• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

POTUS Obama Reneges On Promise To Allow C-SPAN Access To Congress HC Negotiations?

Cicero

Banned
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
7,861
"President Obama, Senate and House leaders, many of your rank-and-file members, and the nation's editorial pages have all talked about the value of transparent discussions on reforming the nation's health care system. Now that the process moves to the critical stage of reconciliation between Chambers, we respectfully request that you allow the public full access, through television, to legislation that will affect the lives of every single American."

http://www.politico.com/static/PPM116_cspan.html

WHPS Gibbs answer regarding C-SPAN's request that candidate Obama live up to his promise suggests Lamb will be sheared by the Dems.

"I do not believe the American people have lacked for information on what's in these bills - the political and policy arguments around different people's positions - I think that's been well documented," Robert Gibbs
 
do we usually see reconciliation debates?

Did candidate Obama make any such caveat regarding his pledge guaranteeing transparent government and his promise to allow C-SPAN access to the legislative procedures on health care?
 
Plus the right has done the best it can to bring a case against transparency. With the outright lies about making private insurance illegal using out-of-context quotes from early bill, to claims that back-rolling the bill would be made illegal in the more recent bills, is all the more case against transparency. If the right could actually point to real mistakes in the bill that would be a better case for transparency. But so far the right has only used transparency for generating FUD with the bill text as a false attribution.
 
No. But Brian Lamb, being the "centrist" he pretends to be, is playing politics with his request.

What evidence, other than your own paranoia, do you have that Lamb is pretending to be something he is not, or that he is playing politics?
 
since when have Republicans given a **** about transparency in government?

it is THEIR President, who did not want an investigation into 9-11.

it is THEIR President, who wanted warrantless wiretaps.
 
Last edited:
Did candidate Obama make any such caveat regarding his pledge guaranteeing transparent government and his promise to allow C-SPAN access to the legislative procedures on health care?

I don't recall the plugs being pulled on the Cspan cams on the floor debates...that's where they usually are.

Cspan1=the House

Cspan2=the Senate

Cspan3=I don't get that one :confused:
 
I don't recall the plugs being pulled on the Cspan cams on the floor debates...that's where they usually are.

Cspan1=the House

Cspan2=the Senate

Cspan3=I don't get that one :confused:

"C-SPAN3, began broadcasting on January 22, 2001, and shows other government-related live events along with historical programming from C-SPAN's archives."
 
since when have Republicans given a **** about transparency in government?

If you believe that then what is your excuse for why libs don't give a **** about transparency in government when candidate Obama made that a cornerstone of his candidacy? Don't you want to see the pols inaction broadcasted during reconciliation?
 
If you believe that then what is your excuse for why libs don't give a **** about transparency in government when candidate Obama made that a cornerstone of his candidacy? Don't you want to see the pols inaction broadcasted during reconciliation?

There has been an increase in transparency.

And who knows, there might be C-SPAN at the reconciliation. The broken promise on this particular C-SPAN case is hingent on something that has yet to be commented upon. The C-SPAN sent the letter on the 30th of December. Your Gibbs quote is from last summer.

Furthermore: the letter isn't even addressed to the administration. It is addressed to the houses of Congress.
 
Last edited:
Obama's promise on transparancy in health care negotiations was broken when he made a deal with Big Pharma, this is old news.
How did that investigation turn out?
Huh? How does this follow from "Bush didn't want an investigation into 9-11?" What does it matter?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom