Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

Algebra34 said:
How thick ARE the pentagon walls?
Click to expand...

The answer depends on the particular wall or walls to which you are referring, but I have already posted a link to an engineering report that sets out in detail the construction of the building, including the various walls and the thickness of same. Go ahead, take a peek.
 
bill smith said:
It shows that the eggshell nose of a modern jetliner could never penetrate 18'' of steel reinforced concrete (6 consecutive times) or pass through a line of 14'' x 14'' x 3/8th inch braced steel box columns or effertlessly lead the 155-foot body of an airliner down through mineral soil so that even the tip of its tail was covered and it looked like no aircraft had crashed there. I include a hyperlink so that you can see the picture again to see what I mean.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5080652&postcount=499
Click to expand...

I also cannot throw a bullet and have it penetrate something. BUT, fire it from a gun, and that is a whole nother story.

Also, could it not be possible that it wasn't JUST the fuselage and maybe, I dunno, the rest of the flippin plane?? Especially the Engines and the landing gear?? Right....Those don't exist, I forgot.
 
bill smith said:
Let's look at the link and count the walls together. 1-2-3-4-5-6....and what about that one that crosses ? Could it be seven or even eight walls from entry to exit ?

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/PentagonRings.jpg Pentagon Rings
Click to expand...

bill
do me a favor and count the windows visible to the floor in the D ring
then do the same for the C ring
now we all know the heights of the rings are the same
so whats different?
heres a larger pic to help you
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/17.jpg
this might help you too
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/pentagon_sections.jpg
 
triforcharity said:
Because an 8 hour show wouldn't keep most people's attention.
Click to expand...
And that's really what it comes down to. Truther logic requires that quantity of words = more truth.

Over the weekend, I listened to the Craig vs. Cage debate on a canadian radio station (google craigvcage.mp3 randi and you'll find it if interested). Craig spoke clearly and concisely and delivered facts and expert opinion. Gage kept spinning from one thing into another, having trouble focusing on one question. Hoffman called in and went the same way. They simply lack the ability to think, so they keep connecting dots everywhere. Un-connecting them would take days, not hours, as they would keep pointing out new 'facts' that disprove the "official story." Whack-a-mole.
 
RedIbis said:
They didn't discuss WTC 7 or Shanksville either. Now why do you think that is?
Click to expand...


I think they didn't show it because there is only so much you can fit into the shows runtime. Why do you think that was the case? Are you implying that National Geographic are somehow a government loyalist entity and the show is a "hit-piece"? Or is it worse? They are actually part of the coverup?

RedIbis, not 10 minutes ago I mentioned you as one of the saner voices in the movement. A truther who didn't support the idea that "everybody is in on it". Maybe I should make an edit?
 
Pardalis said:
Actually, it wasn't an MIT guy, it was this guy:
Image33.png

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a154/perdalis/Image33.png who talked about this diagram:
Image44.png


In yellow the remains of the pilots, in blue the passengers.

Care to explain this Red?
Click to expand...

Pardalis said:
Could you comment on the diagram Mr. Sozen discussed in the show that I just posted? How did the DNA of the passengers and crew of flight 77 found its way in the Pentagon rubble, in that particular position?
Click to expand...

Take all the time you want to respond, Red, but I expect an answer before 2010.
 
Unsecured Coins said:
bill smith said:
I am choosey about who I learn from especially when I m reading false accounts like those of FEMA and NIST.
Click to expand...

quick! list everything in those explanations that were "false"
Click to expand...

You're missing the point; bill smith doesn't use the same definition of the word "false" as the rest of us. The actual definition of "false" in the above quote is "disagreeing with the beliefs of bill smith". What we as debunkers fail to appreciate is that, using the above definition, it is in fact reality that is "false".

Dave
 
apathoid said:
I think they didn't show it because there is only so much you can fit into the shows runtime. Why do you think that was the case? Are you implying that National Geographic are somehow a government loyalist entity and the show is a "hit-piece"? Or is it worse? They are actually part of the coverup?

RedIbis, not 10 minutes ago I mentioned you as one of the saner voices in the movement. A truther who didn't support the idea that "everybody is in on it". Maybe I should make an edit?
Click to expand...

You did? Where?

But yes, I think this is a hit piece. No, I don't think they are "in on it."
 
Look RedIbis is back! Perhaps he will be willing to discuss DNA evidence at the Pentagon. OK, that's a joke, he will fly away from it again, of course.
 
Pardalis said:
Take all the time you want to respond, Red, but I expect an answer before 2010.
Click to expand...
Oh look, the RedIbis is flying back here, maybe he'll finally address the DNA evidence!

RedIbis said:
You did? Where?

But yes, I think this is a hit piece. No, I don't think they are "in on it."
Click to expand...
Nope, 100% ignored again of course.

dtugg said:
Look RedIbis is back! Perhaps he will be willing to discuss DNA evidence at the Pentagon. OK, that's a joke, he will fly away from it again, of course.
Click to expand...
Yep, the slippery RedIbis has flown off again. And who can blame him? I mean, it's just not fair to him when facts and evidence get in the way of his religion of TRUTH.

Buh-bye little birdie, I'll be sure to point out your intellectual cowardice and dishonesty next time you flap your little wings and fly back!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom