• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Encountered my first "Truther" today

RedIbis said:
outlandish claims + everchanging story + no verification = exposed as a fabrication.
Click to expand...

Oh now that is FUNNY...

coming from someone whot regularly makes outlandish claims, with everchanging stories and NO everification of his LIES...

Hey pot, it is the kettle, you are black

Try again
 
TruthersLie said:
Oh now that is FUNNY...

coming from someone whot regularly makes outlandish claims, with everchanging stories and NO everification of his LIES...

Hey pot, it is the kettle, you are black

Try again
Click to expand...

What outlandish claims have I made "regularly"?
 
RedIbis said:
What outlandish claims have I made "regularly"?
Click to expand...

how about your basic that no jet fuel was in the soil at shanksville for a start? that is pretty common. Or your other regular bs claims that piss all over the dead and **** on the living... I'm sure others will most definately want to jump on this one.

and you have a whole heaping list of outlandish claims...

your most current is the BS about tri fabricating his story and that is was exposed as a fabrication... (you know ... shown to be a lie....which post of your showed it to be a lie again?)
 
TruthersLie said:
how about your basic that no jet fuel was in the soil at shanksville for a start? that is pretty common. Or your other regular bs claims that piss all over the dead and **** on the living... I'm sure others will most definately want to jump on this one.

and you have a whole heaping list of outlandish claims...

your most current is the BS about tri fabricating his story and that is was exposed as a fabrication... (you know ... shown to be a lie....which post of your showed it to be a lie again?)
Click to expand...

Where did I claim there was no jet fuel at Shanksville? My argument on that topic is that there is no EPA soil report that describes extensive jet fuel contamination.

So your tally is one misrepresented position and Tri's unsubstantiated story. Good job, and as you say I'm sure your friends will come running to your defense and also misrepresent my positions.
 
RedIbis said:
Where did I claim there was no jet fuel at Shanksville? My argument on that topic is that there is no EPA soil report that describes extensive jet fuel contamination.
....
Click to expand...
Who said Fire? Yes, fire turns the jet fuel to what class? What was that again?
... what? ... oh? ...
flight93AirBusB52.jpg

Here is proof of fire in PA, and an example from France, and a B-52 jet fuel fire in WA of USA. So these were big fires over 5,000 gallons of jet fuel give or take -10,000 pounds to + 30,000 pounds. Yes, Johnny you can say pounds or gallons and do you know the weight of Jet Fuel? ... Yes, and it does vary with what? ... Good job.

But you want photos of the arrest? or what? At least it was not Dr Jones acting like a deranged follower; it was just people like Dr Jones make up the lies that make idiots stand behind cars and act like idiots.
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
Who said Fire? Yes, fire turns the jet fuel to what class? What was that again?
... what? ... oh? ...
[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/flight93AirBusB52.jpg[/qimg]
Here is proof of fire in PA, and an example from France, and a B-52 jet fuel fire in WA of USA. So these were big fires over 5,000 gallons of jet fuel give or take -10,000 pounds to + 30,000 pounds. Yes, Johnny you can say pounds or gallons and do you know the weight of Jet Fuel? ... Yes, and it does vary with what? ... Good job.

But you want photos of the arrest? or what? At least it was not Dr Jones acting like a deranged follower; it was just people like Dr Jones make up the lies that make idiots stand behind cars and act like idiots.
Click to expand...

How do smoke plumes equal soil contamination?
 
Dave Rogers said:
Truther behaving like an insane person != outlandish claim.
Added details != everchanging story.
Personal incredulity != exposed as a fabrication.
Stating known falsehood = lie.

Dave
Click to expand...

This is outlandish going from this:

Now, he is being charged with a felony, and a misdemeanor. He is still in jail under no bail, as the judge deamed him a threat to the community. So, they gave him no bond.
to this:
Click to expand...

To this:
Quote:
They will be filing charges for the following charges, due to my opinion on the case.

Obstructing the flow of traffic
Harassment of a LEO/Firefighter/EMT
Click to expand...
 
RedIbis said:
This is outlandish going from this:



To this:
Click to expand...

Yes because updates to a court case are outlandish and never happen... Something tells me you're not quite familiar with what happens in the courts...
 
How is that outlandish Red? Charges are reduced all of the time to make prosecution easier and to ease the burden on the court system. Try again.
 
If you really think this is outlandish, contact someone knowledgeable in this field and ask them. There is nothing unusual about this at all.
 
Dave Rogers said:
Court makes decision. Court receives additional information. Court revises decision in the light of the additional information.

Yes, I can see why a truther would find that outlandish.

Dave
Click to expand...

Yeah, judges always reduce charges for a minor from a felony, held without bail without bond, deemed a threat to the community, to a misdemeanor, all on the opinion of the victim.

I'm sure this is what happened since we have so much support for his story.
 
RedIbis said:
Yeah, judges always reduce charges for a minor from a felony, held without bail without bond, deemed a threat to the community, to a misdemeanor, all on the opinion of the victim.
Click to expand...

We've already heard your repeated expressions of personal incredulity. Without disproof, your lie is still a lie.

Dave
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom