I've mentioned the blowing out of the building on 'Pilots' for 9/11 twoof forum several months ago. In response I got two allegations, without source, claiming that some debris, possibly from the Pentagon, landed there.
They considered that as conclusive evidence significant parts of the building was blown outwards from the inside. Of course, I was also promptly banned for ignoring "repeated warnings", of which I received none.
McHrozni
Yaers ago when George
someoneorother(Simpson?) on PfT expounded on how it was a missile that exploded in the Pentagon, on PfT's Pentagon forum, I listed all the reasons why it could not have been.
-damage was mostly confined to the first floor where the bulk of the aircraft went in whereas a missile capable of blowing out that front wall would have blown the floors out on several levels
-the approx 100 feet of exterior wall's brick and concrete was not in evidence in front of the building where it would be had an explosion occured within the building(or as was also suggested, within the wall itself)
- the generator had moved towards the building illustrating that the force that moved it came from a direction away from the wall
- a blast within the building would have seen the back wall suffer much the same damage as the front wall which was quite obviously not the case
My post was moved to "Debate" because my comments were not properly "researched".
Yeah, like George
someoneorother had, but did his post go to "Debate"? Not on your life.
I was later banned from PfT for giving them advice on how to get their story out to the MSM thereby generating a public swell of support. I had not realized they did not want help.
To the therm
?te question ;
Have we not told the TM's time and time again that using therm
?te on a vertical support would be extremely problematic due to the way liquid acts in a gravity well?
