• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

...Richard Gage destroyed by Kim Hill

Pardalis said:
Speaking of money, where do they get the budget to do those trips? Who exactly funds them?
Click to expand...

The money comes from incredibly stupid people, who buy incredibly stupid crap, from an incredibly stupid bunch of people.

Then, all that money goes to a NPO called the Agape Foundation, then gets funneled back to them. AE911Liars aren't even a 501(c)(3) on their own, as they would have to show all the world how much Gage and his merry bunch of liars make.
 
ROFL! I love how he won't touch evolution with a 10 ft pole. Just like every other twoofer when his nuttery is shown to be equivalent to other forms of kookery he runs away. The parallels of 9/11 twoof and intelligent design are astounding.

Holes in the official story = Gaps in the fossil record.

The mainstream media is suppressing the truth = the scientific community is suppressing the truth.

Lots of scientists believe it was an inside job = Lots of scientists don't believe in evolution

Only explosives could have made the buildings fall like that = Only God can make life.
 
Algebra34 said:
I think a lot of what Gage said was on target. It just wasn't getting through all the comedy. It reminded me of the old Howard Stern show. All he could do was get his plugs in at that point. Debunkers don't debunk. They just get belligerent about a topic they know nothing about for the most part. It speaks volumes. Might as well plug the appearance and CD as the debunker continues to rant incoherently. It's all good in the end.
Click to expand...

Really? So are you claiming to know more about 9/11 than say maybe Gravy, or Parky or Justin, or maybe BigAl, or myself?? Is that what you are implying? If so, you're sadly mistaken.
 
Algebra34 said:
Are two different major news organizations across the world informed from the same source, or do they coincidentally make the same mistake on the same topic? Which is the debunker stance?
Click to expand...

Many times my local paper will pick up a story off of AP or some other major news outlet. It doesn't mean that they are connected, just that news companies share information. BBC most likely got a tip/feed from CNN, and went from there.

Does it prove a conspiracy? **** no.

Now, please answer the other questions that have been posed to you, or quit spamming the forum.
 
bill smith said:
Disinformation Parky, don't you recognise it when you see it ? There is plenty and plenty more. Remember .....too much information is more effective than too little from the perps point of view. It's a dead giveaway.
Click to expand...

Though I seriously shouldn't be, I can't believe that you Truthers haven't learned anything in 8 YEARS!

If you were investigating a murder and all the witnesses told exactly identical stories of what happened, you'd let them go because your understanding of eyewittness testimony and human memory is non-existant. In the real world we expect to get 12 different stories from 10 witnesses because no two people see the same thing the same way. If everyone is telling the exact same story, then that's a sign they have collaborated to make it up, but you lot have it totally around the wrong way. Still what's different about that?
 
R.Mackey said:
If people have nothing to say, you don't have to respond to them. It rather moots the purpose of the Ignore feature. Thank you.
Click to expand...

But CE says nothing so much better (and more often) than our other members that it's just hard to resist giving him a score on his efforts.
 
bill smith said:
What about the report that said it had collapsed at 10:45 am ? Is that possible ?
Click to expand...


Sure, as IIRC, there was still TONS of smoke and dust in the air, and WTC 7 might not have been visible, or was mistaken, as you know, people sometimes do.
 
Algebra34 said:
Well, for instance, why all the criticism against the different versions of Loose Change? As if they had all the information on 9/11 when it first came out. What's good enough for the twoofer isn't good enough for the debunker apparently.
Click to expand...

I won't speak for everyone, but the BIGGEST problem that I personally have with Loose Change, is that a simple Google search would have ruled out 90% of the movie as false, and yet still was produced.

Then the second one came out, with the same incorrect claims, just with a few more. Too bad the additions were wrong also. Some being blatent lies.

Then the Third came out, which was about the same as the first two, just this time with different lies, and some being the same as the previous ones.

Taken out of context, misquoting, and taking similies out of context, quotemining, and being just an ass is my issues with LC.

Dylan saw dollar signs, and ran with it.l He is a liar, and a scumbag. I have has the (dis)pleasure of speaking with him once, and I wanted to slap him for being stupid.
 
ElMondoHummus said:
I state two in my post and you still have to ask? For one, the role, or rather the lack thereof, of diesel fuel in the fires. And two, the special role the long truss spans held in the failures.

I'm sure others can elaborate on this, but those are two I'm aware of.
Click to expand...


The Towers' damage being a major contributor to the collapse.
 
Algebra34 said:
Who thinks about 9/11 to this day except people like you and me?
Click to expand...

I live in a community in which fresh "Remember .... died 9/11/2001" signs show up in the windows of new cars to this day.

There has never been the slightest evidence of any "Truth Movement" activity here.
 
Last edited:
This thread has me in stitches. WAIT - I totally did not plan that pun.

It would seem there is a serious lack of knowledge regarding the way news gathering and reporting organizations operate at the local, national, and international level.

But let's not let that little detail stop us from putting out information that supports the conclusion we know to be true.

After all, the ability to pierce the veil so many blissfully leave on is so much stronger than any "authoritative" piece of evidence. "Authoritative" can be discarded out of hand, since it's obviously being manipulated.

Therefore, we can only accept research from people whose honesty and like-mindedness we can trust.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom