• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

KSM Conspiracy Charges Analyzed and Debunked

Galileo said:
I put Barrett on as a co-author. Barrett is a BIG name. That ought to get the attention of the legal community.

I assume the defense team has google alerts.

Tell me how KSM got the nano-thermite into the WTC?
Click to expand...

There is no nanothermite there. None, ever.
 
Galileo said:
Every time you get behind the wheel, you endanger society. You could be the next sober driver to maim or almost kill an innocent victim.

Most traffic deaths are caused by the increasing problem of sober drivers.
Click to expand...

A sober person, reguardless of the fact, they are SOBER enough not to make any mistakes.

I'm pretty sober right now, same thing with everyone here, that can type a post without messing up their words.

You get a drunk person on here, it'll take them a while before they can respond plus some of their words are messed up.

Unless you're saying that you get plastered every day from drinking Rolf? If that's the case stop drinking, you're killing off what's left of your brain cells.
 
Originally Posted by Galileo

Tell me how KSM got the nano-thermite into the WTC?

truly better then "Must See TV"

:)
 
Galileo said:
Every time you get behind the wheel, you endanger society. You could be the next sober driver to maim or almost kill an innocent victim.

Most traffic deaths are caused by the increasing problem of sober drivers.
Click to expand...

You actually believe the crap you post don't you rolf?
you would say anything to justify your miserable life.

GO LIVE WITH THE TALIBAN BEFORE YOU KILL SOMEONES DAUGHTER,MOTHER,SISTER,SON, FATHER OR BROTHER.
 
Galileo said:
Every time you get behind the wheel, you endanger society. You could be the next sober driver to maim or almost kill an innocent victim.

Most traffic deaths are caused by the increasing problem of sober drivers.
Click to expand...

National Institutes of Health says that before there was a campaign to treat and rid the roads of drunken drivers, that 60% of traffic deaths were alcohol related.

after they got the Rolfe Lindgrens of the world off the roads, the statistic improved to just 40% of traffic deaths being alcohol related.


http://www.nih.gov/about/researchresultsforthepublic/AlcoholRelatedTrafficDeaths.pdf
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Galileo
Every time you get behind the wheel, you endanger society. You could be the next sober driver to maim or almost kill an innocent victim.

Most traffic deaths are caused by the increasing problem of sober drivers.

you know, trolling is bad for your health.
 
A W Smith said:
they might give him 72 bar flies instead.
Click to expand...

He would eat them, thinking they were flying rasins.:D


Drinking too much alcohol leads to brain shrinkage.

xray.jpg


This will happen to rolf one day.

( any resemblance to homer simpson is purely coincidental)
 
A W Smith said:
National Institutes of Health says that before there was a campaign to treat and rid the roads of drunken drivers, that 60% of traffic deaths were alcohol related.

after they got the Rolfe Lindgrens of the world off the roads, the statistic improved to just 40% of traffic deaths being alcohol related.


http://www.nih.gov/about/researchresultsforthepublic/AlcoholRelatedTrafficDeaths.pdf
Click to expand...

Wrong, you use spin. What has happened is that the public has grown acceptive of sober driving, forgetting its dangers. As a consequence, the rate of traffic deaths by caused sober drivers has jumped from 62% to 87%. Sober driving is now a much bigger problem than in the past!

I am not a hypocrite. I am in favor of re-legalizing non-sober driving and referring the rare few accidents that do occur to the civil courts, absent and proof of criminal intent to cause harm or an actual victim.

I speak for the millions of Americans who have been injured by a sober driver.

Does anyone have any intelligent comments about the alleged 169 overt acts?
 
Last edited:
Galileo said:
Wrong, you use spin. What has happened is that the public has grown acceptive of sober driving, forgetting its dangers. As a consequence, the rate of traffic deaths by caused sober drivers has jumped from 62% to 87%. Sober driving is now a much bigger problem than in the past!

I am not a hypocrite. I am in favor of re-legalizing non-sober driving and referring the rare few accidents that do occur to the civil courts, absent and proof of criminal intent to cause harm or an actual victim.

I speak for the millions of Americans who have been injured by a sober driver.

Does anyone have any intelligent comments about the alleged 169 overt acts?
Click to expand...

What did he spin? I saw nothing of what he spun!

"I am in favor of re-legalizing non-sober driving" - So you'd allow drunks driving on our roads?
 
Last edited:
Galileo said:
Wrong, you use spin. What has happened is that the public has grown acceptive of sober driving, forgetting its dangers. As a consequence, the rate of traffic deaths by caused sober drivers has jumped from 62% to 87%. Sober driving is now a much bigger problem than in the past!

I am not a hypocrite. I am in favor of re-legalizing non-sober driving and referring the rare few accidents that do occur to the civil courts, absent and proof of criminal intent to cause harm or an actual victim.

I speak for the millions of Americans who have been injured by a sober driver.
Click to expand...

Wrong, Rolf. You have never been injured by a sober driver. You are a troll and a menace to society.
 
Galileo said:
Wrong, you use spin. What has happened is that the public has grown acceptive of sober driving, forgetting its dangers. As a consequence, the rate of traffic deaths by caused sober drivers has jumped from 62% to 87%. Sober driving is now a much bigger problem than in the past!

I am not a hypocrite. I am in favor of re-legalizing non-sober driving and referring the rare few accidents that do occur to the civil courts, absent and proof of criminal intent to cause harm or an actual victim.

I speak for the millions of Americans who have been injured by a sober driver.
Click to expand...

Only an insane person would agree to that.
i'm afraid rolfs brain has already shrunk to the size of a peanut.
 
Last edited:
cyclonic said:
Only an insane person would agree to that.
Click to expand...

Riding horses drunk 100 years ago was legal, what's the big deal if a few people today do it with cars.

It's none of your business what other people are doing in the privacy of their own space.

There is no right to safe roads listed in the Bill of Rights.

:boggled:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom