• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

CTists: Who do you think we are?

At some point, for this site to not become a joke (and sadly due to the trolls and those who feed them, it has), moderation must step and say, enough is enough. This topic has been beaten to death and kill it and only allowing it to be resurrected when something new is claimed. Of course that would effectively kill the 9/11 CT sub forum.

They cannot. No broken rules or some other idiocy? He is free to post.

However theoretically it could be either off-topicness or flooding...
 
Hey! I got noticed! ;)


Has anyone else noticed DC being a much nicer person since Obama was sworn in? And people say Obama hasn't accomplished anything!

thanks :) you should have seen me when Nader would have won :D
 
Has anyone else noticed DC being a much nicer person since Obama was sworn in? And people say Obama hasn't accomplished anything!


DC has always been a nice person, even when he used to argue in favour of ideas you think are wrong/mad/dangerous. This thread in light of the demonisation of "truthers" that's going on and is now the major theme of the 911 ct subforum, is really absurd. Pure projection.

I have very different opinions about the "debunkers" here, and many are not very favorable - but no opinion about aggle-rithm at all, f.e. Maybe a "Controlled Demolition" debunker - i don't read those threads.

But who does he think "we" are?
 
I assume that people see a banner saying "a place to discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly and lively way" and assume that that's what they'll get.

As an aside, in a truly skeptic "community" Heiwa would have been neutralised very quickly and faded into the background but, you guys have become so entrenched in your behaviour patterns that he now has two threads containing over 2000 posts to his name.
You bring delusions, you need evidence to support your ideas or they become lies and delusions. You bring lies and delusions as your evidence and spew failed moronic opinions. Not very skeptical and zero critical thinking are involved as you cut and paste your plagiarized opinions on 911.

You fail to see Heiwa can't use physics or engineering to prove his point so he repeats his lie over and over. If you can't figure out Heiwa is telling a lie you lack knowledge and instead of complaining about Heiwa persistence by blaming those who have knowledge you should gain knowledge and show us all up how smart and great you are; but you only talk and failed to provide calculations to show Heiwa wrong. If you had evidence your support for moronic conclusions on 911 would fade into the background. When will that happen? Heiwa has a problem posting delusions, the same with you.

Heiwa = 3. Those who present their case about the conspiracy theory by simply stating unfounded conclusions over and over again. Which one are you?
 
Last edited:
It would also lead to triumphant whingeing about censorship among the truthers, who would claim that the mass banning of 9/11 Truth from the forum specifically set up by the government to oppose them is the final proof that they were right all along and that the whole thing is a conspiracy to shut them up.

Dave

The mere fact that this place has any rules at all, coupled with truthers´ absolute inability to abide by these rules, and their stubborn refusal to admit when they violate rules, already leads to whingeing about censorship among the truthers - didn´t you notice?

Nothing we could do, short of granting every truther complete exemption from all rules, and at the same time permanently banning every debunker on the forum, could possibly make the truthers stop claiming censorship.

It is therefore pointless not to do something, in a doomed attempt to appease the truthers.
 
As an aside, in a truly skeptic "community" Heiwa would have been neutralised very quickly and faded into the background but, you guys have become so entrenched in your behaviour patterns that he now has two threads containing over 2000 posts to his name.


You have to understand that releaseeabode subscribes to the logical fallacy that if you ignore the person you disagree with, you automatically win the argument, or an "argumentum ad ignoreantiam":rolleyes:

As much as I hate to admit it, he sort of has a point, and this is coming from one of the 700 people currently on his ignore list.
 
Is that supposed to be some sort of a credit?

You tell me.

I merely observed that a poster and a topic that could have been done with in less than 50 posts has two threads with over 2000 posts in. The posts are mostly irrelevant but the eye does get drawn to a thread that contains a lot of traffic.

Go across to EVC forums and take a look.
 
The mere fact that this place has any rules at all, coupled with truthers´ absolute inability to abide by these rules, and their stubborn refusal to admit when they violate rules, already leads to whingeing about censorship among the truthers - didn´t you notice?

Nothing we could do, short of granting every truther complete exemption from all rules, and at the same time permanently banning every debunker on the forum, could possibly make the truthers stop claiming censorship.

It is therefore pointless not to do something, in a doomed attempt to appease the truthers.

Your post demonstrates an inability to be objective about this subject which is why you will always be a part of the problem and never the solution.
 
Heiwa has been 'neutralized' repeatably. However, internet forums are like cartoons: If a guy is run over by a steam-roller, he does not die. He doesn't even bleed. He just pops back in shape after a short while.

Not that I want Heiwa to die or bleed, but that is the reason he does not stay neutralized.

That said, I'm often amazed at how many people keep bothering with such people, but there is actually another thread about that.

Hans

If doing the same old thing, over, and over, and over does not change the outcome then try something different!
 
You tell me.

I merely observed that a poster and a topic that could have been done with in less than 50 posts has two threads with over 2000 posts in. The posts are mostly irrelevant but the eye does get drawn to a thread that contains a lot of traffic.

Go across to EVC forums and take a look.

Perhaps you missed this.

chillzero (moderator) said:
Thread closed. Heiwa, stop flooding the forum with the same discussion. This is the same discussion on the same concepts as your previous threads.
 
After posting in this thread I was going through the forum and found...

All of You, Who Once Believed in 9/11 Truth, Share Your Experiences

Which I thought looked interesting, a fairly obvious winner for this forum. Started reading first page, very interesting, the sort of stuff that could be a staging post for getting minds opened.

I didn't see any trolling "Truthers" in that thread just some honest and open exchanging. Then, in the following pages, two moderator warnings and two pages of bickering and irrelevance. Thread effect destroyed.

You guys are lucky that "Truthers" do come onto this forum because I'm sure that if they didn't you would implode. It seems that anyone who does not buy into the orthodox opinion is outcast. While there are people far away from that orthodoxy they are the target but, if they were removed you would just turn on next furthest group. Agnositicism is not acceptable to the most fundamentalist Atheist.

That's who you are.
 
You guys are lucky that "Truthers" do come onto this forum because I'm sure that if they didn't you would implode. It seems that anyone who does not buy into the orthodox opinion is outcast. While there are people far away from that orthodoxy they are the target but, if they were removed you would just turn on next furthest group. Agnositicism is not acceptable to the most fundamentalist Atheist.
actually if truthers stopped coming this section of the forum would get pretty quiet and probably be closed

debunking requires a steady stream of bunk :D
 
Of course that's before the NWO paid me to switch sides, but if it makes the CTers feel better I ONLY accept Ameros and gold as payment (and hookers. Lots and lots of hookers).

You, sir, are the reason all of us government shills get called morally bankrupt. I never accept hookers as payment. I prefer to be paid in suitable offerings to Moloch at the annual shills' picnic in Bohemian Grove.
 
I merely observed that a poster and a topic that could have been done with in less than 50 posts has two threads with over 2000 posts in.

Given that the poster in question simply repeats his assertions in response to counter-arguments and will continue to do so ad nauseam, how would you describe a situation in which the subject is "done with"?

Dave
 
But who does he think "we" are?

Just people. Irrational, agenda-driven, paranoid, proudly uncurious, but people, nonetheless.

I have a theory that the CT mindset is all about leveling the playing field. You take the atrocities away from the scary, evil people, and attribute them to people in authority and who are admired and respected by many. In one, fell swoop you have disarmed the evil and discredited the powerful. Now the CT's, armed with the "truth", are no longer non-entities surfing the web in their mothers' basements. Suddenly, they are right there in the game along with everyone else -- as long as no one destroys the illusion by insisting that they actually articulate what they believe.

A pleasant fantasy for them, I'm sure, but not one I'd want to share. I prefer reality.
 
actually if truthers stopped coming this section of the forum would get pretty quiet and probably be closed

debunking requires a steady stream of bunk :D

In other words, it's the Truther's fault for coming here, you take no responsibility for your own actions whatsoever?
 

Back
Top Bottom