Davidlpf
Muse
Just facing reality, not embracing.Which is a problem to be fixed, not embraced.
Just facing reality, not embracing.Which is a problem to be fixed, not embraced.
SO since a fair few people (myself included) here agree that she is not the sharpest tool in the shed, WHY IS THERE ANY KIND OF SUPPORT for her as a possible candidate to run the country? Like what goes through the minds of people who would vote for her? I just don't get it.
TAM![]()
Yeah that one seems to be a fuzzy point. She says she quit because the frivolous suits were bankrupting her (and the state of Alaska). I understand that she would be responsible for paying for any lawsuits - not sure how much the State would be responsible for.
Seems she was in a damned if she did, damned if she didn't spot. Not an enviable spot to be in - especially as a politic figure.
Geeze TAM have you not read any right-wing blogs, papers or listened to any right-wing programs? Many LOVE her. AS you mentioned - she's a mom, a good parent, and not only that but she:
hunts, can shoot her own moose, dresses it, drives a pick-up (maybe), does dishes, laundry, gave birth 5 times, breast fed, changed diapers, was a mayor, govenor, and was slated as VP for McCain. Oh and she loves Jesus.
She's not a pansy woman in eyes of many republicans. She spoke of herself as a "pitbull with lipstick". That appeals to many people.
Momulist?She's a populist.
Geeze TAM have you not read any right-wing blogs, papers or listened to any right-wing programs? Many LOVE her. AS you mentioned - she's a mom, a good parent, and not only that but she:
hunts, can shoot her own moose, dresses it, drives a pick-up (maybe), does dishes, laundry, gave birth 5 times, breast fed, changed diapers, was a mayor, govenor, and was slated as VP for McCain. Oh and she loves Jesus.
She's not a pansy woman in eyes of many republicans. She spoke of herself as a "pitbull with lipstick". That appeals to many people.
Not a cunnilinigist?Momulist?![]()
TAM, you can't be president, you're Canadian!![]()
lol...C'est la vie.
Not a cunnilinigist?
All that is required for an American president:Here is what I consider important qualities for the leader of the most powerful country on the planet (well maybe outside of China these days)...in order of importance.
1. Superior Intelligence.
2. Intellectual Curiosity at a WORLD level.
3. Understands and respects the responsibilities and obligations of representing a super-power.
4. Superior Communicator
5. Able to listen and process information at a high level.
6. Superior Charisma
7. Able to rally people behind him/her through inspiration.
Now she may have a couple of these, but given the above, you can see why Sarah is not anywhere on my list.
TAM![]()
Are we talking about Palin running for President or becoming President? I'm all for one, but totally against the other.
I guess because I consider "cunning" to be a deceptive trait, such as the use of deception or trickery to obtain things, rather then doing so honestly or with pure smarts.
TAM![]()
All that is required for an American president:
Intelligent
35 or older
Puts America first
Can think long term (which means making good deals and good allies)
Understands fiscal responsiblity
Understands strategy
Speaks clearly
Can lead
That's it.
DR
But when dealing with our enemies (as in actual enemies, not merely political opponents), isn't deception entirely appropriate?
Exactly! We've suffered (and are STILL suffering, thanks to his policies) through 8 years of a President who was sold as a folksy, "common-sense" man who people "wanted to have a beer with."
Sorry, but the best and the brightest should be the people making the big decisions. I'd rather have the "elitist intellectuals" running things than the collection of knuckle-dragging clods that are currently in charge.
Hell, if I could amend the U.S. Constitution, I would require a politician have a PhD from an accredited university before being allowed to run for federal office. Several if you want to be president.
If you want to vote... Bachelors degree at least!