• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11-investigator explains the Holocaust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Semantics aside! It is time to call a spade a spade.

9/11 investigator you insult the millions of victims of the biggest campaign of systematic destruction in human history.

You are a troll. Nothing less. A troll that tries to provoke people, when you cater to the stormfront demographic woth your rubbish!

David irving talks a load of bunk. His works have been debunked by Laurence Rees.

Your fantasies of invading the United States are just clouds in the sky. They make Operation Sealion look Plausible by comparison.
 
It cracks me up to see a Dutchman threatening the USA with a military takeover...

Never said that, meant it symbolically. What I do mean is that all these American aspirations for global domination will prove to be futile since they will cause the rest of the world to unite against them. And that is what is happening right now. Recently the 'BRIC' nations gathered in Russia, the US was not allowed to join. Topic was amongst others abandoning the US-dollar as reserve currency, on of the main pillars of US global power.

In 2003 Germany, France (and Russia) refused to go along with the Iraq-safari, a clear breach from the NATO alliance solidarity. An early sign that the NATO sooner or later will be dissolved.
 
http://www.hitler.org/art/

Mind you, Hitler painted this himself!

Hey, I think I know you!

"Hitler, there was a painter! He could paint an entire apartment in one afternoon! TWO COATS! Churchill. He couldn't even say 'Nazi'. He would say 'Noooo-zeeehz, Nooooooooooooo-zeeehz!' It wasn't Noses, it was Nazis! Churchill!... Let me tell you this -- and you're hearing this straight from the horse - Hitler was better looking than Churchill. He was a better dresser than Churchill. He had more hair! He told funnier jokes! And he could dance the pants off of Churchill!"

Producers196.jpg
 
Last edited:
No you can't.

Give me examples of his 'atrocious taste'.

Arnold Breker? Wagner?


Leni Riefenstahl?
Arno Breker?
Adolf Ziegler?
Very pompier, indeed.

On the other hand, you have the regime's hatred of Chagal, Picasso or the whole impressionism.

Yeah, the nazi taste in art was about as bad as their taste in politic (but, watching 'Band of Brothers' again, one could imagine they had a good taste in wine).



Never said that, meant it symbolically. What I do mean is that all these American aspirations for global domination will prove to be futile since they will cause the rest of the world to unite against them. And that is what is happening right now. Recently the 'BRIC' nations gathered in Russia, the US was not allowed to join. Topic was amongst others abandoning the US-dollar as reserve currency, on of the main pillars of US global power.

In 2003 Germany, France (and Russia) refused to go along with the Iraq-safari, a clear breach from the NATO alliance solidarity. An early sign that the NATO sooner or later will be dissolved.


France has been out of NATO since the 50ies or 60ies.

And France still has troops deployed alongside American's in Afghanistan.
 
Semantics aside! It is time to call a spade a spade.

9/11 investigator you insult the millions of victims of the biggest campaign of systematic destruction in human history.

You are a troll. Nothing less. A troll that tries to provoke people, when you cater to the stormfront demographic woth your rubbish!

David irving talks a load of bunk. His works have been debunked by Laurence Rees.

Your fantasies of invading the United States are just clouds in the sky. They make Operation Sealion look Plausible by comparison.

A troll is somebody who operates under a false pretext with the aim to disrupt a forum.

I on the contrary mean what I say and you know it. Which has a rather unifying effect on the flock here btw. :D
So what do you mean 'troll'?

Irving has repeatedly sad that the holocaust is not his study target, he never wrote a book about it. He finds the topic 'boring'.
 
Last edited:
A troll is somebody who operates under a false pretext with the aim to disrupt a forum.

I on the contrary mean what I say and you know it. Which has a rather unifying effect on the flock here btw. :D
So what do you mean 'troll'?

Irving has repeatedly sad that the holocaust is not his study target, he never wrote a study about it. He finds the topic 'boring'.

No, a troll is someone who posts flaming comments on a topic. I am not flaming. You are.

You troll message boards, hoping to draw more users.

Then why has irving been an outspoken holocaust denier.

as for saying i did not mean an incasion of the CONUS, i'll dreg up that comment:


America is a luxury European Civilization can no longer afford.

So you need to go. And that's what you will. And 9/11 will be the catalyst. And it will be brought about by a temporarily alliance between Europe, Russia, China, Japan, Iran and others and patriotic forces within the US (Constitutionalists, think Ron Paul). And after 9/11 will come the abolition of the FED, an institution captured by Jewish private bankers located in London in 1913 and currently costs Euro-America 40 million $ per hour on interest payments with which its complete political system is corrupted, bought and paid for.

Next we are going to liberate you.

'Storming the opposite beach'.

Goodnight.

Note, it is on Page 9
 
Last edited:
Hey, I think I know you!

"Hitler, there was a painter! He could paint an entire apartment in one afternoon! TWO COATS! Churchill. He couldn't even say 'Nazi'. He would say 'Noooo-zeeehz, Nooooooooooooo-zeeehz!' It wasn't Noses, it was Nazis! Churchill!... Let me tell you this -- and you're hearing this straight from the horse - Hitler was better looking than Churchill. He was a better dresser than Churchill. He had more hair! He told funnier jokes! And he could dance the pants off of Churchill!"

[qimg]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_DnPwaEn8aGE/RjiEiU4U3wI/AAAAAAAADEk/s0KdTgC0Acc/s320/Producers196.jpg[/qimg]

"Don't Be Stupid, Be A Smarty!
Come and Join The Nazi Party"

And Kenneth Mars > Will Ferill.
 
Before this thread turns into a total train wreck, allow me to be the first (next?) to say: "I for one, welcome our jewish overlords... and ladies."

[qimg]http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c345/Kilstryke/11667_large.jpg[/qimg]

(That's Noa Tishby, in case any of you open minded types were wondering.)

I'll Take Rachel Weisz. Now THERE is a nice Jewish Girl..
And Natalie Portman ain't chopped liver either.
 
I have always found "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" A very good overview. Although it is not specifically about Hitler, it gives a very good contextual big picture of what the Nazis were about


Yes, but it's pretty dated, A LOT of new material has come out since 1960.
 
Yeah, the nazi taste in art was about as bad as their taste in politic (but, watching 'Band of Brothers' again, one could imagine they had a good taste in wine).

Goring certainly did, along with his taste for art. He had very good taste in the paintings he stole.
The irony is that many Nazi leaders,while paying lip service to Der Fuehrer's hatred of modern art, collected it on the sly.
 
I have always found "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" A very good overview. Although it is not specifically about Hitler, it gives a very good contextual big picture of what the Nazis were about


Yes, but it's pretty dated, A LOT of new material has come out since 1960.
 
Yes, but it's pretty dated, A LOT of new material has come out since 1960.

You should try martin kitchen.

I also have "luck of the devil" by Sir Ian Kershaw.

Also check out my essay comparing holocaust deniers to creationists and Twoofers.
 
Are you sure that your judgment is not troubled by your intense desire to place yourself on the 'good side'?

It's rather simple to refute your silly notions.

http://www.hitler.org/art/

Mind you, Hitler painted this himself!

One of my favorite's:

http://www.hitler.org/art/buildings/building5.jpg
http://www.hitler.org/art/buildings/building4.jpg

Not world class, but nevertheless, not bad at all.

But appreciating this makes me a Nazi, doesn't it, oh dweller of the Disney Universe of the Good and the Bad.


All of this proves you are a troll and having us on...there is a reason Hitler didn't get into the art academy...you're just proving their point.
 
So, let me see, Evans can be excused because he has accepted money from the state, but Fred Leuchter (who you tried to sneak by) was an acceptable witness (at least until you were called on it)? Strange.

Irving is a liar and ultimately a very poor scholar. Whatever he achieved through scholarship he pissed away through his lies, distortion, anger and hate. At the same time, he should never have been convicted by the Austrians. The more appropriate punishment was the thrashing that Deborah Lipstadt's (sp?) attorney's gave him and his humiliation in London.

ETA: Have you read the London trial transcript? Your hero looks quite pathetic, incapable of cogent argument and completely out of his element when confronted with real scholarship and a judge that can think.
 
Last edited:
Irving acting as his own defense is the perfect proof of the old saying "A man who acts as his own lawyer has a fool for a client."
 
If this thread were to turn into a 'train wreck' it will be because of your sabotage efforts.

Dude, when a thread centers around beliefs such as yours, I couldn't sabotage it if I had ten pounds of thermite and unfettered access to the JREF server.

But let me ask you... if you were alone with Miss Tishby (or the aforementioned Rachel Weisz) and she were willing and unaware of the waffen SS uniform in your closet... would you do it?

I mean, your blood would be unaffected. It's only your kids that would be impure.

So... would you?
 
Leni Riefenstahl?
Arno Breker?
Adolf Ziegler?
Very pompier, indeed.

Although almost everybody condemned Leni Riefenstahl for her propaganda efforts in support of the Nazi regime I never heard anybody deny her great cinematographic talent. Breker is too pompous to my taste indeed, but that's a far cry from calling him atrocious.

On the other hand, you have the regime's hatred of Chagal, Picasso or the whole impressionism.

Picasso, good grief...


France has been out of NATO since the 50ies or 60ies.

They joined NATO from the start and remained member of NATO ever since. What you probably mean to say is that France under de Gaulle withdrew from the high-command in order to remain independent and not subjugated to the US, after a role on equal footing was denied by the US. But they remained committed towards the goals of NATO, namely to keep the Soviets out of Europe.

And France still has troops deployed alongside American's in Afghanistan.

Since France elected a crypto Jewish neocon president Sarkozy, who elected on his turn an extreme-leftwing foreign minister Bernard Couchner (but Jewish himself and that's what counts), France broke with its Gaullist tradition of independence and offered unlimited support to the goals of neoconnish Washington.

No surprises here.
 
Irving acting as his own defense is the perfect proof of the old saying "A man who acts as his own lawyer has a fool for a client."

James Keegstra hired an attorney and he didn't fare much better. If you're an attorney, having a KluKKing idiot for a client, whether you're him or not, tends to make your case an exercise in futility.
 
(...) Have you read the London trial transcript? Your hero looks quite pathetic, incapable of cogent argument and completely out of his element when confronted with real scholarship and a judge that can think.


Sounds interesting.
I went and googled it: Here are part of the transcripts has put online by Dr. Lipstadt and Emory University.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom