Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
triforcharity said:
This one?

[qimg]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h131/triathlete247/5277x.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h131/triathlete247/911_devistation2-1.jpg[/qimg]

Or that one? I think I got those both from you anyway
Click to expand...

Wow....look at that "neat" pile that "fell into it's own footprint"....:oldroll:
 
I love to post this one to defy the dolts of the footprint of WTC 7.

This is Fitterman Hall, and was across the street of WTC 7. Look at the ROOF!!

414px-Fiterman_hall_damage-1.jpg


911_HighQualityPhotos7784.jpg


These are fun.

FEMAphoto_WTC-012.jpg


I have lots more. LOTS more. Just, none uploaded to PB yet.
 
Whats missing from these photos?

Well its the team of 10,000 forensic specialists removing the dust and steel a spoonfull at a time.!
 
Bluesky said:
Whats missing from these photos?

Well its the team of 10,000 forensic specialists removing the dust and steel a spoonfull at a time.!
Click to expand...

Since the steel was liquid they just rigged up some hi-temp pumps and pumped it into insulated tank trucks.
 
I see that today is the first day of the British enquiry into the Iraq war and that it has already emerged that the Whitehouse was talking about regime change in Iraq in early 2001. Several months before 9/11.
 
bill smith said:
I see that today is the first day of the British enquiry into the Iraq war and that it has already emerged that the Whitehouse was talking about regime change in Iraq in early 2001. Several months before 9/11.
Click to expand...

So what? Most people thought that getting Saddam out would be a good thing for the Iraqi people and the world.
 
bill smith said:
I see that today is the first day of the British enquiry into the Iraq war and that it has already emerged that the Whitehouse was talking about regime change in Iraq in early 2001. Several months before 9/11.
Click to expand...
Which is proof of nothing.

And I was vehemently against that war BTW.
 
bill smith said:
I see that today is the first day of the British enquiry into the Iraq war and that it has already emerged that the Whitehouse was talking about regime change in Iraq in early 2001. Several months before 9/11.
Click to expand...

That is not news, 9/11 made a workable excuse for invading a very oil rich country. Why should they not use it?
 
clueless

Iraq Liberation Act of 1998.

Iraq admitted, among other things, an offensive biological warfare capability, notably, 5,000 gallons of botulinum, which causes botulism; 2,000 gallons of anthrax; 25 biological-filled Scud warheads; and 157 aerial bombs. And I might say UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq has actually greatly understated its production.... Over the past few months, as [the weapons inspectors] have come closer and closer to rooting out Iraq's remaining nuclear capacity, Saddam has undertaken yet another gambit to thwart their ambitions by imposing debilitating conditions on the inspectors and declaring key sites which have still not been inspected off limits.... It is obvious that there is an attempt here, based on the whole history of this operation since 1991, to protect whatever remains of his capacity to produce weapons of mass destruction, the missiles to deliver them, and the feed stocks necessary to produce them. The UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq still has stockpiles of chemical and biological munitions, a small force of Scud-type missiles, and the capacity to restart quickly its production program and build many, many more weapons.... Now, let's imagine the future. What if he fails to comply and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route, which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made? Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you he'll use the arsenal.... President Clinton ~ 1998
Click to expand...

/derail

Sorry
 
I'm pretty sure that everyone who was paying attention in 2000 from about March through November knew that Bush was going to do something about Iraq if he got elected.
 
I am not a big fan of the CBC, as I find they tend to under research and over play various things, including Conspiracy Theories (see a 2006 special they did featuring Dylan Avery).

Now it looks like they are gonna do it again...I hope I am wrong.

http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/index.html

"The Unofficial Story: Eight Years After 9/11 why are doubts...."

Will be for an "Interesting" watch this Friday Night.

If you get CBC in the USA, you might be able to watch it.

This Friday Night, Nov 27th, at 8PM Eastern

TAM:)
 
Last edited:
Interesting, when you click on the 16 second advert for the doc on the link I gave, it brings you to a facebook page, where a guy has already posted...lol

Mark Young
From Richard Gage AIA:
We recorded an agreement with Oleh Rumak, executive producer, that we would grant an interview only under the condition that they would air the evidence of free-fall, molten metal, iron-rich microspheres, nano-thermite chips, lateral ejections, and pulverized concrete.

Just a reminder in case you decide to leave this stuff out.
Click to expand...

Too funny.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Interesting, when you click on the 16 second advert for the doc on the link I gave, it brings you to a facebook page, where a guy has already posted...lol



Too funny.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Yes, the full text of that is at Gage's site:

http://www.ae911truth.org/info/112

They are whingeing that they trusted National Geographic and got burned, but they are trusting CBC. "Will the CBC honor its promise?"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom