• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Moderated Continuation - Why a one-way Crush down is not possible

Newtons Bit said:
Beats what Christopher7 was doing, he just creates new definitions to new engineering words he doesn't understand. Then gets upset at us when his definition doesn't match the real-world definition.
Click to expand...

'm going to write any future engineering stuff that I write in layman's terms and if the engineers here don't understand it...well...that will be a pity. I suspect that other laymen- who are after all the real audience will understand well enough.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
'm going to write any future engineering stuff that I write in layman's terms and if the engineers here don't understand it...well...that will be a pity. I suspect that other laymen- who are after all the real audience wil understand well enough.
Click to expand...
They will understand you you support lies, failed ideas and you have no idea what you are talking about on 911. The entire audience sees you prefer delusion instead of reality when it comes to 911. So far you have posted by accident ideas that refute Heiwa and you had no idea what you posted.

You have not offered engineering stuff to support Heiwa failed ideas; why? When will you post the pages of calculations?
 
beachnut said:
They will understand you you support lies, failed ideas and you have no idea what you are talking about on 911. The entire audience sees you prefer delusion instead of reality when it comes to 911. So far you have posted by accident ideas that refute Heiwa and you had no idea what you posted.

You have not offered engineering stuff to support Heiwa failed ideas; why? When will you post the pages of calculations?
Click to expand...

Whatever I do Beachnut I don't lie. I believe absolutely that 9/11 was an inside job. You know this but it suits your MO to call me a liar.
 
Last edited:
So people..... the topic of this thead is why a one-way crush down of WTC1 is impossible. We are already 20 pages into this second thread on this exact subject and still nobody has has come close to showing how it could be done in the official way.

I'm sure unbiased readers will be not unaware that our well qualified engineers cannot explain how WTC1 collapsed in any way that makes sense while still conforming to the government story.

That leaves the theory of controlled demoliton a clear leader.
 
Last edited:
Heiwa said:
If you drop out a pizza in a box on something, I can assure you that it will not look like that one in the pizza box. You agree?
Click to expand...

Of course I agree. That's what pizza does when dropped on a surface; it's much more elastic than the box it was in.

In comparison to the dynamics of the WTC collapse, the analogy is useless.
 
bill smith said:
...
That leaves the theory of controlled demoliton a clear leader.
Click to expand...
What school of engineering backs your failed delusion?

Your lack of knowledge has made you a liar on this a structural engineering issue. The towers collapse on 911 make your statement a failure.

bill smith said:
Whatever I do Beachnut I don't lie. I believe absolutely that 9/11 was an inside job. You know this but it suits your MO to call me a liar.
Click to expand...
Why do you post a lie then?
The statement "911 was an inside job" is a lie. Sorry you have no evidence to keep your delusion from being a lie. The same lack of evidence dooms Heiwa's ideas.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
So people..... the topic of this thead is why a one-way crush down of WTC1 is impossible. We are already 20 pages into this second thread on this exact subject and still nobody has has come close to showing how it could be done in the official way.
Click to expand...

Considering how much knowledge you lack concerning the dynamics of collapse mechanisms, I would not take your word for it.

I'm sure unbiased readers will be not unaware that our well qualified engineers cannot explain how WTC1 collapsed in any way that makes sense while still conforming to the government story.

That leaves the theory of controlled demoliton a clear leader.
Click to expand...

No Bill, it doesn't.
You can have an opinion, but an opinion doesn't make it true.
 
Heiwa said:
LOL! A compacted structure approximately equivalent to broken down and still in the box!
Click to expand...


Thirteen floors, THE BIG PART, fall on top of and crush one floor, THE SMALL PART. Then fourteen floors crush one floor. Eventually, one hundred nine floors crush one floor, and the building has been reduced to a pile of rubble.

You are a fraud.
 
bill smith said:
All this rubble was presumably lying on top of part A when Part C fell on top of it and compacted it. I am almost licking my lips in anticipation of the explanation here.
Click to expand...


Seriously, why don't you just stop babbling? You add absolutely nothing. You understand nothing, you know nothing, and you can't be taught. Stop pretending to debate with real engineers. You can't do it.
 
bill smith said:
I've seen T. beaten in argument plenty of times but this one is the most comprehensive thrashing I've seen him take yet. And it was administered with such casual ease and grace. Admirable Heiwa.
Click to expand...


You've never seen tfk beaten in argument by any of you fact-free liars. If the ridiculous gibberish peddled by your dimwitted guru had any science whatever behind it, the dolt would win a Nobel Prize. Your incredibly stupid trolling disgraces you without advancing your insane cause, yet you persist. Why?
 
bill smith said:
'm going to write any future engineering stuff that I write in layman's terms and if the engineers here don't understand it...well...that will be a pity. I suspect that other laymen- who are after all the real audience will understand well enough.
Click to expand...

Nice example of the fairly common delusion that lack of education somehow imparts special knowledge that eludes the "eggheads".
 
bill smith said:
I remember when Shyam Sunder made the annoucement that 'thermal expansion' was at the heart of the collapse ofWTC7. It was done in such a way that a person would have got the impression tht it was some kind of newly-discovered phenomenon. I had to do a double-take myself. I was thinking 'isn't that just the fact that metal expands under heating' ?

Well I had exactly the same feeling when I read T's most recent tracts and also the blue line - green line thing. There was nothing that we didn't already know, yet he was trying to make it sound like a eureka' finding. You guys may genuinely be fooled by this kind of stuff or willing to go long with it. Not me.
Click to expand...

But, Bill, you don't know anything about physics or engineering. Heiwa, an utter charlatan, has fooled you.
 
bill smith said:
I keep getting a picture in my head of Heiwa standing in the ring, stooping and picking a towel up off the floor. He wipes the sweat from his face and his body and throws the towel on the ropes. Then I see the capital 'T' on the towel.
Click to expand...


Yes, I can understand why you'd see Heiwa as a masked wrestler. He's every bit as phony as the rest of them. Nobody buys your ignorant braying, by the way. Your silly guru got crushed again.
 
bill smith said:
Whatever I do Beachnut I don't lie. I believe absolutely that 9/11 was an inside job. You know this but it suits your MO to call me a liar.
Click to expand...


You misunderstand (Whoa! Stop the presses!). We get the idea that you are a slave to your delusions. Although your imaginary conspiracy is absurd and impossible, your hatred of America compels you to promote idiocy. You are lying when you distort quotes, and make up bogus science. Again, the three essential components of being a "truther" are stupidity, dishonesty, and insanity. All are essential, but none is sufficient by itself.
 
bill smith said:
So people..... the topic of this thead is why a one-way crush down of WTC1 is impossible. We are already 20 pages into this second thread on this exact subject and still nobody has has come close to showing how it could be done in the official way.

I'm sure unbiased readers will be not unaware that our well qualified engineers cannot explain how WTC1 collapsed in any way that makes sense while still conforming to the government story.

That leaves the theory of controlled demoliton a clear leader.
Click to expand...

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=97584

I did it over a year ago, genius. That's the energy balance. The collapse progresses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom