The no-plane fraud/nonsense, like the beam-weapon fraud, are so far out it is amazing people are gullible enough to repeat or support the claim.
In the last video the statement "almost all pieces of evidence were quickly removed". This is delusional since it took months to clean up the WTC. The delusions of no-planes start off with idiotic lies.
Oops, someone is studying the evidence that was "quickly removed"; for study? lol
It is sad to see pure ignorance at work, the nose goes in and an engine comes out. The fiberglass nose is gone on impact and the landing gear and engine, made of steel, do substantial damage and parts are ejected from the WTC.
How was an engine ejected from the WTC in the no plane delusion?
What amount of physics would it take to calculate where the engine should fall? How do you throw an engine out of the WTC during a fuel air mixture ignition? How did they get the engine to be at operation temperature above 800 degrees centigrade for the exhaust and throw it from the WTC tower? Seem like the big lie is the delusion held by a minority of people who prefer to tell lies than to suffer learning physics.
Sad these few fringe crack pots who came up with the nose-out scam failed to take the hard courses to round out their education but instead revert to spreading lies based on delusions they invent out of a paranoid mind that lacks knowledge.
Three videos prove there are some super stupid ideas out there and debunk the nose-out no plane crowd.
I took kids into simulators, they were able to hit targets 100 percent of the time and they never had flown before. The claims by a few idiot pilots who can't hit buildings in the safely of a simulator make them liars and/or the worse pilots in the world. Looks like poor flying skills of the terrorist got 75 percent, the only pilots worse claim to be at p4t and signed up to Balsamo's 2223G madness of no plane at the Pentagon, or some similarly redials delusional babble. Why would pilots say they can't hit a 207 foot wide building when they have to land on 150 foot runways? Does anyone want to land with those idiots? And the Pentagon is so big you have to be asleep to miss hitting it, and what do you know, Hani was only 16 to 30 feet away from crashing into the over pass.
Why would no plane supporters be talking about pilots? In what planes do no planers put their pilots who can't fly into buildings? The fact if a pilot can't hit a building a target at high speed then they should not be flying let alone make up lies and delusions about 911, the only thing they do with ease.
Last edited:
