• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Hardfire: Szamboti / Chandler / Mackey

thecritta said:
I would say that Tony is right and Mackey is wrong.

Come on just admit it Mackey there should have been a jolt.
Click to expand...

Wow. Cool. Anybody can play that game:

I would say that macky is right and Tony is wrong.
Come on just admit it Tony there should NOT have been a jolt.

See. I win!
 
its amazing. truthers beleive fireman can identify explosives by sound, yet can't evaluate the condition of building on fire. you don't get much more delusional.
 
thecritta said:
Thats probably what they told them to hide the fact that there going
to drop the buildings and down they go.

Just to cover the fact that they where going to drop the buildings.
Click to expand...

GREAT!!!

Then you can show us HOW they did this. A conventional Cd would take two ten men crews about 4 months do.

Of course it would also be unmistakable. It would be noticable. It would be loud. It would cause a seismic wave.

So it obviously wasn't a conventional CD. Great.

Now provide a method for the building to be "drop"ped that has NO ONE NOTICING it being wired, that has NO explosive sounds, that has NO seismic report and that leaves NO noticable debris.

Were there 20,000 ninja's with explosives on their backs who ran into a burning creaking building to wire it up? (since no one noticed anything before 9/11)?

Provide any type of narrative which would allow that to happen.
 
TruthersLie said:
GREAT!!!

Then you can show us HOW they did this. A conventional Cd would take two ten men crews about 4 months do.

Of course it would also be unmistakable. It would be noticable. It would be loud. It would cause a seismic wave.

So it obviously wasn't a conventional CD. Great.

Now provide a method for the building to be "drop"ped that has NO ONE NOTICING it being wired, that has NO explosive sounds, that has NO seismic report and that leaves NO noticable debris.

Were there 20,000 ninja's with explosives on their backs who ran into a burning creaking building to wire it up? (since no one noticed anything before 9/11)?

Provide any type of narrative which would allow that to happen.
Click to expand...

I think the only evidence you will ever get are his/her posts* right here on JREF.


*maybe a link to CT sites
 
funk de fino said:
In Manhattan, probably.

What difference does it make?
Click to expand...

Do you not think if somebody states as fact that wtc7 was the biggest office fire in history they should have to back that claim up?

Here, let me try:

The pentagon was the most secure building in the world.

Should I back that up or will you let it pass?
 
vinniem said:
Do you not think if somebody states as fact that wtc7 was the biggest office fire in history they should have to back that claim up?

Here, let me try:

The pentagon was the most secure building in the world.

Should I back that up or will you let it pass?
Click to expand...

Back it up if you can.

This is a derail. Both assertions are irrelevant to the understanding of what happened on 9/11.
 
BigAl said:
Back it up if you can.

This is a derail. Both assertions are irrelevant to the understanding of what happened on 9/11.
Click to expand...

No, the size of wtc7's fires are very relevant. Debunkers like to throw around claims that it was such a huge office fire to back up the NIST hypothesis.

The fires in wtc7 were not the biggest office fires in history. That is a lie.
 
BigAl said:
Back it up if you can.

This is a derail. Both assertions are irrelevant to the understanding of what happened on 9/11.
Click to expand...

So then why didn't you berate Sword when he quoted a post I made months ago?
 
vinniem said:
No, the size of wtc7's fires are very relevant. Debunkers like to throw around claims that it was such a huge office fire to back up the NIST hypothesis.

The fires in wtc7 were not the biggest office fires in history. That is a lie.
Click to expand...

You are, not surprisingly, missing the point....

The fires in WTC7 don't have to be the "biggest office fire in history" they just have to be big enough to contribute to the structural failure that actually happened on 9/11.

One more thing.....what is it with this label "debunkers"?

There aren't two groups of people...."truthers" vs "debunkers" its more like "truthers" vs "normal people who aren't incompetent or insane"....

There aren't really two factions here as if there is some war going on...there isn't. There is nothing to fight....truthers are running around attacking windmills while everyone else either laughs or shakes their head and shrugs them off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom