You really are impervious to information, it seems
Why not read the thread if these basic facts are still escaping you?
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Amanda Knox guilty - all because of a cartwheel
- Thread starter Skeptic Ginger
- Start date
- Status
You really are impervious to information, it seems
Why not read the thread if these basic facts are still escaping you?
Weren't they given the option of when to turn up at the police station and decided to have dinner first arriving at the police station at 10pm?
Surely the defendents chose this? Also, didn't Amanda's initial questioning finish at around 1:45am and then she requested another interview a couple of hours later?
Is Amanda claiming that the second interview wasn't at her request? Perhaps that's an error of my memory. In any case, given that they didn't show up at the police station until 10pm, its hardly surprising that things went on late into the night.
Personally, at this point, I don't think its sensible to rely on anything she says without some kind of corroboration.
The insults make it clear you don't want to answer this simple question.
Why was Amanda being interrogated in the wee hours of the morning?
You are still avoiding the question.
Why was Amanda being interrogated in the wee hours of the morning?
If the prosecutors were simply looking for the truth, why couldn't it wait until everyone was rested and well fed?
I am not avoiding the question Kestrel. I am avoiding explaining things which have been explained clearly in this thread. Both Shuttit and Brodski have answered you but you seem more intent on getting me to run around trying to dispel your ignorance and compensate for your laziness. I don't choose to do it this time but is not as if you cannot remedy your lack of knowledge with a little effort
Was Amanda free to leave after her 1:30 AM statement?
I personally don't know. She was "retained in custody" at 5:45am the following morning, so I suspect probably not. Why does it matter?
She and he boyfriend chose the time they turned up at the police station, or do you dispute that?
She requested an additional meeting with the police at 3:30am, or do you dispute that?
Only if it's past their bedtimes. In the US nobody is ever arrested after 9:30pm (without permission from the suspects mother that they can sleep over).
Last edited:
Kestrel is not asking questions, people: he is making insinuations. Those who are interested can find the answers to his "questions" quite easily. But that is not his purpose. He is insulting the intelligence of his readers and I am tired of it
I just reread the above. The only people who may not have been well fed when the questioning began were the people asking the questions. Unless the claim now is that Amanda and Raffaele's were lying about having come from dinner to the police station?
Folks keep to the topic and lets not start getting personal.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic Posted By: Darat
Chris_Halkides
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2009
- Messages
- 12,980
police
We know that the police lied about whether or not Amanda went to the station voluntarily or not (http://perugia-shock.blogspot.com/2009/05/giobbi-i-gave-order.html). We know that the police have a dog-ate-my-homework excuse for why they did not record the interrogation. That gives their account of the interrogation little credibility.
We know that the police lied about whether or not Amanda went to the station voluntarily or not (http://perugia-shock.blogspot.com/2009/05/giobbi-i-gave-order.html). We know that the police have a dog-ate-my-homework excuse for why they did not record the interrogation. That gives their account of the interrogation little credibility.
Last edited:
Chris_Halkides
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2009
- Messages
- 12,980
Here is what Stone Phillips had to say about the Monster of Florence case (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19333195/ns/dateline_nbc-crime_reports/page/6/
), “We later checked his record and found that in fact Carlo had never been in jail during any of the monster killings. He and Giuttari were either mistaken or lying about that.”
), “We later checked his record and found that in fact Carlo had never been in jail during any of the monster killings. He and Giuttari were either mistaken or lying about that.”
OK. The police called them. They were eating in a pizzaria and went to the police station when they were done eating. I'm fine with that being what happened. Is the quibble here about whether only one, or both of them were asked to attend?
Fiona has already posted evidence that the UK police aren't required to record interviews with witnesses. Is this a "dog ate my homework attitude" as well?
From Amanda's testimony
My bolding. So Knox agrees with the police and Giobbi disagrees. But according to Perugiashock Giobbi wanted them to be interviewed together.
It seems that if he did issue this instruction it was not acted on: or perhaps he issued it but events overtook them ? Who knows? But Knox says she went with Sollecito and was not expected. And she says they had dinner with friends and not in a pizzeria. She is certainly a liar but we have the evidence of the cartwheels (remember them) to confirm that she was not in an interview room whlle she was waiting for Sollecito.
My bolding. So Knox agrees with the police and Giobbi disagrees. But according to Perugiashock Giobbi wanted them to be interviewed together.
It seems that if he did issue this instruction it was not acted on: or perhaps he issued it but events overtook them ? Who knows? But Knox says she went with Sollecito and was not expected. And she says they had dinner with friends and not in a pizzeria. She is certainly a liar but we have the evidence of the cartwheels (remember them) to confirm that she was not in an interview room whlle she was waiting for Sollecito.
Last edited:
- Status