altgens pics.
The crack is clearly right of the hole seen in 255 which all by itself proves it's fake. They very likely made the crack right of the mirror because 337 (from the rear) depicts the defect further away from the mirror and didn't understand the rear view appears to be further away from the mirrror than from the front view. It just isn't possible to cover up something of this magnitude and what I am showing so clearly is what happened in the Kennedy case. There will always be new researchers like myself discovering evidence that was missed. I have no idea if Weldon or Spritzer understood the pictures were corroboration or not.
The apparent hole seen clearly very close to the mirror at 255.
Arlen Specter threw a rock at this one.LOL This clearly has nothing to do with frame 255 or 337. It's a faint crack that would not show up clearly in either pic.
This red marker closely shows the fake crack right of the mirror from the front
The rear view shows how significantly leftward it is to the mirror.
Frame 337 is not consistent distance wise with the fake crack and of course a crack is NOT a frothing defect.
This distance in my pic is totally consistent with frame 337 and of course the shape of 255 and 337 are at least similar.
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
Can you circle it? I have no idea what you are seeing and calling a hole. Also, please use a clear copy of the pic and not a photograph of a computer monitor.
Thanks.
Thanks.
JohnG
Pedantic Bore
Any theories as to why the conspirators used Oswald as a patsy but placed the shooter(s) in places where Oswald couldn't have shot from?
I can't quite make out the "apparent" hole in that unusually low quality photograph, but if it helps I think I spotted Nessie!
I can't quite make out the "apparent" hole in that unusually low quality photograph, but if it helps I think I spotted Nessie!
I do not think that the highlighted word means what you think it means...
ETA -
Fair point.PB2007 said:
CurtC
Illuminator
7forever, I'm another person who has no idea what hole you're talking about. I thought that you were saying that big white area well below the mirror was a hole. I don't see anything anywhere near the mirror, in the photo you're calling "255," that even someone with an active imagination could see as a hole.
No cracks and holes allowed in Parkland complex
I believe the story roundhead told about the kid's camera being confiscated. This picture would confirm very clearly both defects seen in 255. Lone nuts say there's a wagon wheel crack but there is obviously nothing in this pic except some horizontal lines. CIRCLE THE WAGON WHEEL.
I believe the story roundhead told about the kid's camera being confiscated. This picture would confirm very clearly both defects seen in 255. Lone nuts say there's a wagon wheel crack but there is obviously nothing in this pic except some horizontal lines. CIRCLE THE WAGON WHEEL.
RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
Even with it circled, I can't force myself to see that as a bullet hole. Are you sure it isn't someone's collar of their white shirt? Do you have anything other than a photograph of a computer monitor where it shows?
Also, you provided a picture of the limo at Parkland showing the wagon wheel crack. Can you provide a timeline for when the limo had it's windshield (with an alleged bullet hole) replaced between the fatal shots and being parked at Parkland with a wagon wheel crack?
ETA: you've posted more pics while I was typing. We both know you can see where the wagon wheel crack is but can you provide a timeline for when the limo had it's windshield (with an alleged bullet hole) replaced between the fatal shots and being parked at Parkland (allegedly with no damage at all).
Last edited:
Macgyver1968
Philosopher
I can't even tell what that image is supposed to be of, it's so blurry and pixelated. Although I do see Waldo in the right corner.
Or '73, '83. or '93, I'd wager. '03 would fit the handle and the level of forensic skilz.I don't know. I wasn't even alive in 63.
PB2007
This line left intentionally blank
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2007
- Messages
- 234
Funny how the government can arrange a top secret assignment like this and keep it a secret for years but can't get the faked evidence right. What's with that?
I think you'd believe anything you wanted to that supported your delusion. Seriously, what's with the blurry crap photos? How the flip are we meant to make out anything in half your photos?
Blood Spots - Are these real or fake then?
I think you'd believe anything you wanted to that supported your delusion. Seriously, what's with the blurry crap photos? How the flip are we meant to make out anything in half your photos?
Blood Spots - Are these real or fake then?
CurtC
Illuminator
Wow. By the way, I honestly didn't know what you were referring to. The lower edge of that white area is sharper, because that's where the shoulder of Kennedy's jacket is obscuring something lighter colored in the background. Whatever it is, that white spot that you've circled in blue is behind the limo, not on the windshield.
Again, here's a wider crop of the photo:
CurtC
Illuminator
tuc0, that is a fist - it's Kennedy's left hand as he's holding his arms in the famous elbows-out position that we've all seen after he had been shot through the neck.
ETA: And those are Jackie's white-gloved hands holding his left forearm.
Last edited: