Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I find the concept offensive! Now, if we could only get back to the discussion.
DOC, here are the outstanding points that need to be addressed.

1.) Ramsay clearly never thought Luke was the greatest historian.
2.) Jesus wasn't a historical character
3.) The president's religion (including Obama's) doesn't support of the validity of Christianity.
4.) Uh, something about Buddhism.
 
Can DOC please prove there was a historical Jesus instead of the mambo jumbo of the N/T? I wish for evidence outside of that very dubious book if you would, thanks.
 
Your honor, we are just trying to get to the truth here if you please!!
 
No leading the witness, please.


I think it's going to become more and more obvious who needs what here, as things progress. The game's not even afoot yet and the cheating has started.

On the upside, I can't even look at this thread without bursting out laughing, so that's got to be a good thing.

:)
 
I find the concept offensive! Now, if we could only get back to the discussion.
DOC, here are the outstanding points that need to be addressed.

1.) Ramsay clearly never thought Luke was the greatest historian.

Just one of the greatest.

2.) Jesus wasn't a historical character

Then you disagree with Hokulele's opinion and that of most historians.

3.) The president's religion (including Obama's) doesn't support of the validity of Christianity.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=104517
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom