9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

Thnks for the photos...
The 'No Planers' will either dismiss the photos as fakes, or insist the plane wreckage was planted...
Quite a bit of plane wreckage-and body parts were found on the roof of the neaby Marriot Hotel, but No planers again insist the wreckage was planted, or never existed...
 
Last edited:
I don't spend my time obsessed with debunking Truthers- i just figured since I was in the 9/11 Conspiracies part of this message board, i could contribute something....As for those ghost hunter tv shows...funny should should mention it, I saw an episode recently, and was struck at how fake it was...A creak in the floorboard, or some muffleled noise makes them convinced ghosts are about. I think in due time SyFy Channel's main ghost trackers show (and the copycat shows) will be discredited. After all that fraud medium John Edward (who had the insipid 'Crossing Over' on sci fi channel) was exposed as a pure charlatan...
Anyway, sorry if my thread is old hat, I could just stick to reading the threads of others, and figure out which topics are the most interesting. Thanks for the feedback.


I'm a lifelong Titanic reseacher...and there is a conspiracy within that community that is...interesting- in that the Titanic never sank (and it was actually her near identical sister ship Olympic, deliberately rammed into the iceberg in an insurance scam).
At least 2 books have been written that promotes this conspiracy...The authors are dismissed as crackpots..

Well you sound like my kind of skeptic for sure!
I hope you enjoy your stay here!

Hey is it possible the Titanic could of been sunk by super nano thermite?
 
Well you sound like my kind of skeptic for sure!
I hope you enjoy your stay here!

Hey is it possible the Titanic could of been sunk by super nano thermite?

Well duh! You don't really believe that iceberg OCT, do you? I conducted an experiment. I hit an ice cube with a hammer, and the ice cube shattered to smithereens. The hammer was made of steel; the Titanic was made of steel. Therefore, the titanic would have shattered the iceberg to smithereens. Almost 100 years, and I'm the first person to realize we've been lied to all this time. God I'm smart. [/titanic truther]
 
My favourite no planer claim is 'store owners turned all their tvs to the windows so that all the people near ground zero were watching tv rather than watch the twin towers burn'

And what may we ask was on those T.Vs...?
 
Well duh! You don't really believe that iceberg OCT, do you? I conducted an experiment. I hit an ice cube with a hammer, and the ice cube shattered to smithereens. The hammer was made of steel; the Titanic was made of steel. Therefore, the titanic would have shattered the iceberg to smithereens. Almost 100 years, and I'm the first person to realize we've been lied to all this time. God I'm smart. [/titanic truther]

HA! HA! HA! You did it! You cracked super secret NWO code!
Unbelievable!
Bush(yeah I know he wasn't even born yet) must have had them(super secret dark OPs) test the super nano thermite on the Titanic first before setting his deadly aim on the WTC(yeah I know the towers weren't even built yet).
 
Well you sound like my kind of skeptic for sure!
I hope you enjoy your stay here!

Hey is it possible the Titanic could of been sunk by super nano thermite?



there is the therory that the shipbuilder secretly and deliberately used inferior grade steel in construction to save money..that ties into the 'brittle steel theory', but that has since been tested and rejected
 
there is the therory that the shipbuilder secretly and deliberately used inferior grade steel in construction to save money..that ties into the 'brittle steel theory', but that has since been tested and rejected

Titanic was constructed in the years when the shipbuilding industry was changing from iron to steel and Titanic was to be made of steel. There is a historian that has evidence that a load of iron rivets were used by mistake and they failed when steel rivets would have held.
 
Titanic was constructed in the years when the shipbuilding industry was changing from iron to steel and Titanic was to be made of steel. There is a historian that has evidence that a load of iron rivets were used by mistake and they failed when steel rivets would have held.


This theory has been tested and is by and larged rejected by Titanic scholars- Titanic's near identical sister Olympic was built with the same materials, and when scrapped in the 30s, did not show any severe indication of rivet or plate failure...
 
there is the therory that the shipbuilder secretly and deliberately used inferior grade steel in construction to save money..that ties into the 'brittle steel theory', but that has since been tested and rejected

Please, for the love of all that is good in the world, don't talk about shipbuilders in this forum.

The deluded people that believe no planes hit the towers are simply that and can never be convinced otherwise. It's like telling a cat to stop being a cat. No planers are for entertainment purposes only.

Welcome to the forum.
 
Please, for the love of all that is good in the world, don't talk about shipbuilders in this forum.

The deluded people that believe no planes hit the towers are simply that and can never be convinced otherwise. It's like telling a cat to stop being a cat. No planers are for entertainment purposes only.

Welcome to the forum.

Great to be here, I really like this site....
I wonder if any truthers out there might come up with the Titanic theory that no ship hit the iceberg?
 
Great to be here, I really like this site....
I wonder if any truthers out there might come up with the Titanic theory that no ship hit the iceberg?

I'm almost certain there are deniers that would make the claim there was no iceberg. Every CT comes with someone willing to make the most outrageous claims in order to draw attention to themselves. Comes with the territory as they say. Most of them are flinging poop, why would they stop to consider what it smells like?
 
This theory has been tested and is by and larged rejected by Titanic scholars- Titanic's near identical sister Olympic was built with the same materials, and when scrapped in the 30s, did not show any severe indication of rivet or plate failure...

One batch of iron rivets delivered to the Titanic work site could sink the Titanic and not show up in the deconstruction of the Olympic.

I'm referring to some naval archeology work done a couple years ago.
 
I'm a lifelong Titanic reseacher...and there is a conspiracy within that community that is...interesting- in that the Titanic never sank (and it was actually her near identical sister ship Olympic, deliberately rammed into the iceberg in an insurance scam).
At least 2 books have been written that promotes this conspiracy...The authors are dismissed as crackpots..


I remember there was a truther at Killtown's old forum, screen name was Lord Tunguska or something, who claimed that the Titanic disaster was engineered by the Jesuits. Does anybody remember that guy? He was always obsessed with Jesuits and how they "controlled everything." I think perhaps he had an unpleasant experience as an altar boy or something.
"Why are you always on about women, Stan? (obligatory Monty Python quote)

As to the OP. I think, as others have stated before, that all truthers are no-planers to a certain degree. The four planes that crashed on 9/11 are impossible for them to dismiss as the cause of the destruction of that day. All of their insane theories label one or more of the planes as either being nonexistant or unable to cause all of the damage done.
 
I'm a newbie, this is my first thread..This is a great site! If there is already an established 'No Planers' thread,my apologies....

In full agreement with and merely to add to what Rebel said, it's not about truth for them, it's about ego. It's the feeling of superiority they get by being the only ones who "get it" and "have it all figured out". The rest of the world is caught in the matrix and they are the only ones who can break out of their cocoons and offer salvation to everyone! It offers them the ability to be the hero, which is so obviously lacking in their lives, and also to be able to see what apparently no one else in the world can.

Not every "truther" is such a lowlife. There are certainly many who come on here and can offer at least civil debates. But no planers! Well, in the words of Penn Gilletee, that's a special kind of @##%&*!

From another relative newcomer, cheers and welcome!
 
Ok why cant we just get over NO PLANERS 911movement.org is gone or is it hmmmmm,
i have seen nothing of the 911 planers ot Tv Fakery i think it is finished and so
it Mr Killtowns so good bye no PLANERS and thankyou for you idiotic youtube video's
and you silly NPT and holographic plane theory HPT ummm errr yerrrrrr rightoooo then
good bye and goodluck but thankyou NOT for trying to destroy the 911truth movement
ya little COINTELPRO retards hahahaha you FAIL no plane failists = Mental Retards

:D:D:D
 
Ok why cant we just get over NO PLANERS 911movement.org is gone or is it hmmmmm,
i have seen nothing of the 911 planers ot Tv Fakery i think it is finished and so
it Mr Killtowns so good bye no PLANERS and thankyou for you idiotic youtube video's
and you silly NPT and holographic plane theory HPT ummm errr yerrrrrr rightoooo then
good bye and goodluck but thankyou NOT for trying to destroy the 911truth movement
ya little COINTELPRO retards hahahaha you FAIL no plane failists = Mental Retards

:D:D:D

What a masterly summary of the situation.
 
I suspect the WTC No Planers are a small minority fringe within the Truther movement, but the Pentagon and PA 'No Planers' seem to dominate their numbers- Most Truthers don't believe a plane went down in PA, and think the phone calls from the plane were fake- Then what do they think happened to the plane ? Do the PA no planers think the plane never existed, or it was landed somewhere else?
Most Truthers I've met insist a jet plane did not hit the Pentagon, so they are also 'No planers' in my book....

The WTC No planers seem to dominate Youtube, and I find their videos hilarious- in that they insist that nobody in NY or NJ saw planes hit the towers- despite the volumous evidence to the contrary...I think it's possible that some of them might actually be doing disinformation- because nobody is that stupid....
 
I suspect the WTC No Planers are a small minority fringe within the Truther movement, but the Pentagon and PA 'No Planers' seem to dominate their numbers- Most Truthers don't believe a plane went down in PA, and think the phone calls from the plane were fake- Then what do they think happened to the plane ? Do the PA no planers think the plane never existed, or it was landed somewhere else?
Most Truthers I've met insist a jet plane did not hit the Pentagon, so they are also 'No planers' in my book....

The WTC No planers seem to dominate Youtube, and I find their videos hilarious- in that they insist that nobody in NY or NJ saw planes hit the towers- despite the volumous evidence to the contrary...I think it's possible that some of them might actually be doing disinformation- because nobody is that stupid....

This is not correct. No Planers make a sizable percentage of Truthers, perhaps even a majority. But it depends on how we define the 'Truth Movement'.

The most active group that could be included in the Truth Movement is We Are Change. However, WAC promotes many brainless ideas in addition to 911 Truth. I include them in my discussions of the Truth Movement because they are what people here are referring to when they talk about demonstrations and protests. In fact, they are pretty much the only sign of 911 Truth outside the internet.

But as you point, on the net, a very large number of Truthers remain No Planers. Net-based Truthers who sit in their mom's basement pounding out posts on websites that no one reads are what most people here mean when they refer to the Truth Movement, although they probably never take part in public demonstrations. For example, the CIT brood appear to be No Planers. They post veraciously and make huge video presentations.They spend vast amounts of time searching for evidence that supports their ideas. Dealing with them consumes huge amounts of time for the members of JREF. They would never appear in a 911 Truth demonstration because they are organized by WAC who are not no planers, but they are much more representative of people whose lives are filed with 911 Truth.
 
Well duh! You don't really believe that iceberg OCT, do you? I conducted an experiment. I hit an ice cube with a hammer, and the ice cube shattered to smithereens. The hammer was made of steel; the Titanic was made of steel. Therefore, the titanic would have shattered the iceberg to smithereens. Almost 100 years, and I'm the first person to realize we've been lied to all this time. God I'm smart. [/titanic truther]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saHs6J0OXVI

Dude that's true. Watch. Know the Truth. Ice can't destroy steel.
 
Please, for the love of all that is good in the world, don't talk about shipbuilders in this forum.

The deluded people that believe no planes hit the towers are simply that and can never be convinced otherwise. It's like telling a cat to stop being a cat. No planers are for entertainment purposes only.

Welcome to the forum.

The deluded people that believe planes hit the towers are simply that and can never be convinced otherwise. It's like telling a cat to stop being a cat. Planers are willfully ignorant and for entertainment purposes only.
 

Back
Top Bottom