Split Thread WTC7 is a problem for the 9/11 official story

[Pardalis]

I do not think that the idea Flight 93 was intended to be flown into WTC 7 is very plausible.

It took you four hours to answer that? What about the rest of his theory?

Now Pardalis, are you willing to admit you misrepresented Bill's position?

I didn't misrepresent it, it just turned out to be even more stupid than I thought.

]and we can go back to how there's no physical evidence to back up NIST's WTC 7 collapse hypothesis.

No, there are plenty of threads about that already, this is about Bill's theory. You just think it's "not very plausible"? You're much too kind to it. How about plain stupid?

Let's have another look, just the WTC 7 part:

Then I thought 'perhaps an airliner was meant to hit WTC7 too ''- but for some reason it did not arrive so the perps lit some fires on various floors of the building in the hope that they would connect up and cause a big enough fire to allow the bilding to be demolished under cover of the blaze. Unfortunately the fire did not eally catch and they had to go ahead and demolish the building anyway at 5:20 in the afternoon.

How would you describe this?

Given how difficult it is to you to answer simple questions, I'll wait a few days for your response.

 

[RedIbis]

It took you four hours to answer that?

I work. What do you do all day?

I didn't misrepresent it, it just turned out to be even more stupid than I thought.

You most certainly misrepresented his position as I've already laid out. Around here it's called lying.

 

[Pardalis]

I work. What do you do all day?

I work at home, I'm a freelance illustrator.

You most certainly misrepresented his position as I've already laid out. Around here it's called lying.

How about answering my question? That's called evasion, or intellectual cowardice.

 

[bill smith]

My refusal to answer? This is an internet forum. People have jobs. There's time to sign on and post, there are other times when that is not possible. Chill out.

I do not think that the idea Flight 93 was intended to be flown into WTC 7 is very plausible.

Now Pardalis, are you willing to admit you misrepresented Bill's position? This is the jref where even the slightest shades of meaning are excuses for accusations of mendacity. Yours was blatent and intended to exaggerate his position, unnecessarily.

A simple mea culpa will do and we can go back to how there's no physical evidence to back up NIST's WTC 7 collapse hypothesis.

Have you any specific reasons for why you think it would be implausible?

 

[carlitos]

"the perps lit some fires on various floors of the building"

It would be funny if it wasn't accusing so many people of being accessories to mass murder. As it stands, it's quite pathetic.

 

[Pardalis]

"the perps lit some fires on various floors of the building"

Don't forget, they lit some fires in a building already pre-rigged with explosives and incendiaries.



Let's give Red some time to comment on how he feels about this theory.

 

[bill smith]

Don't forget, they lit some fires in a building already pre-rigged with explosives and incendiaries.



Let's give Red some time to comment on how he feels about this theory.

Ah well....it's almost four hours now so what the hell.

The nanothermite was inside the core columns which were well fireproofed.. There was no fear of standard office fires ignting the thermite prematurely.

 

[twinstead]

Don't forget, they lit some fires in a building already pre-rigged with explosives and incendiaries.



Let's give Red some time to comment on how he feels about this theory.

Well, it appears bill thinks that demo teams went into the building sometime between the first plane strike and the WTC7 collapse and planted demo charges, and red thinks that somehow the building was pre-rigged.......sorry I almost spit my coffee through my nose, excuse me.....with explosives. But, I can't be sure because bill spews a steady stream of nonsense and Red refuses to commit to any position at all.

ETA:

The nanothermite was inside the core columns which were well fireprofed.. There was no fear of standard office fires ignting the thermite prematurely.

It appears I was wrong about bill's position. Here it is in all it wonderfully crazy glory. The boy evidentially thinks the building was freakin' built with thermite in it LOL

 

[oldhat]

The nanothermite was inside the core columns which were well fireproofed.. There was no fear of standard office fires ignting the thermite prematurely.

So this conspiracy was planned decades ago, when WTC7 was originally built? Hmm...

 

[RedIbis]

Have you any specific reasons for why you think it would be implausible?

It's very speculative. And for that reason I don't see why the plane wouldn't have been destined for the Capital or other high profile bldgs that have been mentioned. Since there is no real evidence for where Flight 93 was supposed to end up, I don't see how WTC 7 is more plausible than these other targets.

If you want to talk strictly hypothetically, an Inside Job theory could suggest that the WTC 7 was supposed to be brought down when the towers collapsed, but it simply didn't go as planned, and was brought down later in the day. Hypothetically speaking of course.

 

[Pardalis]

Ah well....it's almost four hours now so what the hell.

You still haven't answer my original question.

The nanothermite was inside the core columns which were well fireprofed..

We're talking about WTC 7.

 

[RedIbis]

I work at home, I'm a freelance illustrator.

So you're unemployed.

 

[carlitos]

Maybe the nanothermite was installed through the fireproofed columns themselves, it being, well, nano and all.

We're talking about WTC 7.

Doh!

 

[Pardalis]

So you're unemployed.

Yes I am, I am currently working on a storyboard for a car commercial.

Anything else you want to know?

 

[bill smith]

Well, it appears bill thinks that demo teams went into the building sometime between the first plane strike and the WTC7 collapse and planted demo charges, and red thinks that somehow the building was pre-rigged.......sorry I almost spit my coffee through my nose, excuse me.....with explosives. But, I can't be sure because bill spews a steady stream of nonsense and Red refuses to commit to any position at all.

ETA:



It appears I was wrong about bill's position. Here it is in all it wonderfully crazy glory. The boy evidentially thinks the building was freakin' built with thermite in it LOL

It was so simple......they just drilled a hole in a column. charged it slightly. inserted the nozzle of a spray gun and sprayed the stuff on to whatever thckness they required. Filled it up even.In every column on every floor if they had chosen to.

 

[funk de fino]

So you're unemployed.

Better than being a proven liar. At least he could get a job.

 

[CHF]

It was so simple......they just drilled a hole in a column. charged it slightly. inserted the nozzle of a spray gun and sprayed the stuff on to whatever thckness they required. Filled it up even.In every column on every floor if they had chosen to.

Bill, you're still just making stuff up.

At some point do you plan on moving beyond that stage?

 

[RedIbis]

Yes I am, I am currently working on a storyboard for a car commercial.

Anything else you want to know?

No, not at the moment. Good luck with the account.

 

[oldhat]

It was so simple......they just drilled a hole in a column. charged it slightly. inserted the nozzle of a spray gun and sprayed the stuff on to whatever thckness they required. Filled it up even.In every column on every floor if they had chosen to.

laughingdog.gif

 

[Pardalis]

What clumsy conspirators. Think about it, the plane didn't show up in time, so they had to plant fires that didn't "catch" and turned out not big enough, so they had to demolish it anyway and risk being uncovered.

If I were George Bush, I'd ask for my money back. These conspirators won't be called on again.