Monketi Ghost
Confusion Reactor
- Joined
- May 21, 2003
- Messages
- 25,141
Glad, glad. Good to hear.
I'm also glad to hear that it went well.gloat Neener neener neener /gloat
It appears that you listened to us and we thank you for that.
It was kind of fun. But I wouldn't go there again.
I'd never go back, and it's honestly not worth going to, even for a laugh. It's just a really stupid, sad place.
I'm also glad to hear that it went well.[\quote]
I'm glad to hear that you think it went well, your "doom and gloom predictions" were really rather over the top.
So that seems what you expected, despite the common rationality of aetheists and of people of belief (with may the exception of some die hard fundamentalist christians) didn't happen! Chock one up to the general decency of people.Assuming for now that your report is accurate, it might well be due, at least in part, to people like us who warned you of the disaster you might have faced if you hadn't taken precautions.
Oh towlie, it wasn't apparent what your affliation was before now but now it is. Still, despite your prejudices, I thank you for affirming the basic humanity of us godless atheists.It appears that you listened to us and we thank you for that.
There were no widespread problems. Airplanes weren't about to fall out of the sky. The hype was entirely due to the radicals who believed that since the year 2000 was here, that the earth was coming to an end.We all saw something similar during the beginning of the year 2000 right after the "Y2K" scare. Computer experts everywhere had warned about how computers would malfunction because they'd think the year was 1900. There were skeptics, but the people who mattered listened to them. They checked and updated their software ahead of time to ward off problems, just as the experts had advised, and when New Year's Day 2000 came and went, there were very few serious reports of computer problems.
Of course those same computer experts then had to endure some gloating from those who had doubted them all along, but I'm sure that was a small price to pay for knowing that they had helped avert a disaster.
They didn't advert a disaster - there was no disaster in the making except for the afirmations of credulous fools. The whole 2000 predictions were a fizzled match, in most cases since it wasn't a problem in the first case. It was credulous (and eager people) wanting to announce the end of the world. It happens every 1000 years. It's happened before, it will happen again. People love end of the world scenarios. The most popular one now being 2012 based on the Mayan calendar which many credulous people have no understanding of.
Still, despite your prejudices, I thank you for affirming the basic humanity of us godless atheists.
Well if the results of the outing didn't prove us wrong about atheists' perceived holier-than-thou attitude, your sarcastic tone sure does.![]()
Mike, I wish you'd quit apologizing because we weren't wrong.
Yep- I'd have to agree that one comment by one person is certainly enough to prove your perceived attitude about a group of millions.![]()
How do you know that it was your advice that guided the group? Maybe the same outcome would have prevailed had your advice been ignored.It was sound advice, and fortunately they appear to have listened to us and followed it.
I suppose you all know the Creation Museum has been taken over by the IRS.

You might be getting mixed up with Kent Hovind's Dinosaur Adventure Land, the creationist theme park in Pensacola, Florida.
Yanks love these things.![]()
Ken Ham said:Just over four years ago, my homeland of Australia passed legislation to allow its citizens to obtain citizenship in another country, yet retain their Australian citizenship. My family and I (having lived in the USA for over 17 years at the time) immediately applied to become American citizens.
That abomination he built might be here, but his heart still lies in Oz.
I would expect an atheist, of all people, to be wary of the "how do you know" straw man argument. I never said I knew anything.How do you know...