• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Orly Taitz's Obama birther lawsuit laughed out of court

"The letter also complains that the initial filing for a temporary restraining order earlier this month, which objected to serving under Barack Obama because he is (allegedly) not legitimately president, was "full of political conjecture, which was not my interest. I had no intention of refusing orders nor will I. I simply wanted to verify the lawfulness of my orders.""

Wow! That is some speedy backpedaling.

Rhodes should be ashamed of herself.
 
"The letter also complains that the initial filing for a temporary restraining order earlier this month, which objected to serving under Barack Obama because he is (allegedly) not legitimately president, was "full of political conjecture, which was not my interest. I had no intention of refusing orders nor will I. I simply wanted to verify the lawfulness of my orders.""

Wow! That is some speedy backpedaling.

Rhodes should be ashamed of herself.

Don't hold your breath...shame got nothing to do with it.
 
I would imagine her CO verified the lawfulness of her orders REAL quick.
 
"The letter also complains that the initial filing for a temporary restraining order earlier this month, which objected to serving under Barack Obama because he is (allegedly) not legitimately president, was "full of political conjecture, which was not my interest. I had no intention of refusing orders nor will I. I simply wanted to verify the lawfulness of my orders.""

Wow! That is some speedy backpedaling.

Rhodes should be ashamed of herself.

Wow. Someone had an officer call them into their office. That sounds like a nice, thorough chewing out was had off the record.
 
Here's another twist. Orly now claims that her client's letter (which diavowed Orly) maybe forged, Orly wrote:

Orly Taitz said:
I don't know if this letter came from her, since she is in Iraq now and the Office -max store from where it came, states that they don't send faxes for customers. The signature on her notarized letter from Kansas and this letter looks different.
...

Full: Source


If anyone cares, Judge Clay D. Land is a Bush appointee.
 
Last edited:
OK, I dont like being deployed any more than anyone else but she isnt the first person to try and duck a deployment and wont be the last. I can at least understand her motivation- she didnt want to come here.

<Off Topic>

Thank you for serving. :)

</Off Topic>

And good on Dr. Rhodes for sucking it up and shipping out. I hope she comes home safely when her tour ends.
 
Oooh, Orly is acting without informing or gaining the consent of her client?

Now she's really going to get in trouble. The judge - to say nothing of the state bar and the ABA - is not going to look kindly on this.

Oh boy, Oily Taintz gonna' get herself in trooooouuuuuuble! How does this sort of stuff get legs? I mean, what sort of chemicals are these people huffing? Probably the same one that help them to believe in a magic, cloud-riding wizard? God, these people are idiots. :boggled:
 
When a judge quotes Yogi Berra in the first sentence of an opinion, someone is about to be taken to the woodshed.


Indeed! And it appears that Ms. Taitz is going out of her way to land herself in a bigger pile of doo doo every time she opens her mouth.


I created a webpage for this piece of Legaltainment™ at which I have gathered up all of the documents filed in the Rhodes case, for those who are interested in reading the ones that have not been posted here.

The page is located here.

Enjoy!
 
Indeed! And it appears that Ms. Taitz is going out of her way to land herself in a bigger pile of doo doo every time she opens her mouth.


I created a webpage for this piece of Legaltainment™ at which I have gathered up all of the documents filed in the Rhodes case, for those who are interested in reading the ones that have not been posted here.

The page is located here.

Enjoy!


So, out of curiosity, does the 14-day deadline on the "order to show cause" include weekends/holidays or not? I.e. can we expect the smackdown to come on 2 October or will it be later?
 
So, out of curiosity, does the 14-day deadline on the "order to show cause" include weekends/holidays or not? I.e. can we expect the smackdown to come on 2 October or will it be later?


If I recall correctly from when this came up in the George Corndog Simpson litigation, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure say that you don't count the day of the event, and you don't count weekends or holidays if the time period allotted is 11 days or fewer, but that if the time period is more than 11 days, then you simply count the number of days without regard to weekends or holidays (ETA: unless the last day falls on a weekend or holiday).

I'll look it up, but that is my recollection off the top of my head, and if that is correct, then October 2 is the deadline for Ms. Taitz to file whatever she plans to file in order to show cause why she should not be required to pay the $10,000 in sanctions.

ETA: The above appears to be correct per Rule 6 on computing time.
 
Last edited:
Here's some other things Taitz believes:

What Orly Taitz believes
The head Birther talks about Obama's boyfriends, the long arm of Hugo Chavez and how the Web is rigged against her
By Gabriel Winant
Editor's note: Listen to an hour of Salon's interview with Orly Taitz here.
Aug. 13, 2009
Salon.com
...
It's Barry Soetoro, not Barack Obama. In Taitz's telling, he went to school in Indonesia not as Barack Obama, but as Barry Soetoro. Through his father, he holds Kenyan and British citizenship, and through his stepfather, he has an Indonesian passport.
...
FactCheck.org is not to be trusted. FactCheck.org, the debunking site that verified Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate and labeled the Birther conspiracy bunk, is unreliable, says Taitz.

"Oh, oh, oh. Oh, let me tell you about FactCheck. FactCheck does not have one single forensic document expert. They have no expert. So what I have provided has more value than what they have provided. Not only that, did you know that FactCheck.org is an offshoot of Annenberg Foundation, as well as Annenberg Challenge." Which brings us to:

The Annenberg Challenge program for Chicago schools, for which Obama sat on the board, saw hundreds of millions of dollars mysteriously frittered away. Here, I admit I paused to wonder whether the Annenbergs might not be mad at Obama over the fraud at the Annenberg Challenge, and thus unlikely to cover up for his Kenyan-ness by pulling strings at FactCheck.org. But I said nothing to Taitz.
...
Google is in on all of this. Taitz hedges and hints as with the gay murders, but she seems to entertain the possibility that Google, or possibly the entire Internet, is part of the plot to cover up Obama's illegitimacy. She muses darkly on the hacking of her PayPal account and the disappearance of her Wikipedia page, as well as hundreds of thousands of lost results for the search "Orly Taitz." She wants to know how else to explain why Google flagged her Web site as a "Reported Attack Site!"

Hundreds of servicemen are getting sick from mysterious vaccinations. Taitz wants some answers on why members of the military are required to receive certain vaccinations. "Did you know that there are hundreds of servicemen, that were vaccinated, and have reported serious, severe side effects of vaccination?" I ask her why there are mandatory vaccinations. "I don't know, and we can ask the Department of Defense. There is no reason provided!" Maybe soldiers going into combat may need certain kinds of immunity?
...
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez may have been rigging our elections. He can do this because he owns Sequoia Voting Systems? Did I know this? No. Neither did Google, since searching the Internet seems to indicate it's actually just a group of Venezuelans who own Sequoia, a fact I point out to Taitz.
...

Full: Salon.com
 
If I recall correctly from when this came up in the George Corndog Simpson litigation, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure say that you don't count the day of the event, and you don't count weekends or holidays if the time period allotted is 11 days or fewer, but that if the time period is more than 11 days, then you simply count the number of days without regard to weekends or holidays (ETA: unless the last day falls on a weekend or holiday).


So a 14 day deadline is shorter than an 11 day deadline?
 
Last edited:
Indeed! And it appears that Ms. Taitz is going out of her way to land herself in a bigger pile of doo doo every time she opens her mouth.


I created a webpage for this piece of Legaltainment™ at which I have gathered up all of the documents filed in the Rhodes case, for those who are interested in reading the ones that have not been posted here.

The page is located here.

Enjoy!

Thank you for the the legaltainment... or should I say the failtainment? Anyway.

I liked this, from the complaint:

Rather the vast preponderance of the credible evidence, all of the clear and convincing evidence, and some facts indicate beyond reasonable doubt that the President is an alien

That's right, she doesn't just have the vast preponderance of the credible evidence, which would be impressive... not just all of the clear and convincing evidence, which would be amazing... but... some facts!
 
"The letter also complains that the initial filing for a temporary restraining order earlier this month, which objected to serving under Barack Obama because he is (allegedly) not legitimately president, was "full of political conjecture, which was not my interest. I had no intention of refusing orders nor will I. I simply wanted to verify the lawfulness of my orders.""

Wow! That is some speedy backpedaling.

Rhodes should be ashamed of herself.


So Rhodes had no idea that Orly was a deranged racist (and a lousy lawyer) before initially retaining her? Come on.
 
From complaint:

28. This Court should intervene now to grant both temporary and permanent
injunctive relief and declaratory judgment because the United States Code and
Army afford her no relief, aside from reliance upon her oath, which she now
asserts---to defend her against the monstrosity of being compelled to wage war
under an illegal dictator compared by many and actually comparable to Adolph
Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung, Idi Amin, and Francois and Jean-Claude
Duvalier,
especially when this leader has repeatedly expressed his admiration for
Fidel Castro Ruz and other communist leaders.

I love that wording, "compared by many and actually comparable". :)
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom