amb
Unregistered
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2007
- Messages
- 18,777
The cosmos may be infinate. but So is the stupidety of man.
I said that is what he is "basically saying" or in other words implying and I stand by that statement.
And my Evidence thread currently in the History Forum shows there is evidence; maybe not proof but there is evidence.
Using DOC's reasoning, Jalal Talabani isn't the independant President of Iraq, but a puppet president for the United States.
You know who's in KV55 don't you? *
YOU? No. you're not dead yet.
BORIS KARLOF!
It was supposed to be the tomb of Akhenaten or Queen Tiye.
Quote from the Theban Mapping Project:
"The tomb may originally have contained a number of burials brought from Amarna and later redistributed in other tombs. The mummy of Queen Tiye, for instance, may have been placed in KV 55 and later in the Amenhetep II cache (KV 35)."
I must check my facts after the mistake about Constantine's Mother.
![]()

Evidence of Jesu's divinity? Well, dont just sit there gawking at the monitor, lets have it!!
I assume you believe these men died for fiction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_martyrs
It is Americanese, more specifically of the Southern California Valley Girl Dialect.
Also, death to the Hittites.
OK, then Ramsay didn't say propaganda like you said he said -- and what evidence are you talking about in the past 100 years that would make Sir Ramsay wrong when he discovered there was a Roman census every 14 years beginning with Emperor Augustus.
I'm surprised DOC still continues to refer to his ...
Actually this is what Sherwin-White said:
"For Acts the confirmation of historicity is overwhelming. Yet Acts is, in simple terms and judged externally, no less of a propaganda narrative than the Gospels, liable to similar distortions." - Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testament by A. N. Sherwin-White pg 189.
I guess he believes anything to do with the Divinity of Christ is a distortion. He accepts the history of Acts as overwhelming, but once Acts talks religion, he calls it propoganda. That is a supernatural bias, plain and simple.
Read the blog posting on someone who actually did. It does not support apologists misquote of his work.Actually, this sounds rather like that Jeffersonian 'cafeteria style' resumen of the NT, rejecting the jive, retaining the humanistic and moral values.
I'd like to read more of Sherwin-White.
Because he is the last of any great historian or archeologist who would do so since recent evidence has overturned many assumptions about the Bible.Jerome O'Conner and Jan Assman have published on the subject. Why pretend Ramsay is the last word on 'Luke's' accuracy ?


HA, too late
Hattusa capital city of the Hittites
No longer such a wretched hive of scum and villainy
![]()
Read the blog posting on someone who actually did. It does not support apologists misquote of his work.
http://youcallthisculture.blogspot.com/2007/11/apologists-abuse-of-sherwin-white.html
I confess.Because he is the last of any great historian or archeologist who would do so since recent evidence has overturned many assumptions about the Bible.