9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

[NWO Sentryman]

And 9/11 investigator: PLONK!

 

[I Ratant]

I'm going to say this and then I'm going to bow out. I am not jewish and I was born a few years after WW2. My father was a military policeman who was with the screaming eagles. They liberated a small jewish concentration camp in Germany. I forget the name of it and I ought to be ashamed of myself. He saw jews in skeletal states. He saw dead and decaying jews. They weren't gassed they were shot to death. He wanted to kill the guards but he didn't. No one did at this death camp but they should have.

I have a choice to either believe the jewish people or to believe some stinking worthless nazi sympathizer. I believe the jews.

.
Before the Holocaust was officially noted, my father brought home his experiences and photographs of his tour of Europe from Normandy Beach to Pilsen Czechoslavkia, including many photos of concentration/death camps.
That the Holocaust occurred is undeniable, by any sane human being.

 

[9/11-investigator]

You are an evil liar and an extremely foolish one. Mia devoted her life to searching for lost relatives. For decades, she scoured Western Europe, tracking down non-Jewish family friends. Absolutely no one had ever heard from ANY of the dozens of people she tried to find. These people are not "missing"; they were murdered!

Have you any idea how many people the Red Cross has on file who miss relatives due to war? Millions.

Do you have any idea how many people in fact do find their relatives? Only thousands.

(I happen to know the Red Cross organization from the inside from a professional point of view).

And I am talking about the year 2005, where the ICRC has a computerized search and trace facility at it's disposal and thousands of workers in the field with laptops who interview refugees. It's really less than a percent. So how much more difficult must it have been around 1945 to find back missing relatives when they only had paper files and no world wide networked computers. Almost zero chance.

 

[9/11-investigator]

.
Before the Holocaust was officially noted, my father brought home his experiences and photographs of his tour of Europe from Normandy Beach to Pilsen Czechoslavkia, including many photos of concentration/death camps.
That the Holocaust occurred is undeniable, by any sane human being.

Describe for us what you saw on these photos that proves the holocaust. You do understand what the holocaust means, do you. It's not about putting people in a camp but about killing them in a organized systematic way.

And before you make a fool of yourself, if your father visited only places roughly along a straight line between Normandie and Pilzen than he never was in a so-called 'death-camp'. They are supposed to be located much further to the east.

Pilzen is located in the far west of the present day Czech Republic.

 

[Twiler]

I don't understand why you're making an argument about the locations of places that you insist don't exist.

'Supposed to be located'? Where are you getting your information from? If it's a valid map, doesn't the fact that it shows death camps prove they existed? If it's an invalid map, why bring it up?

 

[9/11-investigator]

I'm going to say this and then I'm going to bow out. I am not jewish and I was born a few years after WW2. My father was a military policeman who was with the screaming eagles. They liberated a small jewish concentration camp in Germany. I forget the name of it and I ought to be ashamed of myself. He saw jews in skeletal states. He saw dead and decaying jews. They weren't gassed they were shot to death. He wanted to kill the guards but he didn't. No one did at this death camp but they should have.

I have a choice to either believe the jewish people or to believe some stinking worthless nazi sympathizer. I believe the jews.

I believe every word you say. We have no disagreement. The situation in the camps at the end of the war was horrible. Guess why that was?

 

[9/11-investigator]

I don't understand why you're making an argument about the locations of places that you insist don't exist.

'Supposed to be located'? Where are you getting your information from? If it's a valid map, doesn't the fact that it shows death camps prove they existed? If it's an invalid map, why bring it up?

I Ratant wants to make the point that the holocaust happened because his father has visited the camps and say 'it' with his own eyes. The point is that if his father never went further east than Pilzen he could never have been in an extermination camp, regardless if these alleged extermination camps where extermination camps or not. According to current holocaust orthodoxy these extermination camps were located as indicated on the map I gave you.

Can you follow that argument?

 

[dtugg]

Have you any idea how many people the Red Cross has on file who miss relatives due to war? Millions.

Do you have any idea how many people in fact do find their relatives? Only thousands.

(I happen to know the Red Cross organization from the inside from a professional point of view).

And I am talking about the year 2005, where the ICRC has a computerized search and trace facility at it's disposal and thousands of workers in the field with laptops who interview refugees. It's really less than a percent. So how much more difficult must it have been around 1945 to find back missing relatives. Almost zero chance.

Assuming that what you say is true, nazi, it seems very likely that the missing relatives are actually dead. You know, like the millions of people that your heroes murdered during the Holocaust.

 

[dtugg]

I believe every word you say. We have no disagreement. The situation in the camps at the end of the war was horrible. Guess why that was?

Because your heroes murdered millions of people in them.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Assuming that what you say is true, nazi, it seems very likely that the missing relatives are actually dead. You know, like the millions of people that your heroes murdered during the Holocaust.

Illogical conclusion. And since I have enough of your attacks as well (without admins intervening), you go on the ignore as well.

 

[dtugg]

You're a Holocaust denier and a twoofer, nazi, you don't know what an illogical conclusion is. Anyway, bye bye. Hopefully you will get to meet your Fuhrer sometime soon.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Churchill himself asked that the lines be bombed, immediately. He did not wait for the cabinet to debate it, but rather, he asked the Air Force to do it right away. The request went to the American Air Force Commander, General R. Eaker, who gave it his full support, but had to pass it up the ladder, where the matter was debated in Washington for quite some time.

Sadly, Churchill's request came in on the 7th July 1944. The tracks between Budapest and Birkenau stopped being used on the 9th. After that, the requests from Jewish groups stopped being about bombing the tracks, and started being about protective documents for as many Jews as possible.

You can read further about it here. Either way, it shows that Churchill had certainly seen lots of proof that the Holocaust was going on, and wanted to do something about it, DURING the war itself.

You were probably too lazy to read your own linked article but it says something completely different than what you claim it says: the article claims that Churchill "gave Eden the full authority of the Prime Minister to follow up the request to bomb the railway lines to Auschwitz.". On whose request? His own intelligence organizations? His American Allies? No, The Jewish Agency! 2 days before the deportations to Auschwitz halted. So not 'immediately' at all , as you wrongly claim. These same Jews who tried to fake a holocaust one world war earlier (see my earlier posts about the 'First Holocaust'). For years the Brits had eavesdropped on all communications to and from Auschwitz and never noted anything special. That's why they did not bomb these lines. Nothing happened. The Red Cross, who regularly visited these camps reported on the camps saying that nothing special was going on. The Allies made numerous air-photos from Auschwitz. Nothing to be seen. Nada, zilch.

 

[dafydd]

I'm back,but I'm not sure if I want to be a member of a site that would let 911 Investigator post his bile.He should be banned.

 

[BTMO]

I'm back,but I'm not sure if I want to be a member of a site that would let 911 Investigator post his bile.He should be banned.

I would.

Free discourse of ideas and all of that sort of thing.

Of course, his ideas are nonsense, and have been demonstrated to be nonsense by many, many posters.

I doubt very few people will read what he writes and think "ooooo! He must be right! The Holocaust never happened"

Holocaust deniers are right up there with bigfoot and UFO believers. Actually, they are closer to reptoid alien believers, based on their grip on reality.

 

[paximperium]

I'm back,but I'm not sure if I want to be a member of a site that would let 911 Investigator post his bile.He should be banned.

I completely disagree. He has not yet advocated any violence. Freedom of Speech from a minority viewpoint, no matter how vile, is important. If you get to censor him, what makes you think he or anyone won't get a chance to censor you if he becomes a majority?

He gets the right to spew his bile and we get the right to correct him using reality...and laugh at him in the process.

 

[FineWine]

I admit that it sounds rather harsh to put it mildly. But you have to admit that he does not announce any unconditional extermination of the Jews, but only in retaliation if the Jews would succeed to plunge Germany in a war for the second time. You might argue that this was exactly what the Jews did, via their English proxy and American serfs. So yes, this is ammo for the holocaust orthodoxists, the motive was there.

On the other hand, Khrushchev famously predicted to bury American capitalists. Not much of the sort happened in this direction. Saying something and doing something are two different things.

I do not say that I know for a fact that no gassings etc. did occur. But the proof for what allegedly happened is so poor that for the moment I stay with my preliminary judgment of 250,000 people died in the camps (as a consequence of the war conditions), as administered by the Germans themselves and several hundred thousand people killed in cold blood by the Einsatztruppen in the East. If additional killings took place, than probably on the initiative of Himmler, not Hitler. Nothing of what my opponents have presented here inclines me to change my mind.

Of course nothing could change your mind: you are totally irrational. Your helplessness when confronted with Eichmann's rather inexplicable failure of imagination is damning. There he was, on trial for his life in proceedings watched by the entire world, and it never occurred to him to deny the fundamental reality underpinning the charges against him.

You people are as stupid as you are evil.

 

[9/11-investigator]

Of course, his ideas are nonsense, and have been demonstrated to be nonsense by many, many posters.

Oh really? Like where? Postnumber(s) please.

Nevertheless, chappeau for your rare defense of freedom of speech.

 

[BTMO]

Oh really? Like where? Postnumber(s) please.

Numbers 6 and 17 for starters.

And the multiple reposts of number 17...

 

[paximperium]

You people are as stupid as you are evil.

Please do not insult the Evil. He is an Evil wannabee, a person who is attempting to sound important when in fact he is as relevant as Reptoid believers and about as evil as a dog kicker.
He is just jealous that all those Jooos and brown people who are doctors, physicists and making money and moving society forward while his little cult remain street sweepers and completely irrelevant.

Please do not insult Evil.
-The Association of Evil Inc.

 

[IDB87]

For years the Brits had eavesdropped on all communications to and from Auschwitz and never noted anything special. That's why they did not bomb these lines. Nothing happened.

From Uzzy's link:

On 12 September 1941, which was shortly before the Babi Yar executions in Kiev, the chief of the Ordnungspolizei in Berlin gave an instruction that no more information was to be sent by top-secret radio messages - The result was that all subsequent information was sent by telephone, which could not be listened to; or by letter, personal report, and by courier. This small and incomplete window on the Einsatzgruppen killings was closed almost as soon as it had been opened. Only sixteen days after the order not to transmit by radio, the Babi Yar executions took place, and 33,000 were murdered in three days.

Bolding mine.

Is it possible the information the Brits did not find, which could have spurred them to act much sooner in regards to Auschwitz, was never intercepted because it was never transmitted? I find it more than reasonable that the SS would have a 'hush-hush' policy about what was transmitted into/out of their death camps.

It is also possible the RAF was never in a position to bomb the lines to Auschwitz until 1944. Unless you think the Luftwaffe would just let enemy bombers come in and sever their rail lines?