And the hits keep on coming.
No effect on Unit Cohesion? But Bill Thompson once saw a guy in a shower!
No effect on Unit Cohesion? But Bill Thompson once saw a guy in a shower!
In all fairness he did. It is because it is still socially acceptable to be homophobic in America, but it is not socially acceptable to be racist.
It is not a good answer, and not one I would consider a valid argument for keeping DADT, but he did answer it.
You don't seem to be able to comprehend. I don't think you are homophobic because you think DADT will stick.
I think you are homophobic for the following reasons among others:
- You argue in favor DADT, using arguments that diminish the experience of being gay and being forced into the closet
- You support DADT because it 'protects' gays from all of those other homophopes, but not you
- you uncritically accept assertions that molestation and confused gender rolls in upbringing can make a child become gay
- You argue in favor of DADT because in stress situations a gay soldier cannot control his sexual urges and may rape one of his squadmates
You argue in favor of DADT because in stress situations a gay soldier cannot control his sexual urges and may rape one of his squadmates
But he hasn't answered why it was not an equally bad idea for Truman to integrate the armed forces. Interracial marriage was illegal in many states at the time that it is not associated with by most people, like California.
You have to compare racism of the late 40s to homophobia today not racism today.
It means that if a homosexual has sexual relationships that they need to be in constant fear of being discovered. Just like the straights.
The military is now demanding celibacy of all troops. That will solve the problem of what to do with children durring the deployment of their mother. Dishonnerable discharges for all mothers.
I said that there are no religions in the United States that preach that blacks should be killed like they preach that homosexuals should be killed and doing so would please God.
It was one of your worst arguments here.
The amount of churches that preach that gays should be murdered is very, very small. Why should United States military policy be dictated by what a hundred or so nuts think?
You don't know what DADT is about.
You think it is an "ant-gay" policy.
Or that it takes rights away from Gay people.
Several posts have gone into what it is and why it came about. Does reading make your head hurt or something?
What are you disagreeing with?Your point is that gay people should not have the same rights in the military as straight people. This will put a lot of gay people off joining the military. You are, therefore, arguing that gay people shouldn't serve in the military by agreeing with a practice that will discriminate against them. Your reasoning for this is that "the United States is a powder keg of Religious Extremism." So you are saying that we should discriminate against gay people so that religious extremists will be more comfortable. Again, why is that?
Also, althought they do not preach murder, The Mormons believe that they can "cure" homosexuality and so do the Scientologists. Both are larger than you might think.
your response:cwalner said:I think you are homophobic for the following reasons among others:
You argue in favor DADT, using arguments that diminish the experience of being gay and being forced into the closet
<snip>
Bill Thompson said:Oh the trauma of being forced in the closet!! If you cannot handle that heat, stay out of the kitchen.
You are a liar. It means that the military is not allowed to ask a servicemen of their sexual orientation and an individual has the right not to tell.
So under DADT, it is a right of gay service members to live in the closet, not an obligation? Then explain why soldiers have been dishonorobly discharged for choosing not to exercise this right so generously granted them by DADT?
ETA: According to Bill, geing gay in the military is just like being charged of a crime. You have the right to remain silent, but anything you say can and will be used against you.
Look into the policies and practices regarding homosexuality among the following formidable groups in the USA and imagine how they would take to having their fellow servicemen openly discuss their sexual orientation. And then tell me if it is out of line for Generals and Admirals to merely tell their service men to keep their sexual orientation private:
The Mormons
The Evangelists
The Southern Baptists
The Scientologist
The Biblical Fundamentalists
You might think, "what better way to force social change than to remove DADT policy! What could possibly go wrong?" Taking such risks is not what the military does.
I now believe that if gay men and lesbians served openly in the United States military, they would not undermine the efficacy of the armed forces. Our military has been stretched thin by our deployments in the Middle East, and we must welcome the service of any American who is willing and able to do the job.
What the hell are you talking about? The only rights servicemen and servicewomen have in the military are the ones that the military gives them.
Yeah, I addressed that.
I said that there are no religions in the United States that preach that blacks should be killed like they preach that homosexuals should be killed and doing so would please God.