Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

[The Big Dog]

It's been discussed to death and it wasn't covered in this production, so why do you keep bringing it up?

You've pointed out what you think are its flaws, and I am pointing out what I think are its flaws.

My think it is flawed because they don't use the rock solid evidence like the DNA evidence from the Pentagon.

What do you say Red, don't you think the documentary could have been improved by including rock solid evidence like the DNA from the Pentagon?

Or "has the rock solid evidence like the DNA from the Pentagon been discussed to death." At which point, we gotta ask why the hell you are here?

 

[LashL]

So how many walls did the plane have to penetrate including the exit wall ?

One reinforced wall at the entry point, and one unreinforced two-layer masonry wall at the A-E drive "punch out". Other than that, there were interior walls separating offices and such, but no other concrete or reinforced walls that the plane had to pass through.

And not a single "18 inch steel reinforced concrete" wall that I can see.

You posted that photo from the 911myths site. Had you read the page from which you took the photo, you would have known that positing what you did about multiple "18 inch steel reinforced concrete" walls was grossly inaccurate.

 

[Pardalis]

At which point, we gotta ask why the hell you are here?

Because the use of a tube-like object to simulate an airplane wasn't to his liking, and the voice of the narrator doesn't suit his personal tastes...

 

[WildCat]

It's been discussed to death and it wasn't covered in this production, so why do you keep bringing it up?

You've never answered the question Red. You run away like a schoolgirl from a spider whenever it's brought up.

I'm going to keep bringing it up until you grow a pair and answer it.

Care to answer it yet Red?

 

[WildCat]

Correct. My mistake. The production as a whole is quite forgettable. I'll stand by my other statement that this has been discussed ad nauseum by me and others.

You've never discussed it, liar. Or perhaps in Redibis world, discuss means "doing everything possible to avoid discussion"?

Links?

There will be no links forthcoming. RedIbis is lying. Quite typical of the liars and frauds that make up the "truth" movement.

 

[WildCat]

Care to elaborate on the six times claim Billie?

Or even just one time... there were no steel-reinforced concrete walls at the Pentagon.

 

[bill smith]

One reinforced wall at the entry point, and one unreinforced two-layer masonry wall at the A-E drive "punch out". Other than that, there were interior walls separating offices and such, but no other concrete or reinforced walls that the plane had to pass through.

And not a single "18 inch steel reinforced concrete" wall that I can see.

You posted that photo from the 911myths site. Had you read the page from which you took the photo, you would have known that positing what you did about multiple "18 inch steel reinforced concrete" walls was grossly inaccurate.

The exterior wall that the plane penetrated was the only reinforced tiny piece of the pentagon exterior. Work on the reinforcing had just finished a day or two before. See the cable drums and trailers and so on. Lord knows why he plane flew a three-quarter circle around the building to hit that particular piece especially when the offices of the top brass were on the opposite side of the structure.

But anyway the exterior wall was an 18'' armoured wall. The other walls may possibly not have been armoured but they were certainly thick concrete and not the office partition walls that you would have us beliieve. So we are still on a minimum of six concrete walls.

 

[A W Smith]

The exterior wall that the plane penetrated was the only reinforced tiny piece of the pentagon exterior. Work on the reinforcing had just finished a day or two before. See the cable drums and trailers and so on. Lord knows why he plane flew a three-quarter circle around the building to hit that particular piece especially when the offices of the top brass were on the directly opposite side of the structure.

But anyway the exterior wall was an 18'' armoured wall. The other walls may possibly not have been armoured but they were certainly thick conrete and not the office partition walls that you would have us beliieve. So we are still on a minimum of six concrete walls.

N0. there were not six concrete walls. you are a liar.

http://www.911myths.com/html/pentagon_rings_and_the_exit_ho.html

 

[Algebra34]

Is the thickness of the Pentagon ring walls top secret?

 

[WildCat]

So how many walls did the plane have to penetrate including the exit wall ?

2. And none of them were 18" of reinforced concrete, just common brick and limestone brick.

 

[dtugg]

The exterior wall that the plane penetrated was the only reinforced tiny piece of the pentagon exterior. Work on the reinforcing had just finished a day or two before. See the cable drums and trailers and so on. Lord knows why he plane flew a three-quarter circle around the building to hit that particular piece especially when the offices of the top brass were on the directly opposite side of the structure.

But anyway the exterior wall was an 18'' armoured wall. The other walls may possibly not have been armoured but they were certainly thick conrete and not the office partition walls that you would have us beliieve. So we are still on a minimum of six concrete walls.

You saying so isn't proof of anything. Actually, because you said so makes it less likely. You have negative credibility.

And he turned around because he was too high when he got close to the building.

 

[Baylor]

People do a lot of weird stuff on camera. Editors usually cut stuff like that out, unless they have some reason to make the subject look bad.

Weasel Words! And besides why would they edit it? He did it while Gage and Grifter were trying to dig themselves out of a hole. Avery was playing with his face the entire time. It couldn't have got more disgusting even if he pulled down his pants and showed us his best mangina.

 

[LashL]

The exterior wall that the plane penetrated was the only reinforced tiny piece of the pentagon exterior. Work on the reinforcing had just finished a day or two before. See the cable drums and trailers and so on. Lord knows why he plane flew a three-quarter circle around the building to hit that particular piece especially when the offices of the top brass were on the directly opposite side of the structure.

But anyway the exterior wall was an 18'' armoured wall. The other walls may possibly not have been armoured but they were certainly thick concrete and not the office partition walls that you would have us beliieve. So we are still on a minimum of six concrete walls.

No, billsmith, your post is inaccurate. You should read this report and stop spreading falsehoods.

 

[Mancman]

Let's look at the link and count the walls together. 1-2-3-4-5-6....and what about that one that crosses ? Could it be seven or even eight walls from entry to exit ?

http://www.911myths.com/assets/images/PentagonRings.jpg Pentagon Rings

Wrong Bill. Note how the lightwells have 3 storeys exposed, whilst at the exit hole there are are 5 (4 windows high + windowless ground floor).

The bottom 2 floors had no rings hence no masonry walls. Just offices.

And you're the guys who are gonna blow this whole thing open, yet you aren't even capable of counting some windows. It's really sad.

 

[bill smith]

No, billsmith, your post is inaccurate. You should read this report and stop spreading falsehoods.

I don't usually read fairytales any more but maybe I will flick through it.

 

[RedIbis]

You've pointed out what you think are its flaws, and I am pointing out what I think are its flaws.

My think it is flawed because they don't use the rock solid evidence like the DNA evidence from the Pentagon.

What do you say Red, don't you think the documentary could have been improved by including rock solid evidence like the DNA from the Pentagon?

Or "has the rock solid evidence like the DNA from the Pentagon been discussed to death." At which point, we gotta ask why the hell you are here?

They didn't discuss WTC 7 or Shanksville either. Now why do you think that is?

 

[LashL]

I don't usually read fairytales any more but maybe I will flick through it.

Considering that you have not read it, you are in no position to call a detailed report by qualified engineers a fairy tale. You will find, if and when you do deign to educate yourself, that the exterior walls were not "steel reinforced concrete" nor 18 inches thick. The exterior at the location of the crash was masonry and limestone, to which steel supports had been added.

 

[WildCat]

They didn't discuss WTC 7 or Shanksville either. Now why do you think that is?

I'm sure it's nothing like your refusal to discuss the DNA evidence at the Pentagon, or your blatant lie claiming that you actually have before.

You see, NG had time constraints. You have avoided these questions for years Red.

But it's good to see you keep confirming for the new people here what a complete coward you are, as well as a liar.

 

[technoextreme]

They didn't discuss WTC 7 or Shanksville either. Now why do you think that is?

They did discuss Shanksville you [Rule 10].

 

[Mr.Herbert]

They didn't discuss WTC 7 or Shanksville either. Now why do you think that is?

Because it was a two hour program. They also showed that fire does weaken steel. So, that covered WTC-7.

The "guests" on the show looked stupid enough. Would you have wanted Mr. Griffin discussing the voice morphing fake calls from flight 93?? Yeah, that would have made him look better.