Merged National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

Mr.Herbert

Graduate Poster
Mr.Herbert
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
1,449
National Geographic Special - "9/11 Science and Conspiracy" Debunks Thermite Myth

While following a link from Enigma's thread, I went to the National Georgraphic website. There are several pages dedicated to this special that will air on August 31st.

In part:



Conspiracy: Thermite, which is less traceable, was used in the controlled demolition that brought down the towers.
Science: Some truthers claim dust that some New Yorkers found after the attack shares the components of thermite. Scientists assert that even if this dust did contain thermite, it would be impossible to determine whether the thermite came from a controlled demolition or simply from the melting of the airplanes. EMRTC designed an experiment to see if thermite was a plausible option in the collapse of the towers. The thermite in the test was not even able to melt a column much smaller than those in the World Trade Center.
Click to expand...

thermite.jpg
 
It looks like they too may have debunked Ranke's flyover fantasy:

THE ATTACK ON THE PENTAGON


Official Story: Hijackers caused a commercial airplane to crash into the building.

Science: Purdue University created a visual simulation of the crash, which indicated the victims’ bodies would have been pushed forward in relation to one another, just as they were in the actual attack. . To further investigate, EMRTC launched a projectile into a simulated structure. They did not include wings in the projectile model because Purdue asserted they were of little consequence as the Pentagon was so heavily reinforced. The experiment created a hole in the structure the approximate size of the projectile - similar to photo evidence from the actual attack.


Conspiracy: The Pentagon was either bombed or hit by a missile.

Science: EMRTC also planted an explosive in the same model structure and compared the results to photos of the Pentagon after the crash. The explosive test demonstrated a different sort of damage. The structure blew out from the point of the explosion, causing complete destruction of floors and walls. This dispersed debris did not match the photo evidence.
Click to expand...


​

http://channel.nationalgeographic.c...and-conspiracy-4067#tab-conspiracy-vs-science
 
This sounds like the special Dylan was interviewed for back in December.

I will say this ... the crew at Creative Differences were the coolest and most level-headed bunch I've been interviewed by so far. They took the time to actually listen to my answers, and the main producer was not interested in mining sound bites from me or forcing me into a corner. When I asked to discuss certain things, he gladly accepted. When I told him that Sibel Edmonds was the most gagged woman in history and that she's willing to share her classified information on a national platform such as CNN, FOX, MSNBC, or, say, National Geographic, their interest was peaked. And I was invited out for drinks later that night.

So ... we might be pleasantly surprised by the results. We might not be. Time will tell.
Click to expand...

Yeah, and Lucy might not yank the football away at the last moment.
 
LOL for awhile Craig was claiming that NATGEO videos supported the CIT CULT theory.
NO DOUBT that NAT GEO are paid NWO operatives.
 
and the truther spin to get out of this begins in 5...4....3...2...

TAM:)
 
I find this comment amazing.....


When I told him that Sibel Edmonds was the most gagged woman in history and that she's willing to share her classified information on a national platform such as CNN, FOX, MSNBC, or, say, National Geographic, their interest was peaked.
Click to expand...

Share classified information?

If she does actually have classified information and she shares it then I hope she ends up in jail, because that's where she will belong.
 
"When I told him that Sibel Edmonds was the most gagged woman in history and that she's willing to share her classified information on a national platform such as CNN, FOX, MSNBC, or, say, National Geographic, their interest was peaked. And I was invited out for drinks later that night."

it is piqued, dylan, ya MORON
 
Bobert said:
Seeing Dylan eat his words is going to be SWEEEEEEEEET
Click to expand...

Almost as sweet as the South Park episode.

Note to Dylan: Remember how many times you thought someone was on your side, only to find out that they really weren't? Remember all those Hollywood meetings for LC Final Cut? Remember how positive you felt after the BBC interview? Remember what a great Pal you had in Alex Jones? Heard from Jason lately?

I feel a bit sorry for you Dylan. Just a tiny eensy weensy little bit sad. Mostly I find it funny. Laugh out loud funny.
 
Can't wait to see this!

The publshing of the Jones/Harrit paper was either going to light a huge fire, or flop. I think its hit the ground with a resounding 'thud'. And it's going to go rapidly downhill from this point, IMHO.

NIST released the WTC7 report a year ago. Anyone who's interested can download it and read it. You can't seriously compare the depth of NIST analysis with the twittering from Jones and Harrit. They come across as amateurs, at least to me.
 
Definately looking forward to this. "Truthers" will likely find ways to "debunk" it and of course Alex Jones will claim National Geographic are pawns for the NWO. But nonetheless I imagine it'll be informative.
 
Brainache said:
Remember how positive you felt after the BBC interview? Remember what a great Pal you had in Alex Jones? Heard from Jason lately?
Click to expand...

What happened with Dylan and Alex/Jason?

They had a spat?
 
So far the only objection anyone's bothered to lodge at DU is that National Geographic is too beholden to the government for funds to be objective. This despite my OP there mentioning the field trip NatGeo put onto Flight 77.
 
Last edited:
boloboffin said:
So far the only objection anyone's bothered to lodge at DU is that National Geographic is too beholden to the government for funds to be objective.
Click to expand...

I find that whole line of thought childish, and really lacking logic or insight.

Everyone who gets money from the govt are paid shills who tow the govt line?

As Barney Frank would ask,

"On what planet do you spend most of your time?"

TAM:D
 
T.A.M. said:
and the truther spin to get out of this begins in 5...4....3...2...

TAM:)
Click to expand...

I've mentioned the blowing out of the building on 'Pilots' for 9/11 twoof forum several months ago. In response I got two allegations, without source, claiming that some debris, possibly from the Pentagon, landed there.
They considered that as conclusive evidence significant parts of the building was blown outwards from the inside. Of course, I was also promptly banned for ignoring "repeated warnings", of which I received none.

McHrozni
 
McHrozni said:
I've mentioned the blowing out of the building on 'Pilots' for 9/11 twoof forum several months ago. In response I got two allegations, without source, claiming that some debris, possibly from the Pentagon, landed there.
They considered that as conclusive evidence significant parts of the building was blown outwards from the inside. Of course, I was also promptly banned for ignoring "repeated warnings", of which I received none.

McHrozni
Click to expand...

banned? from PF911T? really? Well I never!!


Kind of like the man wearing the straight jacket in the rubber room telling you,

"you are no longer welcome in here!"

TAM:D
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom