• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Last edited:
The fact you said never destroys your point. And my post 6478 goes deeper into the point I was making.
What point? Nobody sees any point.
This is a just another example of how many times the main priority is to try to make me look bad in some way rather than the issue in question.
Uh DOC, nobody can make you look any worst than your own posts history.
 
Originally Posted by joobz
A soul is considered a consiousness that exists beyond the physical body.
There is no evidence for a soul, human or otherwise.

I noticed you used the word considered, do you consider the soul a consciousness that exists beyond the body?

And if you do, what is your evidence?


Superb.
DOC actually went back to a post made by joobz on 8 March 2009 (page 51 of this thread) to come up with this derailment ploy.
Granted, page 51 is an interesting read, but hardly 'evidence' for why we know the NT writers told the truth.
Unless there's some sort of hidden 'code' in the post texts?
 
So the existence or non-existence of the soul has nothing to do with Jesus or New Testament in your viewpoint?
The only way that has any bearing is if you have evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth.

Now, do you have any evidence to present?
 
Superb.
DOC actually went back to a post made by joobz on 8 March 2009 (page 51 of this thread) to come up with this derailment ploy.
Granted, page 51 is an interesting read, but hardly 'evidence' for why we know the NT writers told the truth.
Unless there's some sort of hidden 'code' in the post texts?
It's exactly the same reason why his Jefferson thread was closed. Every time he is cornered and has nothing left to say, he rehashes his same old pile of garbage.

Anybody want to report this? This will undoubtedly lead to this thread FINALLY being closed.
 
It's exactly the same reason why his Jefferson thread was closed. Every time he is cornered and has nothing left to say, he rehashes his same old pile of garbage.

Anybody want to report this? This will undoubtedly lead to this thread FINALLY being closed.

Why does talking about the soul bother you so much and I you didn't answer my question if the existence or non-existence of the soul has anything to do with Jesus or the New Testament?

And I'm not cornered, what am I cornered with? You're the one who is acting like he is cornered to use your language because you want this thread to go away.
 
Last edited:
So then if your brain says slavery is evil like you have many times that is strictly because of chemical reactions in your brain. All someone would have to do is change the chemistry in your brain somehow and then it would be possible to make slavery no longer evil.

Fascinating.
After repeated protests that discussion of slavery should be in a separate thread, DOC reaches back over a 100 pages, not posts, to come up with an excuse for this sort of sermon-speak.
I can't call it much else; by this sort of reasoning, changing DOC's brain's chemistry would change his belief in the inerrancy of the bible.
 
Why does talking about the soul bother you so much and I you didn't answer my question if the existence or non-existence of the soul has anything to do with Jesus or the New Testament?
I'm sorry, did you have any evidence to present? No? So it is a thread derail.
And I'm not cornered, what am I cornered with? You're the one who is acting like he is cornered to use your language because you want this thread to go away.
Stop projecting your dishonesty, it is disgusting. Keep it to yourself. Yucks.
So any evidence? Still waiting.

Killing this thread is like killing a lab mouse. You know its for the greater good but you still feel bad when you break its neck.
 
Superb.
DOC actually went back to a post made by joobz on 8 March 2009 (page 51 of this thread) to come up with this derailment ploy.
Granted, page 51 is an interesting read, but hardly 'evidence' for why we know the NT writers told the truth.


So the existence or non-existence of the soul that Jesus talks about is not an important factor in the NT?
 
Fascinating.
After repeated protests that discussion of slavery should be in a separate thread, DOC reaches back over a 100 pages, not posts, to come up with an excuse for this sort of sermon-speak.
I can't call it much else; by this sort of reasoning, changing DOC's brain's chemistry would change his belief in the inerrancy of the bible.
Desperation leads to panic. It's like watching someone panic and drown as a riptide drags them to their doom.
 
I'm sorry, did you have any evidence to present? No? So it is a thread derail.
You're phony to say talking about the existence or non existence of the soul in a New Testament thread is a derail

Jesus and Paul talked a lot about the soul in the NT.

If you can prove the soul doesn't exist, like some in here implied then that would be extremely important to your arguments.
 
Last edited:
That pesky word 'evidence' seems to have escaped your notice again, DOC.

If you have evidence to present about the existence of "souls", then such evidence will fit right in to this thread.

If you have no evidence, then the discussion of souls is indeed a derail. The title of the thread, in case you have forgotten, is "Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth". 163 pages and no evidence for truth has yet been presented, though I concede lots of evidence has been demonstrated for belief.

Belief, as I am sure you know, is not a synonym for either truth or knowledge.
 
Originally Posted by Marduk
If anyone needed proof that Doc never reads beyond the first line of a post
there it is

The fact you said never destroys your point. And my post 6478

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5219641#post5219641

goes deeper into the point I was making.

This is a just another example of how many times the main priority is to try to make me look bad in some way rather than the issue in question.

DOC, I really can't agree with you there.
Perhaps I'm the only one to find it well, peculiar, that you've dedicated time to dredge up a post from over a 100 pages back to to inspire this tangent.
The main priority here isn't to make you look bad, it's to discuss evidence of the truth of the NT writers.

You want to discuss the existence of the soul?
Feel free, please, if you think it an interesting subject.
But not on a thread dedicated to the evidence for the truth of the NT writers, as it looks more like thread de-railment rather than a serious discussion.
 
You want to discuss the existence of the soul?
Feel free, please, if you think it an interesting subject.
But not on a thread dedicated to the evidence for the truth of the NT writers, as it looks more like thread de-railment rather than a serious discussion.

If I could give evidence of the existence of the soul would that be evidence that increases the likelihood that the NT writers were telling the truth?
 
Why does talking about the soul bother you so much and I you didn't answer my question if the existence or non-existence of the soul has anything to do with Jesus or the New Testament?

And I'm not cornered, what am I cornered with? You're the one who is acting like he is cornered to use your language because you want this thread to go away.

Well, that's an interesting example of DOC's point of view.
Unfortunately DOC, whatever hapens tothis thread, it will not go away, as you put it.
It will remain in the archives as a mute witness to your achievements here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom