Deeper than primes

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Man said:
Ignoring that a line is just a single point in that orthogonal dimension...
Click to expand...

Orthogonal to what?

Aga you demostrate your inability to get a one and only one dimesion.
 
jsfisher said:
That is not a substantive response to my post.

Do you still maintain that a line can be a circle, or do you wish to retract that claim, now?
Click to expand...

Yes, a circle is some form of a closed line.

Now please answer to my question, which is:

What is the difference between an endless open line (where only a 1-dim is considered) and an open line segment?
 
doronshadmi said:
Yes, a circle is some form of a closed line.
Click to expand...

Great. I will at the to the list of other absurd things you have said over time. For future reference, Doron, no, circles are not lines.

Now please answer to my question, which is:

What is the difference between an endless open line (where only a 1-dim is considered) and an open line segment?
Click to expand...

You have stated, with crystal clarity, that you have no idea what a line is. You take words that you don't comprehend, you conjoin them with other words to make nonsensical phrases, and you expect the final conglomeration to be a clear question?
 
doronshadmi said:
Orthogonal to what?
Click to expand...

The line, I'll bold it in case you missed it.

The Man said:
Ignoring that a line is just a single point in that orthogonal dimension and that being one dimensional means that it only takes a single value to define any location (single point) on that line. Without a “single point along it” your “edgeless (or endless) open line” has no dimension as you can define no locations on something that does not have any location along it.
Click to expand...


doronshadmi said:
Aga you demostrate your inability to get a one and only one dimesion.
Click to expand...

Again you simply demonstrate your ignorance of what defines a line as one dimensional.
 
jsfisher said:
Great. I will at the to the list of other absurd things you have said over time. For future reference, Doron, no, circles are not lines.
Click to expand...

Thay can be considered as what is called Geodesic lines http://eom.springer.de/G/g044120.htm


Now for the last time, please answer to the question:

What is the difference between an endless open line (where only a 1-dim is considered) and an open line segment?
 
doronshadmi said:
Thay can be considered as what is called Geodesic lines http://eom.springer.de/G/g044120.htm
Click to expand...

No, they can't. Those would be geodesic lines, not lines.

Still, though, you have stumbled into an area that may help you see your folly. Doubtful, but worth a shot.

Consider the term, knot (and I mean the common usage, not the mathematical one). The term has meaning. Some things are knots, and many things are not. I can qualify the term to be more specific, as in square knot. I can also qualify the term to become something else. Slip knot, for example, is not a knot.

The term, line, means something in Mathematics. Geodesic line means something, too, but it is separate from the meaning of the unqualified term, line.

Every one in this thread except you seems to understand what the term, line, means. Still, you insist on qualifying the term to construct gibberish.

Give it up, or explain how endless open line differs from the base term.
 
jsfisher,

Let's make according to your conditions:


What is the difference between a single endless line (where only a 1-dim is considered) and a single line segment?
 
doronshadmi said:
In order to do it you are using also 2-D space.


Again you demostrate your inability to get a one and only one dimesion.
Click to expand...


No, he hasn't, but be that as it may, lines (all one of them) are exceedingly uninteresting in 1-dimensional space.
 
Come on guys, doron is so far gone, we'll never be able to reach him. Just let him be in his little world of contradictions and lunacy. Let's not feed the ego.
 
doronshadmi said:
jsfisher,

Let's make according to your conditions:


What is the difference between a single endless line (where only a 1-dim is considered) and a single line segment?
Click to expand...

Replacing "open" (or "(open)") with the word "single" isn't anything according to my conditions.
 
jsfisher said:
Replacing "open" (or "(open)") with the word "single" isn't anything according to my conditions.
Click to expand...

The "single" is here to avoid The Man's orthogonal gibberish.

Now please answer to the question:

What is the difference between a single endless line (where only a 1-dim is considered) and a single line segment?
 
doronshadmi said:
The "single" is here to avoid The Man's orthogonal gibberish.
Click to expand...

So, when you said you were making it according to my conditions were you lying again or misunderstanding your own posts again?

Be that as it may, so far you haven't addressed the issues I've put to you regarding your word-salad questions.
 
jsfisher said:
So, when you said you were making it according to my conditions were you lying again or misunderstanding your own posts again?

Be that as it may, so far you haven't addressed the issues I've put to you regarding your word-salad questions.
Click to expand...

For the last time:

What is the difference between a single endless line (where only a 1-dim is considered) and a single line segment?

If you are not going to answer now, then I can clearly conclude that you are unable to get it.

In that case, bye.
 
doronshadmi said:
For the last time:
Click to expand...

You have never been a man of your word before, but I'm hopeful this time.

...<same old, same old>...

If you are not going to answer now, then I can clearly conclude that you are unable to get it.
Click to expand...

Knock yourself concluding whatever you like. Bear in mind, though, your track record for reaching logical conclusions isn't all that good.

In that case, bye.
Click to expand...

You aren't raising my hopes falsely, are you?
 
doronshadmi said:
In order to do it you are using also 2-D space.
Click to expand...

To do what Doron, bold the word line? Could you be any less specific Doron? Oh wait that’s right being specific would be completely contrary to your notions. Your deliberate ignorance limits only you Doron not anyone else.

To extrapolate on what jsfisher just posted considering only one dimension does not dictate that dimension must be the one of the lines extents, in such a single dimension your line is just a point.

doronshadmi said:
Again you demostrate your inability to get a one and only one dimesion.
Click to expand...

Again you demonstrate your ignorance of what makes both a line and a circle one dimensional.
 
The Man said:
To do what Doron, bold the word line? Could you be any less specific Doron? Oh wait that’s right being specific would be completely contrary to your notions. Your deliberate ignorance limits only you Doron not anyone else.

To extrapolate on what jsfisher just posted considering only one dimension does not dictate that dimension must be the one of the lines extents, in such a single dimension your line is just a point.



Again you demonstrate your ignorance of what makes both a line and a circle one dimensional.
Click to expand...


You have missed this:

For the last time:

What is the difference between a single endless line (where only a 1-dim is considered) and a single line segment?


jsfisher has failed to get it.



Any way you helped me a lot to improve my paper http://www.scribd.com/doc/21967511/TOC-NEW2
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom