Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

[dtugg]

What's up, bs?

102 days.

 

[beachnut]

DRG discusses the NG hit piece.
http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Jack-Blood-32k-090109.mp3

DRG is wrong. He makes money selling lies and you buy them. You can't support one thing he said with evidence. You post lies, and no comment spam about 911.

 

[Mr.Herbert]

DRG discusses the NG hit piece.
http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Jack-Blood-32k-090109.mp3

Does he discuss why he didn't bring any evidence with him to back up HIS claims?

Too bad Mackey or Gravy were not invited to be there with them.

 

[T.A.M.]

DRG analyzing anything is a great bit of humor in itself.

TAM

 

[RedIbis]

It is not that he doesn't acknowledge it. He simply pulls out the good old truther disclaimer/out clause...

When presented with evidence that refutes your theory, CLAIM IT WAS FAKED OR PLANTED.

TAM

TAM, I consider you above this type of stuff. The show did not present any evidence whatsoever. The tests they did had no relevance and those who conducted them admitted the limitations of these pony shows.

 

[nicepants]

DRG discusses the NG hit piece.
http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Jack-Blood-32k-090109.mp3

So the truthers are now officially classifying this as a "hit piece"?

Let me put on my shocked face.

 

[WildCat]

TAM, I consider you above this type of stuff. The show did not present any evidence whatsoever. The tests they did had no relevance and those who conducted them admitted the limitations of these pony shows.

Were the remains of the passengers and crew of Flight 77, identified via DNA, found inside Pentagon? "Yes" or "no" will do Red.

Note to all: RedIbis will not answer this question.

 

[nicepants]

TAM, I consider you above this type of stuff. The show did not present any evidence whatsoever. The tests they did had no relevance and those who conducted them admitted the limitations of these pony shows.

Based on that, I presume you agree that Richard Gage's cardboard box experiment was not relevant?

As to the show: What kind of tests would have been relevant?

 

[funk de fino]

TAM, I consider you above this type of stuff. The show did not present any evidence whatsoever. The tests they did had no relevance and those who conducted them admitted the limitations of these pony shows.

It's the target audience that makes it necessary to dumb it down. The 911 TM is full of dumb people with no intergrity and a lack of rational thinking skills.

 

[Pardalis]

TAM, I consider you above this type of stuff. The show did not present any evidence whatsoever. The tests they did had no relevance and those who conducted them admitted the limitations of these pony shows.

So what do you have to say about the DNA evidence?

You've been avoiding that question for years.

 

[beachnut]

Historically 9/11 will always be revisited. This special wasn't doing that. This special focused on the very conspiracy theories that most debunkers claim are disrespectful to 9/11 victims and families. Will there be another one next year?

Historically there are idiots who can't figure out reality. Like JFK, Bigfoot and other nut case conspiracies and myths, 911 crackpot conspiracy theories will thrive on doltish minds as long as ignorance exists.

 

[Ragnarok]

Look who's talking, all you've got are crummy home made videos on youtube.

Maybe that's because they were all that were ever made available?

So what do you have to say about the DNA evidence?

You've been avoiding that question for years.

Who's arguing whether or not there was passengers aboard, again?

 

[Ragnarok]

Historically there are idiots who can't figure out reality. Like JFK, Bigfoot and other nut case conspiracies and myths, 911 crackpot conspiracy theories will thrive on doltish minds as long as ignorance exists.

This was another reality announcment, courtesy of the ever eloquent beachnut.

 

[Disbelief]

Who's arguing whether or not there was passengers aboard, again?

This is how the quote box works. I quoted you, so I am addressing you. Pardalis quoted redIbis, so he was addressing RedIbis. Not really that difficult of a concept.

 

[Pardalis]

Who's arguing whether or not there was passengers aboard, again?

Well if your contention is that there were no plane, then logically there couldn't have been passengers aboard, right genius?

 

[The Big Dog]

TAM, I consider you above this type of stuff. The show did not present any evidence whatsoever. The tests they did had no relevance and those who conducted them admitted the limitations of these pony shows.

In your opinion the tests had no relevance because you believe in super thermite, even though Jones and his boys' own data conclusively established that it was not thermite.

I've already said that the NatGeo piece was fluff, a real description of the debris at the Pentagon, for example, would have included descriptions from the responders at the site and would have also included discussion of the human remains and DNA evidence. And the evidence from the Moussiani trial.

What is your opinion of the DNA evidence RED?

 

[Ragnarok]

This is how the quote box works. I quoted you, so I am addressing you. Pardalis quoted redIbis, so he was addressing RedIbis. Not really that difficult of a concept.

Is that a universal law, or one you've just pulled out of your ass?

Keep it civil please.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Gaspode

 

[Ragnarok]

Well if your contention is that there were no plane, then logically there couldn't have been passengers aboard, right genius?

I never said there were no planes, either, genius.

 

[Pardalis]

I never said there were no planes, either, genius.

So you agree flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon? So why are you here arguing then?

 

[Disbelief]

Is that a universal law, or one you've just pulled out of your ass?

Actually, it would be called common sense. Once again, not that difficult of a concept for most people.