8 out of 8 at Citgo station

Come on CE, doesn't the MASSIVE amount of evidence that supports the plane impacting into the Pentagon get you any pause at all? You realize that it all has to be faked for CIT to be right, don't you? I can't for the life of me imagine how that could have all been choreographed.

I guess I just don't have a big enough imagination.
 
Childlike Empress said:
When the Pentacon came out, i washed it away and think i even stated on this forum that perhaps CIT was spoonfed false information by the Pentagon Policemen. By now, this explanation makes no sense to me. I consider your theory less likely or at least not more plausable than CITs. But as i said, i'm not versed on the minutiae. I just recognized after watching NSA a few months ago that we have a huge problem with contradicting witness testimony here. There we agree.
Click to expand...

Ah, well... minutiae aside, the evidence is only of south path impact, so however these north path/ONA/etc witness readings (only in a few cases is that really what they said) occurred, they don't do anything much to counter the better evidence or even SUGGEST a remotely plausible alternative. As the others here understand and enjoy explaining. They're all right, partially, and CIT not in the slightest.

For example - many of the same witnesses they used, when read better (by me) help flesh out this impressive list of explicit south path impact eyewitnesses.
http://frustratingfraud.blogspot.com/2008/08/south-path-impact-documented.html

Your first instincts were correct. Well, justified anyway. Everything past there is a few isolated weird accounts but mostly heaps of CIT distortions.

ETA: and to the OT question, I suspect 9K misread 3 as 8 somewhere.
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
Your problem, not mine. Video is still on page one.
Click to expand...
Your lack of knowledge is your problem. The video is poppycock.

It has p4t failed physics; this is pathetic. Don't you know math?

The video verifies 77 impacted by providing evidence where the wing impacted. Idiots like CIT are self debunking at least they take a stand; they are willing to spew delusions not mindlessly present them as an excellent job.

GEdetective615.jpg

The best thing about CIT, they present the information that debunks their idiotic delusional claims. Saying the video is a good presentation is like saying dog poop for dinner was presented well; what did they pay you to say the presentation was excellent? The video is full of failed ideas and outright lies. Flight 77 almost hit the VDOT tower, it was not at 699 feet MSL (ASL). You prefer lies over reality; it is your problem you love delusional videos produced by idiots.
 
Caustic Logic said:
Your first instincts were correct. Well, justified anyway. Everything past there is a few isolated weird accounts but mostly heaps of CIT distortions.
Click to expand...


I made myself loosely familiar with your work after watching NSA. As i said, it's unconvincing. Just thought i point out what it implies, because reading the last thread where it came up, i chuckled at the duhbunkies cheering you without knowing your deviant ways. ;)
 
Childlike Empress said:
... duhbunkies ... ;)
Click to expand...
You claim the CIT "an excellent job in presenting it", but the content is false information, lies and delusions. Did you comprehend the video? Wait, you don't do details; does that lead to your flaccid support for CIT?

You can't support a single claim made by CIT. 8 years of failure by CIT and you are supporting it by parody? Presenting their moronic video only strengthens your failed positions on 911, whatever they are for unlike CIT you remain uncommitted and unable to make a conclusion save the irony of praising the excellent job CIT does presenting lies and delusions.

You are self debunked as you attack armed with moronic conclusions and failed logic. ... duhbunkies would be a great insult if you had some evidence to support the failed weakly defined positions you take on 911.
 
dtugg, you are on the best way to becoming a man. That was several hours you managed not to post "funny" photoshops. Respect!

beachnut said:
You claim the CIT "an excellent job in presenting it", but the content is false information, lies and delusions.
Click to expand...
Childlike Empress said:
Regardless of ones opinion of their argument, they do an excellent job in presenting it
Click to expand...


beachnut, beachnut... *shakes head*
 
dtugg said:
Yeah, what better way of convincing people that no plane hit the Pentagon than by using witnesses who say that a plane hit the Pentagon! :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
If you want a delusional lies and false information, CIT is the best at presenting it. He, CE is right CIT are the best at presenting dirt dumb ideas on video; they do it effortlessly.
 
Childlike Empress said:
dtugg, you are on the best way to becoming a man. That was several hours you managed not to post "funny" photoshops. Respect!
*
Click to expand...

I also got to hand it to him, because most of the best photoshops of Shaky and the Buffet slayer come from truthers.

Because truthers HATE the farking no planers at the Pentagon.

CE, when did you become a no planer?
 
dtugg said:
Yeah, what better way of convincing people that no plane hit the Pentagon than by using witnesses who say that a plane hit the Pentagon! :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Don't you remember? It works both ways for them. When all else fails pull as switcheroo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom