Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

[Baylor]

Here's part of it for those who don't have NG.

 

[jaydeehess]

The former will return any indexed page that has the terms "mark" and "roberts" and "911." It is less specific and will return hits that have nothing to do with Mark Roberts. For example, the page could be talking about some guy with the first name Mark and then later talk some different person with the last name Roberts. The latter is more specific and will only generate hits for pages with "mark roberts" and "911".

I should have been more specific. I know the utility of using quotes, I was inquiring as to the relevence of the number of hits a search produces.

What is it supposed to mean one way or the other? I would imagine that the actual number of searches concerning any thing to do with 911 conspiracies, or the debunking of same, has dropped significantly in the last 7 years. That would be more relevent though, than the number of internet pages that a search produces.

 

[jaydeehess]

The higher the hit count, the closer to Jesus.

Because a search string of the single word "jesus" produces 94 million hits?

Well, ya know, he had a 2000 year head start!!

 

[jaydeehess]

I think we will see increasing amounts of this kind of programming.

Yes, I agree. That is due to the time that has passed and the fact that they (producers) will now not be accused of pandering to the lastest story by way of the "if it bleeds, it leads" mentality.

they feel the need to talk it down.

Talk what "down", the conspiracy theories?

It's too late though I think. In fact I suspect that they are shooting themselves in the foot.

Is that the "all publicity is good publicity" line of thought , bill? You do know that it isn't really true. It may lead to a few more people looking into it but is not likely to lead to too many more believing the CT's concerning 911. Except for a few who were around 6 years old in 2001. Anyone over the age of 13 in 2001 who does not know about the 911 CT's likely does not give a rat's gluteus about any CT.

Your 'movement' is destined for the stagnant backwaters of history along with the 'Apollo Hoax', and 'Paul MacCartney is dead' groups.

 

[jaydeehess]

If you don't aleady know I for one am not willing to explain it to you. You will find out when you grow up.

On another forum I had one poster who was extremely reluctant to give the name of a person in a photo he included in one post. I was told that people who use his name in internet forums concerning 911 have accidents or are otherwise befallen of some ill. It turns out the photo was on George Soros.

I typed his name in three times in a following post and he did not appear and kill me.

Go ahead bill, the boogeyman will not bite you in the *** if you utter his (their) name(s).

It all comes down to who do you want to charge, with what crime, for the events of 911, or the supposed cover up afterwards?
Can you answer that much bill?

Are Nat Geo and PM 'in-on-it'?
Are the execs of the media, worldwide, also 'in-on-it'?

How many people;
-knew of the plan
-arranged for the various explosives, fake planes, nano-thermite etc., etc., etc.
-contributed knowingly to the cover up of the 'truth' (from NIST and FEMA , the MSM, and military)

 

[Newtons Bit]

Because a search string of the single word "jesus" produces 94 million hits?

Well, ya know, he had a 2000 year head start!!

It must be a really common name too. I hear people using it all the time.

 

[applecorped]

Your 'movement' is destined for the stagnant backwaters of history along with the 'Apollo Hoax', and 'Paul MacCartney is dead' groups.

True, but the Paul McCartney is dead movement will eventually be correct.

 

[Mr.Herbert]

True, but the Paul McCartney is dead movement will eventually be correct.

Nominated

 

[nicepants]

So are the truthers already denouncing NatGeo as being government shills? Or are they withholding judgement until they see the program?

 

[Edx]

What I want to know is how Jones and Harrit came up with Nano Thermite at all.

Such as, since there is so little information about real nano thermite what is it about their "findings" that say "nano" rather than just regular thermite?

 

[KJC]

I hope I'll be able to watch this online sometime soon. Can't watch it tonight because the wife wants to watch her stupid film :/

 

[WildCat]

12 minutes to showtime!

 

[Juniversal]

*Grabs pop corn*

 

[WildCat]

Hey, Dylan admits that there's lots of crazy people in the truth movement. But he doesn't realize that he's one of them.

 

[triforcharity]

I about fell over myself.

Oh, and so far we have seen Gage and Jones, wonder whome else we can get.

 

[Thunder]

So are the truthers already denouncing NatGeo as being government shills? Or are they withholding judgement until they see the program?

Clearly, anyone who doesn't advocate for the theories of 9-11 Truth MUST be a government shill.

I mean, honestly, using your own critical thinking skills and deciding that 9-11 was NOT an inside job? Its just incomprehensible.

 

[Drudgewire]

"It's more dramatic (or was it "compelling") for me to say it was a controlled demolition."

And there's your 9/11 movement, folks.

 

[TJM]

Am I wrong or did Gage just say the entire demolition industry won't come forward because they'll lose the govt contracts?

 

[WildCat]

Am I wrong or did Gage just say the entire demolition industry won't come forward because they'll lose the govt contracts?

Ayup.

 

[JamesB]

Watching it now. They get a steel beam to collapse in a jet fuel fire. It reaches over 2000 degrees and collapses in 3:50. Not like the troothers will care, but devastating

No fires reached above 350 degrees!

Fire can't melt steel!