SweatyYeti
Master Poster
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2006
- Messages
- 2,919
Football shoulder pads don't add width to a player's chest....
It's obvious you don't know what you're talking about.
Go suck on a lollipop, and then get back to us.
The PG Film - Bob Heironimus and Patty
- Thread starter SweatyYeti
- Start date
- Status
Football shoulder pads don't add width to a player's chest....
It's obvious you don't know what you're talking about.
Go suck on a lollipop, and then get back to us.
kitakaze
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
How nice, a "later". People around here all know about you and your laters. But, dear old Sweaty, I did give you some measurements to look at. It was very kind of Astro to help you out like that, don't you think? Not much inhuman anything in those numbers. Oops for you.
No comment about Patty's morphing
head noted. Maybe uber-lucky Patterson got something far more special than he realized. How come what would be the actual luck Patterson had as shown by Patterson's artistic and literary ventures just prior to his film completely annihilates any subjective, imaginary luck that you try and assign him? Oops for you.kitakaze
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
Oops for you.
It's obvious you don't know what you're talking about.
Go suck on a lollipop, and then get back to us.
Enjoy.
kitakaze
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
Not yet....but I will.For joy, images. Yay. I love images. Have any reliable measurements? Numbers? Like, Patty's shoulders are X cm's wide and thus X % out of human range. No?
Here you go, a rain of pain. BTW, I have images, too. Here's one just for you...
I've given it to you before, but you like to forget. Trauma can do that.
Eventually, I'll have an actual re-construction of Patty's distinctively styled, and massive upper-body, also.
Note in Sweaty's response how he tellingly ignored both the picture and the links to measurements I provided him. The picture, using Sweaty's own favoured method, shows Jim McLarin to have an arm length comparable to Patty's...
One can see there that Patty isn't inhumanly proportioned at all. This is what Sweaty does. He runs from, flees from, ignores, evades, and dodges the basic problems he can not contend with. This is where the words "intellectual dishonesty" and "fanatical behaviour" come in. Patty has a morphing head? That's a problem. I think that bodes ill for reliable head measurements. Sweaty? No problem, just *plonk*...
...Problem solved.
Patty's arms shown not to be inhumanly long at all using the Sweaty crayon method?
*plonk*
Problem solved.
SweatyYeti
Master Poster
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2006
- Messages
- 2,919
Originally Posted by SweatyYeti
Football shoulder pads don't add width to a player's chest....
Oops for you.
More kitty-poo to clean up. Every post....a guaranteed pile.
Those shoulder pads are only adding very little...(practically no)...width across the front of the player's chest.....and not adding any width along the side of his chest.
Again.....the suit images posted by a "skeptic" have no relevance to the aspect of Patty's torso/chest width that I have been talking about.
Last edited:
SweatyYeti
Master Poster
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2006
- Messages
- 2,919
kitakaze wrote:
Again....more clean-up.
Just one quick example of Patty's extreme body dimensions, for now...
Plenty more......later.
Again....more clean-up.
Just one quick example of Patty's extreme body dimensions, for now...
Plenty more......later.
Astrophotographer
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 1,843
GIGO. Measurements...Measurements...Measurements... You are using an out of focus/blurry/improperly scaled (Bob 175 pixels tall to the top of his hat and Bunny 178 pixels)/low resolution image. Therefore, it is an invalid image comparison. This is why measurements are so important.
I keep trying to make you provide us with some numbers/measurements but you keep refusing to do so. Is there a reason for this? Is it because you don't know how? Perhaps it is because you do know how but are too lazy or intend to pull a fast one on everyone. Inquiring minds want to know.
