Some of them must have been in on it, or at the very least they kept quiet after the fact.
Please don't shoot the messenger.
Edited by Gaspode:
Removed breach of Rule 12
Last edited by a moderator:
Some of them must have been in on it, or at the very least they kept quiet after the fact.
Please don't shoot the messenger.
Are you sure I'm the one you should be making this case to? I suggest you contact the writers of the International Building Code and inform them with justification that their requirements on fire protection have no merit. I'm sure if your being truthful they'll seriously consider the implications of what you're saying, well providing anyway that your statement isn't of course a bald assertion or one of ignorance.They should have eliminated the impossible, which includes a fire-induced progressive collapse.
Some of them must have been in on it, or at the very least they kept quiet after the fact.
Please don't shoot the messenger.
They should have eliminated the impossible, which includes a fire-induced progressive collapse.
Some of them must have been in on it, or at the very least they kept quiet after the fact.
Please don't shoot the messenger.
Some of them must have been in on it, or at the very least they kept quiet after the fact.
Some of them must have been in on it, or at the very least they kept quiet after the fact.
I'll give you this much bardamu, as despicable as your allegations are, at least you've got the courage of your convictions (if lacking the courage to act on them), and at least enough cognitive capacity to go where a controlled demolition scenario would logically have to take you.
Some of them must have been in on it, or at the very least they kept quiet after the fact.
Please don't shoot the messenger.
They should have eliminated the impossible, which includes a fire-induced progressive collapse.
No one is shooting anyone here. Though you may want to avoid Farrell's Bar in New York City:
Firefighters and their unions don't hesitate to demand that safety issues be addressed. At Farrell's bar in Brooklyn, which is a firefighter and cop hangout, I asked one of New York's Bravest how he would respond to someone who said the 9/11 first responders were keeping quiet about what killed their brothers. He laughed, shook his head, and said, "There better not be a Halligan around. I'd put it through his <CENSORED> skull." At the center of Farrell's back bar stands a cross made from WTC steel and a portrait of longtime Farrell's bartender Vinny Brunton, a FDNY Captain with Ladder 105, who died on 9/11.
Firefighters don't appreciate people spewing that kind of hateful ignorant garbage about them and the honored dead. I'm surprised (and impressed) that Triforcharity held back as much as he did.
They should have eliminated the impossible, which includes a fire-induced progressive collapse.
Are you implying that the NIST should have also looked into space beams and missiles? Why not earth quakes? THe WTC collapses registered on the Richter scale after all. Maybe the NIST should have investigated those too. Naw, could never be due to something a little more obvious than having a series of engineering disasters from an intentional terrorist attack right?...
they didn't think of death beams from outer space because they are not morons.
Well red? What are your thoughts? I'm a curious guy...
Your questions are hypothetical and disingenuous, why would I respond to them?
What? You mean like more disingenuous than first time occurrences being impossible?
PLEASE, I am BEGGING you provide me with another "explosive" which can cut steel beams that is silent.
I'll wait for it. ANY explosive capable of cutting those beams. I'd love to know what it is.
Really. That is what you have? That is it?
super duper stealth explosives? Really?
It would help if you PROPOSED ANYTHING besides for just JAQing off. PROPOSE something.
Bump for red ibis. Come on... answer the questions. Don't run away again.
Please provide an example of any explosive capable of cutting steel silently.