Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

Disbelief said:
Actually, it would be called common sense. Once again, not that difficult of a concept for most people.
Click to expand...

Well, I've seen plenty of occasions where people reply for others and generally jump into a conversation, so don't get too tetchy.
 
Ragnarok said:
Well, I've seen plenty of occasions where people reply for others and generally jump into a conversation, so don't get too tetchy.
Click to expand...

If you agree flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, then why did you "jump in" my conversation with Rd Ibis?
 
dtugg said:
RedIbis said:
I didn't see Heiwa in the NatGeo show.
Click to expand...

True. However, this moron was on it:

Gagebox-full-full.jpg
Click to expand...
Hmm... Does that mean Gage is considered more knowledgeable than Heiwa? :boggled:
 
carlitos said:
Why, did you think I was addressing you?
Click to expand...

Concerning your last post, I will point out that you followed the word "why" with a comma. This indicates that you are not asking Ragnarok why he thought you were addressing him, but that you are inquiring whether or not he thought you were addressing him.

Furthermore I will explain that your previous post was an editorial type of comment on Ragnarok's statement that was directed to the JREF members in general.

I'll start with an easy one; Gouda
 
Last edited:
RedIbis said:
TAM, I consider you above this type of stuff. The show did not present any evidence whatsoever. The tests they did had no relevance and those who conducted them admitted the limitations of these pony shows.
Click to expand...

haven't seen it. It was more a comment on the "expected" response from a truther, which tends to be the default "faked or planted" claim, rather then directed specifically at you.

I find the big production shows tend to brush over the issues anyway, but at least this one approached the Thermite issue, unlike others.

I will reserve further comment, either way, until I have had a chance to watch it (damn canadian NG channel).

TAM:)
 
Ragnarok, why wouldn't the conspirators just fly planes into buildings?

Why would anyone try to frame someone for a crime by committing a completely different crime...or (depending on whatever theories you currently subscribe to) the same basic crime but through completely different means?

Do you believe that if the towers hadn't collapsed, 9/11 wouldn't still be considered the most (in)famous terrorist attack in history?

Do you believe that if the towers hadn't collapsed, the Bush Administration wouldn't/couldn't have exploited the attacks to further their own agenda?
 
Last edited:
WildCat said:
Were the remains of the passengers and crew of Flight 77, identified via DNA, found inside Pentagon? "Yes" or "no" will do Red.

Note to all: RedIbis will not answer this question.
Click to expand...
And, as always, RedIbis has cowardly flown off again to avoid answering a simple question. How unsurprising!
 
jaydeehess said:
Concerning your last post, I will point out that you followed the word "why" with a comma. This indicates that you are not asking Ragnarok why he thought you were addressing him, but that you are inquiring whether or not he thought you were addressing him.

Furthermore I will explain that your previous post was an editorial type of comment on Ragnarok's statement that was directed to the JREF members in general.

I'll start with an easy one; Gouda
Click to expand...

Considerate of you to point that out, since I didn't elaborate.

Havarti on, dude.
 
WUBRINY63 said:
Man oh man. DRG thoroughly destroys this NG hit piece. Any truther or debunker should listen to how DRG rips this thing apart in less then 30 minutes. The take on the chicken coop episode (which I missed the other night) was particularly hilarious.
Click to expand...
DRG rips apart NG with hearsay, lies and delusions.

No Pulitzer Prize? Is there a category for worst lie? most moronic idea? nut case extra crazy statements? No, No, No, No

oh mannnnnnnnnnnn
 
WUBRINY63 said:
Man oh man. DRG thoroughly destroys this NG hit piece. Any truther or debunker should listen to how DRG rips this thing apart in less then 30 minutes. The take on the chicken coop episode (which I missed the other night) was particularly hilarious.
Click to expand...

Jack Blood?!?

Gee, that is a very influential pack of douchebags that listen to that show!

I am thinking that tomorrow, there may be several very significant discussions in the nation's meth labs.

/you do know that DRG is a theology professor and terrorist profiteer don't you?
 
KJC said:
Is this docu online yet?
Click to expand...

I found it through a torrent site so it's out there but I had a dickens of a time finding it. I went back to the site I got it from to give you a link but it's gone now. It's 756 mb, too big for free sites to host or I'd upload it.
 
I found a torrent. I'm not sure if you're allowed to give links to those sites so I won't. All you need to do is go to isohunt.com and search for "national geographic 9/11"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom