Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

WUBRINY63 said:
Well you can start with me. I never said as much. I think the question you don't want to answer is what percentage agrees with you?
Click to expand...
77.4%.

A whopping 6.5% of the population are cowards like Homeland Incoherency. The ones so afraid of the truth so they say 'don't know' even though the videos clearly show that the plane struck the buildings and they fell from the damage and fires.

howardscripps-1.jpg
 
Last edited:
WUBRINY63 said:
How do truthers have it coming if according to most debunkers it is already all dead?
Click to expand...
It is pretty much dead. All that's left of the 9/11 CTists are the charlatans, trolls and the mentally ill, where do you fit in?
WUBRINY63 said:
When will the need for debunking end? How about you? Why are you still here?
Click to expand...
In my opinion, posters like you (and every other current 9/11 CTist on this forum) should be ignored (as I will from this point on) and only those who can posit intellectually sound end evidence based claims deserve a response. My sole goal right now for being here is to point that out.
 
orphia nay said:
Show me where I criticized their claim.
Click to expand...

I posted where National Geographic made a claim in reference to their up coming 9/11 special. You came back with they should have put quotes around their search criteria and implied their claim was incorrect. That's not a criticism?

And I'm not knocking you discovery. Just be just as critical of the special when it airs and consider the source that you have already found out.
 
Well said, David James.

WUBRINY63 said:
I posted where National Geographic made a claim in reference to their up coming 9/11 special. You came back with they should have put quotes around their search criteria and implied their claim was incorrect. That's not a criticism?

And I'm not knocking you discovery. Just be just as critical of the special when it airs and consider the source that you have already found out.
Click to expand...

Where did I say they should have put quotes around their search criteria? Nowhere.

You are just making crap up and grasping at straws, and now I've exchanged several posts with you, I know you are not worth responding to any further.
 
jfk inside job -1,460,000 google hits
9/11 inside job - 3,220,000 google hits
NIST WTC7 report - 2,550,000 hits

Considering the huge number of internet nutjobs and conspiracy websites, this isn't really surprising. Isn't the internet the greatest (current) incubator of idiot conspiracy theories, after all?

And wasn't 9/11 the major shock of the internet age in America?

Looky here - google 'Obama Birther' and you get 284,000,000 hits.
That puts 9/11 'truth' in perspective, don't it? About 2% as important to Americans, judging by internet traffic. Hehe.
 
Last edited:
And much further down the list of real interest to the world:


Jim Fetzer 9/11 - 22,800 hits
Niels Harrit nanothermite - 25,500 hits
Steven Jones nanothermite - 29,500 hits
Richard Gage 9/11 - 99,400 hits
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth - 239,000 hits
WUBRINY63 - 2 hits, both compliments of JREF. ie: nobody really cares what you think.


Mark Roberts 9/11 - 2,590,000 hits!! It's official! Gravy's bigger than JFK, and almost as popular as 9/11 itself..
Eat your hearts out Richard, Niels and Steven. People obviously aren't that interested...
 
Last edited:
Just realized Richard Gage was in the video (the second clip on controlled demolition) peddling his idiotic theories. Can't escape that clown.
 
alienentity said:
jfk inside job -1,460,000 google hits
9/11 inside job - 3,220,000 google hits
NIST WTC7 report - 2,550,000 hits

Considering the huge number of internet nutjobs and conspiracy websites, this isn't really surprising. Isn't the internet the greatest (current) incubator of idiot conspiracy theories, after all?

And wasn't 9/11 the major shock of the internet age in America?

Looky here - google 'Obama Birther' and you get 284,000,000 hits.
That puts 9/11 'truth' in perspective, don't it? About 2% as important to Americans, judging by internet traffic. Hehe.
Click to expand...

Lessee: 9/11 not inside job = 3,380,000 hits. Truthers lose.

And for the record: my ass inside job = 1,680,000 hits.
 
WUBRINY63 said:
How come? Isn't it dead?
Click to expand...

Wubriny, you know who you would have LOVED??

Tweeter, he was a complete waste of electrons, who after every single complete failure of the Truth movement would come in and say something like:

"hur, dhur, I thought the truth movement was dead."

That was it, that was his whole bag of tricks. And we would all chuckle to ourselves because Tweeter was consistently confusing the sound of the hammer driving a nail into a coffin with a heartbeat.

You two guys would get along swimmingly.
 
I am going to barbecue some chicken today. Should I worry about my grill collapsing due to thermal expansion?
 
alienentity said:
And much further down the list of real interest to the world:


Jim Fetzer 9/11 - 22,800 hits
Niels Harrit nanothermite - 25,500 hits
Steven Jones nanothermite - 29,500 hits
Richard Gage 9/11 - 99,400 hits
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth - 239,000 hits
WUBRINY63 - 2 hits, both compliments of JREF. ie: nobody really cares what you think.


Mark Roberts 9/11 - 2,590,000 hits!! It's official! Gravy's bigger than JFK, and almost as popular as 9/11 itself..
Eat your hearts out Richard, Niels and Steven. People obviously aren't that interested...
Click to expand...


I only get 36,300
 
WUBRINY63 said:
Is this true? How come? If it's not then I guess we can't expect much from the special.
Click to expand...

actually it isnt
with quotes "9/11 conspiracy" brings up 334000
without about 2 million

"JFK conspiracy" with quotes brings up 58000
without 1.25 million

then again you could have tested this yourself quite easily
 
Conspiracy: Thermite, which is less traceable, was used in the controlled demolition that brought down the towers.
Science: Some truthers claim dust that some New Yorkers found after the attack shares the components of thermite. Scientists assert that even if this dust did contain thermite, it would be impossible to determine whether the thermite came from a controlled demolition or simply from the melting of the airplanes. EMRTC designed an experiment to see if thermite was a plausible option in the collapse of the towers. The thermite in the test was not even able to melt a column much smaller than those in the World Trade Center.
Click to expand...

The scientists who assert the thermite, actually studied the WTC dust and found the thermite. Whoever wrote the National Geographic website has not actually studied the WTC dust, their opinion is worthless.

Also, the term "truther" is not a scientific term.

National Geographic, though, just to be safe, then asserts that if there was thermite in the WTC dust that it would be impossible to determine if it came from a controlled demolition.

That again is wrong. For one thing, the people who put the thermite in the WTC may some day admit it. Or an investigation could determine that it was done.

Also, not just thermite, but high-tech nano-thermite was found. Only the military has the technical ability to make nano-thermite.

Dr. Harrit, the world's leading expert on WTC dust, estimated that 10 to 100 tons of nano-thermite was in the WTC. National Geographic makes the preposterous statement that 10 to 100 tons of nano-thermite might have been on the airplanes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom