Sorry about the length of this post. This is just to give debunkers one more chance to provide examples of similar collapses to WTC1. 10% crushes 90%.
bill smith wrote
'' But there is no other example of a building having been crushed down by the lightest one-tenth of itself in the entire world history of construction on the planet Earth Newton. Thousands and ten-thousands of years and millions and millions of buildings say that it is impossible without deliberate demolition. It has never,ever happened.''
'' You cannot show differently using either of the two acceptable methods. Example or modelling Newton. You know why ?......because i
t can't be done without deliberate demolition.''
Twinstead wrote
'' Well, there's a bunch of pretty qualified people around the world who disagree. I feel comfortable considering your opinion totally worthless in this matter. But thanks for playing.''
bill smith wrote
'' They can disagree all they like. Until they can provide an example or a model the simple fact is that one-tenth of a structure cannot crush the other and stronger nine-tenths of the same structure down to the ground by gravity alone. It has nver been done in the history of this planet and it never will be. Isaac Newton says so. (I can repost Smith's Law if you disagree) ''
bill smith wrote
'' I am coming to realise Newton that we really don't have to prove anything. We have 100% unbroken precedent on our side and it's completely conclusive. Such a collapse has never , ever happened in all the many thousands of years of construction on this planet. We are talking millions upon millions of structures. Isaac Newton is with is to the death on this. The itegrity of his Laws depend on it.''
'' Who do you have ?- Bazant and friends ? Ho ho ho.''
Newtons Bit wrote
'' What precedence? How many 1000 ft tall steel framed buildings have collapsed again '' ?
bill smith wrote
'' Any structure where the top and lightest 10% crushes the other and stronger 90% down flat on the round by gravity alone will do.''
'' PS....and you better be able to come up with something credible and in the true spirit of the argument.'' '' Otherwise WTC1 was demolished without a doubt.''
T O T A L S I L E N C E as a response to this question from Newton's Bit, T, AW Smith,,R.Mackey,Gravy,RWQuinn etc etc.
bill smith wrote
'' Now that we have reversed the burden of proof please feel free to show us your best reasons why WTC1 was
not demolished by explosive demolition.''
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=148317&page=43
So can we say from these exchanges that no structure on Earth, big or small in the entire history of this planet Earth has ever been known to collapse because the top and lightest 10% crushed the other and stronger 90% down flat on the round by gravity alone ? .
Bear in mind that although WTC1 was hit by a plane the collapse did not commence for a further hour. Therefore the collapse dynamic has to be seen as a seperate physical event and strictly in a structural deformation way. Ten percent crushes 90% in other words.
Absent a convincing answer it seems that the burden of proof is now reversed and you must now show us your best reasons why WTC1 was
not demolished by explosive demolition.
