Alrighty then...
I'd like to thank you "Akhenaten", for that last post. I just enjoyed it...
I would moreover like to thank "Marduk" for his genuine expertise and willingness to share, in this area of study.
JREF is my all time favorite internet resource. If someone here doesn't know the answer to one of my questions, they certainly know where to look. So, really thank all of you for your interest in my posts & retorts, it is greatly appreciated.
Now, in regards to the hatchet job you guys did on the deconstruction of my last post. I went through great efforts to avoid any specific claims that demanded refutation. I was hoping for something that we could all just agree upon. Please allow me to further explain myself.
I said:
...
The world over the ancients built huge monuments, "many" of which are aligned with astronomical movements and were built using the same basic shape. *(I stopped, right there. I didn't say EVERY monument was huge, aligned astronomically, or employed the same exact shape... If THAT were the case, I don't think there'd be no question, as to a sincere connection between two cultures.)
We have all sorts of examples, several of which have been here posted here. *(Again, no conclusions based on ill-conceived notions, just a statement of facts. There ARE examples here.)
Again, "many" of the ancient megalithic structures are similar even in the mastery of the stone work employed. Look closely at the fittings of Machu Pichu, Puma Punko, the Great Pyramid, these weren't structures thrown up over night. *(I never said anything about the materials being the same. I said that whomever did this, KNEW what they were doing, in regards to stone fittings. TODAY's construction culture is not equipped, trained, or presently capable of building these kinds of structures. We build wood framed homes, covered in brick, plaster, tile, siding, or some other protectant covering- in America. It would be easy to find a house in Maine and one in California of the same basic construction- indicating cultural contact. We no longer focus our energies producing huge stone structures. I am NOT saying that we couldn't do it, if we wanted to. Just that nowadays this isn't our thing. However, I DID say that the world over, this was the case. A long time ago, people spent a LOT of time and resources erecting masterfully connect HUGE stones. {Marduk,...Puma Punko was made of diorite, not sandstone.} My statement was that all across the world, stone mastery was not uncommon, and that many of these cultures were engaged in building long term project.)
The other major similarity they share is that we really DON'T know who built them, how they did it, or for what reason, or even for certain when it happened. We have 'lost' our ancient history. *(HERE is where the 'debate' should occur. Because I used the term "know". There are things that CAN be known for absolute certain. We can 'observe', repeatedly at what temperature distilled water freezes at sea level. KNOWING what happened yesterday, last week, last year, or a millennia ago, is another matter entirely. The building plans for the Empire State Building ARE still around. You can see every beam, bolt, board, and brick. We KNOW who designed it, and for what purpose. This documentation has escaped us, in regards to many of the ancient structures. 'Theories' based on 'shards' of historical evidence are just that 'theories'.)
Proof as to what has happened is lacking...so far. *(Marduk, could you post a picture of where the "Book of the Dead" was embossed on the Great Pyramid, indicating that you KNOW it's a tomb?)
I think, rather than closing the door to such notions as "lost civilizations", we should admit openly that this happened and that we don't know everything about those to erected these structures. Troy was real, before they decided to look for it. How do you expect to find something you aren't looking for? *(Here I was again hoping to open the debate door. We only have scattered bits and pieces of an "Atlantean world", this is far from proof of anything, but in my statement I propose the notion that you can't find what you aren't looking for. Meaning that we SHOULD be looking for this...)
Moreover, to conclude that ancient people had no global contact/awareness of other cultures is not something I am willing to do just yet. I'm not sure one could ever conclude that. How do you present proof of a non-event? *(I am NOT concluding ANYTHING about global contact/awareness. To say that you KNOW for absolute certain that it never happened is beyond arrogance. You MAY say, that thus far we've not seen concrete proof of such an as assertion. But it would be folly to say you KNOW it didn't happen.)
