Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

RedIbis, not 10 minutes ago I mentioned you as one of the saner voices in the movement. A truther who didn't support the idea that "everybody is in on it". Maybe I should make an edit?
What ever gave you that idea? RedIbis thinks that everyone who responded to the Pentagon crash site is in on it, as well as all those who were involved in the chain of custody of the Flight 77 passenger and crew remains as well as those who identified those remains by using DNA.
 
So I'm downloading the NG special. Listening to Gage and his gang is like listening to a psychopathic killer talk about his victims. These guys are creepy. If they could believe what they're saying, they can believe anything. It's undetectable. It's secret. Everyone except me is too scared.

A while back I asked about the purpose of a forum like this. These guys are dangerous. They're capable of believing anything for whatever purpose they have. God only knows what they could really do to other people or what they would do if they ran out of options.
 
Why would Red need to respond to this cartoon? Is this your pwoof?

It's a diagram of the passengers' DNA evidence found at the Pentagon. How did it get there, and in that disposition?

Here's a more official diagram:

barbdna_lge.jpg

In blue the passengers, in yellow Pentagon personnel, in dark probably include the highjakers.
 
Last edited:
Why would Red need to respond to this cartoon? Is this your pwoof?


Here's some proof for you twoofer

http://web.archive.org/web/20070704182456/http://gilroydispatch.com/news/contentview.asp?c=73724

Rescue crews were able to pull Calley's body from Flight 77's wreckage. Now, after a long period of hesitation, Jensen plans to let the Pacific waters take her cremated remains.
http://onlineathens.com/stories/091104/new_20040911030.shtml

[FONT=verdana,georgia,helvetica,arial]During an interview earlier this week, Koch delicately handled eerie mementos of the crash found during cleanup: Whittington's battered driver's license. One granddaughters' luggage tag.[/FONT]

http://web.archive.org/web/20060907034559/http://ndms.chepinc.org/data/files/3/266.pdf
 
Last edited:
Why would Red need to respond to this cartoon? Is this your pwoof?

Cartoon? Jesus, you jackass, that is a diagram of the passengers' and victims' remains.

I see we have one of those twoofers who don't give a damn about the victims or their families.

And truthers wonder why so many people hate them.
 
Cartoon? Jesus, you jackass, that is a diagram of the passengers' and victims' remains.

I see we have one of those twoofers who don't give a damn about the victims or their families.

And truthers wonder why so many people hate them.

In a way its good that these trolling twoofer *** holes keep re-registering and posting their **** over and over again. As an shining example of some of the worst scum of the truth movement,
 
In reality, 2,000 F wasn't an important temperature at all in the larger context, or even the fact that aviation fuel could burn that hot. Part of the evidence for explosive controlled demolition was that temperatures in the structures reached more than twice that temperature

lolwut? Controlled demolitions now need to be hot as well as explosive in order to work?

what corner of your ass did you pull that out of, pal?
 
9/11 Truthers are the most pathetic bunch of whiners I can think of. Really pathetic. They have little or no respect for the truth or for science. That is a fact.

That's right. All the scientists who jump on the truth bandwagon and seeks to scientifically proove the cover-up/inside job, are automatically going against everything they ever learned.

I see you have respect for Tom & Jerry cartoons going: "A cat and a mouse COULD coincidentially do that!"
 
That's right. All the scientists who jump on the truth bandwagon and seeks to scientifically proove the cover-up/inside job, are automatically going against everything they ever learned.

You should brush up on your English before swimming in the pool of ignorance that is 9/11 truth. You just said (kind of) that 9/11 truth breaks every scientific principle that scientists learn.

ETA: You're not Neils Harrit are you? If you are, you might want to save what's left of your reputation and call it quits.
 
Last edited:
That's right. All the scientists who jump on the truth bandwagon and seeks to scientifically proove the cover-up/inside job, are automatically going against everything they ever learned.

I see you have respect for Tom & Jerry cartoons going: "A cat and a mouse COULD coincidentially do that!"

Any scientist on that bandwagon has stopped being a scientist.

Not sure what the Tom & Jerry stuff is about, but there is a very long list of structural engineers (NIST, Pudue, Edinburgh etc) who don't see any need to invent strange invisible forms of explosives or Thermite to account for what happened to the WTC, but you know more than all of them put together don't you Mr Thetan?
 
AE911Twit critique of the NatGeo program. Sorry if the has already been posted

http://www.ae911truth.org/info/92

*facepalm*

Awww,

Those poor troofers just can't seem to get a break. So misunderstood, so persecuted. After all, they are only asking questions...

What a bunch of whining crybabies. They put on the blustering internet tough guy act, and proceed to immediately turn into a
bunch of blubbering schoolyard sissies the moment anyone challenges them. Their epic failures are always someone else's fault.

How pathetic.

L.
 
Last edited:
Any special on 9/11 that presents hard evidence that blows away their fantasy = hit piece. I've never seen them call it anything else.
 
Awww,

Those poor troofers just can't seem to get a break. So misunderstood, so persecuted. After all, they are only asking questions...

What a bunch of whining crybabies. They put on the blustering internet tough guy act, and proceed to immediately turn into a
bunch of blubbering schoolyard sissies the moment anyone challenges them. Their epic failures are always someone else's fault.

How pathetic.

L.
Oh boy...
the massive girders thrown 600 feet horizontally
There they go again....
 
National geographic is givin apologizes in the next new program about the distorsions about the reality in the first national geographic report , they have made mistakes and lies like were in the FEMA and The NIST reports , obviously the FEMA and NIST reports are plagued with lies because the FEMA and NIST reports have conflict interest with the reality and the truth about what really happened the 9/11 , the money in the pocket of the FEMA and NIST workers depend if they are able to destroy the evidence of controlled demolition of 9/11 , if they tell the truth the bush administration dont give anymore money to them
 
Last edited:
here comes that burning feeling again.

National geographic is givin apologizes in the next new program about the distorsions about the reality in the first national geographic report , they have made mistakes and lies like were in the FEMA and The NIST reports , obviously the FEMA and NIST reports are plagued with lies because the FEMA and NIST reports have conflict interest with the reality and the truth about what really happened the 9/11 , the money in the pocket of the FEMA and NIST workers depend if they are able to destroy the evidence of controlled demolition of 9/11 , if they tell the truth the bush administration dont give anymore money to them


oh just... never mind.
:dl:
 
National geographic is givin apologizes in the next new program about the distorsions about the reality in the first national geographic report , they have made mistakes and lies like were in the FEMA and The NIST reports , obviously the FEMA and NIST reports are plagued with lies because the FEMA and NIST reports have conflict interest with the reality and the truth about what really happened the 9/11 , the money in the pocket of the FEMA and NIST workers depend if they are able to destroy the evidence of controlled demolition of 9/11 , if they tell the truth the bush administration dont give anymore money to them

Quality post there champ, except for the whole lie in the first five words.

If you are going to be here awhile, you may wish to look up the concept of a "period." Here are a few you can use: ......

kthxbye
 

Back
Top Bottom