Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

[TexasJack]

First Popular Mechanics, and now National Geographic, you guys are classic. I just wonder how many truthers thought highly of the two before they burst your bubble.

 

[Galileo]

First Popular Mechanics, and now National Geographic, you guys are classic. I just wonder how many truthers thought highly of the two before they burst your bubble.

First, 20 something hacks who write about souped up cars are thermite experts.

Now, those who study topless women in Africa are experts on nano-thermite.

What's next?

 

[Justin39640]

Try using the quotes like orphia nay recommends. Most of your hits are for "9/11". Not "Mark" or "Roberts"

yea and?
truthers never cared about that only numbers

check out this thread started by one of your fellow truthers
and the smack down that followed
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=149943

 

[Architect]

First, 20 something hacks who write about souped up cars are thermite experts.

Now, those who study topless women in Africa are experts on nano-thermite.

What's next?

Exactly. And what about those who study, say, theology commenting on structural analysis? What about non-technical managers commenting on fire testing of assemblies? What about, I dunno, naval architects commenting on real buildings?

Oh, no, wait, apparently it's okay to listen to them......

 

[TJM]

What's next?

More ramblings from a guy who thinks he's a corpse, no doubt.

 

[Scott Sommers]

You seem to have forgotten that others studied the WTC dust long before Jones. I recommend you have a look at the work of Dr. Judy Wood. She is also a PhD and her degree is in material engineering. She has some very interesting ideas about the WTC dust. Here's her website http://www.drjudywood.com/
I also like this video where she talks about the WTC attack as a new Horoshima http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzSN7dKSAaM

So don't go accepting all this thermite stuff before you've looked at all the options. Remember - ask questions, demand answers!!

 

[Galileo]

Exactly. And what about those who study, say, theology commenting on structural analysis? What about non-technical managers commenting on fire testing of assemblies? What about, I dunno, naval architects commenting on real buildings?

Oh, no, wait, apparently it's okay to listen to them......

Dr. Griffin is a scholar. There is a difference between a scholar and a scientist. Learn it.

 

[Scott Sommers]

And so is Judy Wood. Take a look at her writing. It will change the way you think.

 

[Architect]

Dr. Griffin is a scholar. There is a difference between a scholar and a scientist. Learn it.

I'm afraid I'm going to have to ask you to clarify; are you suggesting that this makes Dr. Griffin a reliable "expert" in respect of the collapse?

 

[Galileo]

I'm afraid I'm going to have to ask you to clarify; are you suggesting that this makes Dr. Griffin a reliable "expert" in respect of the collapse?

Yes, Dr. Griffin is an expert scholar regarding all aspects of 9/11.

 

[twinstead]

Yes, Dr. Griffin is an expert scholar regarding all aspects of 9/11.

Why are only people whom you agree with considered "expert scholars" in your mind? You DO know there are many expert scholars who don't agree with you, right?

 

[boloboffin]

The higher the hit count, the closer to Jesus.

 

[The Platypus]

First, 20 something hacks who write about souped up cars are thermite experts.

Now, those who study topless women in Africa are experts on nano-thermite.

What's next?

Obviously you know nothing about Popular Mechanics or National Geographics and fail to think for yourself instead of reciting some juvenile nonsense...

PM is not a publication about hot rods, and NG not about topless women in africa...

Your cult is quite childish...

 

[beachnut]

Dr. Griffin is a scholar. There is a difference between a scholar and a scientist. Learn it.

There is? In Griffin case you don't have to worry what the difference is, Griffin is a liar on 911. But I have seen your evidence to support your position on Griffin; very interesting.

... I AM GALILEO. ...

... I am not a troll. I am Galileo, the Truthseeker.

... Galileo Galilei = Galileo the JREFer

Did you miss all the lies in his books?
Then you might post this as more proof of your delusion on Griffin.

Or you will post “snore”, or “yawn”, and that is the substance of your evidence to show Griffin is a scholar and fail to read Griffin’s books which contain hearsay, lies and fantasy, no evidence on 911. Griffin writes fictional books on 911. Learn it.

They will expose Griffins lies and you will not accept it. They will be kind to the village idiot spewing lies and selling them in book form to the willfully ignorant on 911. It could be called fraud; learn about it.

 

[TruthersLie]

So this National Geographic special is created by people who post bad info on their website promoting the very same special?

Edited by Tricky: 

Rule 12 violation removed.

Although we do allow some leeway for insults that are related to the ongoing discussion, it is much better and less likely to recieve an infraction if members don't try to see how far they can go. Posting politely without insults, related to the discussion or otherwise, is the best policy.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: tricky

wow... not even 100 posts before the first warning... I am waiting to see the frothing at the mouth and full banning by 300.

Try again HI...

 

[Galileo]

Why are only people whom you agree with considered "expert scholars" in your mind? You DO know there are many expert scholars who don't agree with you, right?

If they don't agree with me, that means they are not experts.

 

[Galileo]

actually it isnt
with quotes "9/11 conspiracy" brings up 334000
without about 2 million

"JFK conspiracy" with quotes brings up 58000
without 1.25 million

then again you could have tested this yourself quite easily

I bet "Galileo", in quotes, blows everyone else out of the water!

Galileo and 9/11 Truth go hand in hand.

 

[Orphia Nay]

I bet "Galileo", in quotes, blows everyone else out of the water!

Galileo and 9/11 Truth go hand in hand.

galileo "9/11 truth": 5,050.

Sorry, you lose. Again.

 

[TruthersLie]

Yes, Dr. Griffin is an expert scholar regarding all aspects of 9/11.

ROFLMAO.

I love ignorant twoofs.

He is an EXPERT scholar regarding 9/11? REally?

How do you explain Ryan Mackey's complete and utter demolition of DR Griffins debunking 9/11 debunking?

over 150 errors (blatant lies, outright errors and misconceptions) in 180 pages. Yup.. that makes him a typical "twoof expert."

And you bought it!!!!! ROFLMAO.

where are those laughing dogs?

 

[Bobert]

;dl; ;dl; ;dl; ;dl; ;dl;