Astrophotographer
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 1,843
Present measurements of Bunny's actual chest width on front and side.
captain koolaid
Muse
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2008
- Messages
- 538
I don't see Patty McPadding's arms "hanging straight" at all. In the side-on and 3/4 shots, it's hard to tell. If you assume that the shoulder/arm socket is where it looks like it is located, then maybe. But, that socket isn't necessarily where bone is, when factoring in something like shoulder pads, and the view of the subject in that shot. In the rear-view shot you have presented, Patty's arms look pretty "angled out" to me. Not that different compared to the portly fellow on the fire hydrant. His arms look somewhat more inclined, but not by enough to make the point you are arguing. Patty McPadding's arms do not appear to be literally "hanging straight down". But, that's just an opinion on the blurry mess that is Roger Patterson's Z-grade, drive-in movie, creature feature.
Not 7'4", then? Billzskillz = FAIL?
Last edited:
kitakaze
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
More kitty-poo to clean up. Every post....a guaranteed pile.
Those shoulder pads are only adding very little...(practically no)...width across the front of the player's chest.....and not adding any width along the side of his chest.
You lie. You said "Football shoulder pads don't add width to a player's chest." Any child can see that the pads I posted are adding at least several inches to the player's chest. Thus, what you said was simply false. You are not an intellectually honest person, so you can not admit the falseness of your claim. Further more, you are impotent to show measurements showing that Patty's torso can not be a suit. Thus, you simply post the same meaningless comparison to no effect.
If you want to classify a picture that clearly refutes a simply stupid claim of your as "poo" with meaningless fluff, be my guest. If you want to actually do some real science and analysis, you can tell us something the ends with dimensional measurements of the subject you are looking at. Something with inches/cm's at the end. You are unable to do this so you simply dance and blather more "laters".
Quack, quack. Prove it, don't just blow smoke up people's behinds.
Again....more clean-up.
[qimg]http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w28/SweatyYeti/Patty%20and%20Bob%20Two/BobFV5.jpg[/qimg][qimg]http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w28/SweatyYeti/Patty%20and%20Bob%20Two/PattyRV5.jpg[/qimg]
Hey, look. Fanatical believer desperation. Just post it again and pray somebody doesn't see the garbage. Not happening, sorry.
*yawn*Plenty more......later.
FAIL. Next.
kitakaze
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
Fright night for Sweaty...
Fear is the mind killer.
Fear is the mind killer.
SweatyYeti
Master Poster
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2006
- Messages
- 2,919
captain koolaid wrote:
In the first part of the film, Patty barely swings her arms at all. They just hang at her sides...
If you watch the first part of the film, you'll see how her arms are doing nothing much, except for hanging straight down, at her sides.
Here's another rear-view image...
Her arms aren't 'angled-out'....despite the fact that her upper-torso/chest width is several inches wider than Bob's.
Roger............was good!
Really? They do to me!
In the first part of the film, Patty barely swings her arms at all. They just hang at her sides...
If you watch the first part of the film, you'll see how her arms are doing nothing much, except for hanging straight down, at her sides.
Here's another rear-view image...
Her arms aren't 'angled-out'....despite the fact that her upper-torso/chest width is several inches wider than Bob's.
Roger............was good!
Really? They do to me!
SweatyYeti
Master Poster
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2006
- Messages
- 2,919
Howdy, Mak!
That's what I'm thinking.....that Patty's arms are heavy, like the rest of her.......lots of muscle, and little fat.
kitakaze
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
Why not? You don't have any reliable, objective measurements of Patty's "inhuman" proportions, so, you know, whatever. Keep running.
1) No measurements.
2) Patty's morphing head.
3) Jim McLarin/Patty height and arms.
LTC8K6
Penultimate Amazing
It's a movie...
I am aware of that. As i was saying, for all we know, Mclarin may have been walking on a higher surfact than patty. Remember, the Mclarin demonstration did not occur directly after the film was shot, so the landscape would have changed
Vortigern99
Sorcerer Supreme
Distance in this case is not significant, since we're talking about proportion: the length of the arms relative to the height of the body. As anyone with eyes can see, McClarin's arms are proportionately equivalent to Patty's arms; i.e. they hang down just as far -- whether the subjects in each case are two feet from the camera, or two hundred.
- Status