• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

My First Conspiracy Theory This "Terrorist Attack" is a set up

Lieberman has really turned out to be a right wing hawkish jerk. I suspect it has to do with pleasing his Jewish base, or being one or both. He seems to have the view we should bomb the Arab community out of existence.

Uh-huh...

Suppose Obama had just publically supported striking Bosnia (like Clinton did). Now, imagine the following 'analysis' of Obama's hypothetical action:

Obama has really turned out to be a left-wing hawkish jerk. I suspect it has to do with pleasing his Black base, or being one or both. He seems to have the view we should bomb White people out of existence.

Reality is thattaway, skeptigirl. ----->
 
Last edited:
As for the first guy being a fabricated person, that is absurd. The conspiracy would have to involve all the people on the plane and the hospital they took the guy too for his burns. And what would be the point?

How do you figure they'd all have to be in on it?

I figured the setup was more of the 'terrorist' didn't properly mix the chemicals on purpose. It's a scare, but not a terribly deadly one. After all, why wait till a mere 1hr before landing on a long international flight? If the goal is really to take a flight out (with few to no survivors), why not do it mid-Atlantic?

ETA: Note that I'm not a conspiracy theorist at all. But, seriously, let's at least be skeptical before we just wave our hands in dismissal...
 
Last edited:
It's my understanding the second guy was just ill, stayed in the bathroom for an hour and cursed at the stewards who asked him to come out. I'm pretty sure he's been released and not charged with any plane attack.


Lieberman has really turned out to be a right wing hawkish jerk. I suspect it has to do with pleasing his Jewish base, or being one or both. He seems to have the view we should bomb the Arab community out of existence.


As for the first guy being a fabricated person, that is absurd. The conspiracy would have to involve all the people on the plane and the hospital they took the guy too for his burns. And what would be the point?

Why would it have to involve all the people on the plane? If the guy worked for the CIA or whatever, he gets on a plane and acts like a terrorist, choosing to detonate "firecrackers" which really wouldn't do damage enough to hurt anyone. He gets caught in front of all the passengers during a holiday season where many people are flying. The public freaks and voila, Lieberman is on the road to Yemen.
 
Yes, but WHY would we be going after Yemen again? Last I heard, while there are some terrorist training camps there, Yemen doesn't support terrorism as blatantly as countries like Iran do.

I may be out of date with that information though, but I still don't know of any reason why we would suddenly feel the need to attack YEMEN of all places.
 
No but seriously I don't know if it's because I don't watch television but when I went out to the pub today and saw the media frenzy over the alleged terrorist attack I had an inner churchlady moment of "how conveeeeeeeeeeeeenient"

Yeah, everyone knows we want more Tiger Woods stories.

Maybe they can get a picture of Tiger Woods with Kate Gosslin.
 
I'm a little puzzled about the whole preemptive deal. The more this plays out the more I'm sure its a set up.
 
I don't understand what would be gained from this being set up. So Joe took the opportunity to "pretend" like he was concerned about Americas well being on the back of a failed terrorist attack for some media face time for some extra votes. Also, wouldn't you think it would sound more like a CT if the President or someone a little higher on the food chain said that about Yemen?

Not to mention al-Qaeda claimed responsibility and we are already trying to fight them so the only other windfall from this is you might have to pull down your pants at the airport more often and you won't be able to use a laptop or something.
 
al-Qaeda of course is going to take responsibility of any sort of terror attack failed or otherwise. Why not? Even if they just think the guy was trying to do it they'll take what they can get.

I think that the "windfall" is basically scare tactics to make Americans less contrary to our wars.
 
You
have a problem with this whole "You need evidence for your theories" thing. it seems.

Well how am I supposed to get evidence sitting on my butt here in NYC of an event that just happened that totally is being covered up by the CIA?

How can I prove that someone is lying if top officials are in on it? Haven't you seen The Firm? If I start poking around they will likely kidnap my family or something. It's better to just get the word out on the internet until someone breaks..

:k:
 
Last edited:
Right! That's what I think. I was blown away (excuse the pun) when I saw Liberman's "preemptive crap."

I think the "terrorists" in these cases are CIA plants or FBI or whoever does that these days.

Maybe the queen?
 
How do you figure they'd all have to be in on it?

I figured the setup was more of the 'terrorist' didn't properly mix the chemicals on purpose. It's a scare, but not a terribly deadly one. After all, why wait till a mere 1hr before landing on a long international flight? If the goal is really to take a flight out (with few to no survivors), why not do it mid-Atlantic?

ETA: Note that I'm not a conspiracy theorist at all. But, seriously, let's at least be skeptical before we just wave our hands in dismissal...

Maybe he was so scared to blow himself up, he kept stalling and stalling until the last minuet but then fluffed it.
 
Yes, but WHY would we be going after Yemen again? Last I heard, while there are some terrorist training camps there, Yemen doesn't support terrorism as blatantly as countries like Iran do.

I may be out of date with that information though, but I still don't know of any reason why we would suddenly feel the need to attack YEMEN of all places.

Yemen dont have nukes(as far as I know) nor are they developing any. Thats the kind of country we wanna pick a fight on!!
 
Well how am I supposed to get evidence sitting on my butt here in NYC of an event that just happened that totally is being covered up by the CIA?

How can I prove that someone is lying if top officials are in on it? Haven't you seen The Firm? If I start poking around they will likely kidnap my family or something. It's better to just get the word out on the internet until someone breaks..

:k:

You could wrap tin foil around your head to stop them from stealing your thoughts....Damn CIA.
 
It's just totally out of left field to preemptively attack Yemen. And more to the point is if we say "Let's go for Yemen!" then the public will ease off of the idea of getting out of Afghanistan. Staying in Afghanistan and Iraq will then become the status quo rather than the problem.

I think in someway there is a lot going on behind the scenes that the public is clueless about. So they give us media justification instead of real information.


Plus this guy looks straight out of Brooklyn and you can see how when he holds his hands he's got the CIA move going.
It's a conspiracy to oppressed the dissenters!
 
It's just totally out of left field to preemptively attack Yemen. And more to the point is if we say "Let's go for Yemen!" then the public will ease off of the idea of getting out of Afghanistan. Staying in Afghanistan and Iraq will then become the status quo rather than the problem.

I think in someway there is a lot going on behind the scenes that the public is clueless about. So they give us media justification instead of real information.


Plus this guy looks straight out of Brooklyn and you can see how when he holds his hands he's got the CIA move going.
It's a conspiracy to oppressed the dissenters!

Maybe he was just trying to warm the plane up a bit?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom