Merged Has this structural engineer been debunked? / Astaneh-Asl "melting of girders"

A W Smith said:
I am a reader, I looked carefully for myself. And I have made my decision. Since rubber tired fire engines cannot physically drive through molten metal. It is sunlight.
Click to expand...

You are a professional..debunker I suspect and no innocent reader. Rubber tyres at a speed like that will go through a thin layer of molten steel with ease.
 
A W Smith said:
I am a reader, I looked carefully for myself. And I have made my decision. Since rubber tired fire engines cannot physically drive through molten metal. It is sunlight.
Click to expand...
Not to mention the fact that all that paper and the street itself would be on fire from the heat.

I'm convinced, Bills just ****ing with us now.
 
bill smith said:
You are a professional..debunker I suspect and no innocent reader. Rubber tyres at a speed like that will go through a thin layer of molten steel with ease.
Click to expand...

Why do you think its a shallow river of glowing molten steel rather than just sunlight?
 
Edx said:

Me:So why didnt anyone notice massive rivers of molten metal and buildings covered in the stuff?


You: They did Don't you remember ? ' Molten steel running like lava' (FDNY) Molten steel running down the walls of WTC6. Les Robertson and Mark Loiseaux among around 100 other eyewitnesses report molten steel. Try and remember this time. It really is a fact whether you like it or not.

Why lie Bill, why lie?
Click to expand...

Don't talk your usual rubbish. I said that witnesses report (on video) that steel ran down the wall in WTC6. That is not the same as buildings covered in molten steel.
 
bill smith said:
You are a professional..debunker I suspect and no innocent reader. Rubber tyres at a speed like that will go through a thin layer of molten steel with ease.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the Stundie, I hope you win. Tough competition this month.
 
Last edited:
Edx said:
Why do you think its a shallow river of glowing molten steel rather than just sunlight?
Click to expand...

Because it doesn't look like sunlight. It looks like molten metal. Let the readers maake their own decision.
 
bill smith said:
You are a professional..debunker I suspect and no innocent reader. Rubber tyres at a speed like that will go through a thin layer of molten steel with ease.
Click to expand...

What about the asphalt in the pavement?

Wouldn't the heat of the molten steel soften it to the point where the rubber tires just sink in?









LOL, LOL LOL
 
bill smith said:
Don't talk your usual rubbish. I said that witnesses report (on video) that steel ran down the wall in WTC6. That is not the same as buildings covered in molten steel.
Click to expand...

Then why did you reply to my question saying that yes, they did? Saying it really is a fact whether I like it or not? Go look at my question Bill.

Maybe you just don't care what anyone writes, is that it Bill?
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Because it doesn't look like sunlight. It looks like molten metal. Let the readers maake their own decision.
Click to expand...

Around we go...

The glowing stuff you are seeing on the road is also all over the buildings to the right, ergo you believe the buildings on the right to be covered in the same glowing substance....

... I call it sunlight.

Oh and where did anyone report these rivers of molten steel on roads Bill?
 
Last edited:
There's a lot of paper on the ground near the edge of the road, of which a bit surely would burn if that was molten metal. I see no smoke coming from there.

[ETA:] Furthermore, I seem to distinguish some papers also illuminated in the sunlit part.
 
Last edited:
Okay, bill. I'll bite. Why CAN'T that be sunlight? We've told you why we think it can't be molten metal, maybe you can tell us why you think it can't be sunlight.
 
Does anyone else find it odd that the "molten metal" was able to climb up the curb and down again?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom